Joe Biden impeachment inquiry

#527
#527

AOC accuses Republicans of fabricating evidence in Biden impeachment​

Democratic representative also prompted witnesses to admit they had no first-hand knowledge of wrongdoing by the president


www.theguardian.com

AOC accuses Republicans of fabricating evidence in Biden impeachment

Democratic representative also prompted witnesses to admit they had no first-hand knowledge of wrongdoing by the president
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com


The Republicans have nothing. They don't have anything on Hunter Biden much less the president. A transparent fishing expedition aimed at smearing the president. The GOP is a joke--a bad one.
 
#529
#529
hog88 said:
Again, this is an investigation to see if there is grounds for impeachment. Why do you have a problem with that if there is no evidence?
Click to expand...

LOL: You investigate when you have grounds/evidence that merits a more thorough investigation. They have nothing. They've never had anything. They don't have anything on Hunter Biden much less the president. This is a favorite GOP ploy for trying to smear Dems: "There is no evidence, true--but there /could/ be something so we must investigate." They did this with the '20 election. Had not a scintilla of evidence of fraud---but there /might have been fraud/ so we're going to throw out a lot of nonsense to suggest there was and get our stupid base riled up. All of the election accusations were TOTAL BULL$HIT. Same with Clinton and Benghazi--disgraceful dirty politics. Same with this. They've already spent 7 months investigating this..and diddly.
 
#532
#532
"political impeachment malpractice" LMAO

If there was any doubt that the House GOP is a bunch of knuckledragging hacks, they put that to rest today.

 
  • Like
Reactions: lostsheep
#533
#533
turbovol said:
LOL: You investigate when you have grounds/evidence that merits a more thorough investigation. They have nothing. They've never had anything. They don't have anything on Hunter Biden much less the president. This is a favorite GOP ploy for trying to smear Dems: "There is no evidence, true--but there /could/ be something so we must investigate." They did this with the '20 election. Had not a scintilla of evidence of fraud---but there /might have been fraud/ so we're going to throw out a lot of nonsense to suggest there was and get our stupid base riled up. All of the election accusations were TOTAL BULL$HIT. Same with Clinton and Benghazi--disgraceful dirty politics. Same with this. They've already spent 7 months investigating this..and diddly.
Click to expand...
So Hillary didn’t obstruct/destroy evidence? Benghazi didn’t happen?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, jp1 and StarRaider
#534
#534
turbovol said:
LOL: You investigate when you have grounds/evidence that merits a more thorough investigation. They have nothing. They've never had anything. They don't have anything on Hunter Biden much less the president. This is a favorite GOP ploy for trying to smear Dems: "There is no evidence, true--but there /could/ be something so we must investigate." They did this with the '20 election. Had not a scintilla of evidence of fraud---but there /might have been fraud/ so we're going to throw out a lot of nonsense to suggest there was and get our stupid base riled up. All of the election accusations were TOTAL BULL$HIT. Same with Clinton and Benghazi--disgraceful dirty politics. Same with this. They've already spent 7 months investigating this..and diddly.
Click to expand...

Yeah, you're right. It's totally normal for a lifelong salary man who never made more than $170k in his life to have a net worth of over 10 million (disclosed).
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, jp1 and StarRaider
#535
#535
turbovol said:
LOL: You investigate when you have grounds/evidence that merits a more thorough investigation. They have nothing. They've never had anything. They don't have anything on Hunter Biden much less the president. This is a favorite GOP ploy for trying to smear Dems: "There is no evidence, true--but there /could/ be something so we must investigate." They did this with the '20 election. Had not a scintilla of evidence of fraud---but there /might have been fraud/ so we're going to throw out a lot of nonsense to suggest there was and get our stupid base riled up. All of the election accusations were TOTAL BULL$HIT. Same with Clinton and Benghazi--disgraceful dirty politics. Same with this. They've already spent 7 months investigating this..and diddly.
Click to expand...
This is entirely for people (mostly independents) who don't follow the ins and outs of DC politics. The GOP just wants to muddy the waters so they can say "you too" when we hit them in debates with the massive legal trouble that the Grand Orange Poobah is in.
 
#536
#536
evillawyer said:
This is entirely for people (mostly independents) who don't follow the ins and outs of DC politics. The GOP just wants to muddy the waters so they can say "you too" when we hit them in debates with the massive legal trouble that the Grand Orange Poobah is in.
Click to expand...
The beauty of today is the left playing dumb to what they know and have seen. Not defending Biden’s wealth increase and the countries involved in the payments rather deflect. But again, after watching Crockett, Garza, Thalib and Moskowitz it’s easy to see. Actually thought AOC had a good day of direct yes no questions that didn’t help the Republicans.
 
#539
#539
TNVOLNAVY said:
The VN leftist filth need to pace themselves. It’s only day 1 of the impeachment inquiry and they’ve almost exhausted themselves defending crooked Joe with months and months still to go.
Click to expand...
I want 13 more months so a new Congress has the facts…

I will say it again..all they have to do is admit who is The Big Guy and that would end it
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Majors
#540
#540
Orangeburst said:
I want 13 more months so a new Congress has the facts…

I will say it again..all they have to do is admit who is The Big Guy and that would end it
Click to expand...
So simple. Truthfully at this point, kudos to both Joe and Hunter for staying alive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#542
#542
Orangeburst said:
They complained about Jared business dealings being influence peddling and now want to use that as a defense..lol
Click to expand...

Wrong, Earl. They're not in any way using that as a defense. Kusher used his White House position---total nepotism, he had no qualifications to do anything in government and the secret service and our intelligence agencies did not want to give him a security clearance--to get a major loan from the government of Qatar to bail out his bad investment in 666 Fifth Ave., and then he became a total lackey and stalking horse for the corrupt regime in Saudi Arabia. It gave Kushner $2 BILLION for a new private equity fund the baby-faced gangster son-in-law supposedly has started, despite the fact that Kushner has zero private-equity experience. This is all far shadier than anything Hunter Biden supposedly did. Essentially, Kushner used his public/government work to enhance his private financial interests. That's corruption with a capital C. The gangster, of course, did the same. Major, transparent corruption.

evin Report

Report: Jared Kushner’s $2 Billion Saudi Check Appears Even More Comically Corrupt Than Previously Thought​

“The reason this smells so bad is that there is all sorts of evidence he did not receive this on the merits.”

www.vanityfair.com

Report: Jared Kushner’s $2 Billion Saudi Check Appears Even More Comically Corrupt Than Previously Thought

“The reason this smells so bad is that there is all sorts of evidence he did not receive this on the merits.”
www.vanityfair.com www.vanityfair.com

Read this piece from Vanity Fair, with reporting from the New York Times, and you'll see how /real/ corruption looks.
 
Last edited:
#544
#544
turbovol said:
Wrong, Earl. They're not in any way using that as a defense. Kusher used his White House position---total nepotism, he had no qualifications to do anything in government and the secret service and our intelligence agencies did not want to give him a security clearance--to get a major loan from the government of Qatar to bail out his bad investment in 666 Fifth Ave., and then he became a total lackey and stalking horse for the corrupt regime in Saudi Arabia. It gave Kushner $2 BILLION for a new private equity fund the baby-faced gangster son-in-law supposedly has started, despite the fact that Kushner has zero private-equity experience. This is all far shadier than anything Hunter Biden supposedly did. Essentially, Kushner used his public/government work to enhance his private financial interests. That's corruption with a capital C. The gangster, of course, did the same. Major, transparent corruption.

evin Report

Report: Jared Kushner’s $2 Billion Saudi Check Appears Even More Comically Corrupt Than Previously Thought​

“The reason this smells so bad is that there is all sorts of evidence he did not receive this on the merits.”

www.vanityfair.com

Report: Jared Kushner’s $2 Billion Saudi Check Appears Even More Comically Corrupt Than Previously Thought

“The reason this smells so bad is that there is all sorts of evidence he did not receive this on the merits.”
www.vanityfair.com www.vanityfair.com

Read this piece from Vanity Fair, with reporting from the New York Times, and you'll see how /real/ corruption looks.
Click to expand...
you just proved my point pinhead
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85 and SpaceCoastVol
#546
#546
turbovol said:
This is just a cheap, smear campaign, nothing more. They don't have anything on Hunter Biden except that he bought a gun illegally and got paid to be the board(s) of foreign companies, which is perfectly legal. That's it. And they've got zero on the president. McCarthy went this route to try and appease the extremist crazies in the House, and we see what it's gotten him on the spending bills---nothing.
Click to expand...
😂
 
#547
#547
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Click to expand...


Still not answering, are you?

Where's the proof of anything impeachable by Joe Biden?

1695934959261.gif


You have none.

There is none.

GOP leadership have admitted there is none.

Why not grow a pair and admit that the wingnuts in the GOP are in the wrong on this and let's stop wasting time and money on this pointless crusade and, you know, govern?
 
#548
#548
lawgator1 said:
Still not answering, are you?

Where's the proof of anything impeachable by Joe Biden?

View attachment 582983


You have none.

There is none.

GOP leadership have admitted there is none.

Why not grow a pair and admit that the wingnuts in the GOP are in the wrong on this and let's stop wasting time and money on this pointless crusade and, you know, govern?
Click to expand...
You can't handle the proof. It's there you just choose not to see it or hear it.
I'm not bringing out the coloring books & crayons & give it to you which you'll deny as usual. You're not much of a lawyer are you if you can't determine what's proof w/all the evidence that's been brought before you on day 1. Stay a clown as usual w/your head up your butt.
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top