Joe Biden impeachment inquiry

#553
#553
Oh, and news tonight is that Gaetz and McCarthy and their respective teams are now, literally, cursing at each other. Scumbag. F off.

Yeah, this is the party that has the majority. Sheesz
 
#554
#554
lawgator1 said:
Go ahead and list the evidence that Joe Biden took bribes. We'll all be waiting.



Forever.
Click to expand...
You're a waste of time. See the evidence in the tweet below. You have to be able to read English to understand the evidence. Can you read & understand English? Btw, this is going to be a long process & more evidence of Joe Biden's treason (receiving bribes) shown from bank documents & text messages retrieved between Hunter & daddy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#561
#561
lawgator1 said:
I'm not the one making the claim. The GOP loon, Trump nuthuggers, are.

Tell me, if there's thousands of pages of bank records that prove Joe Biden got money and was bribed, why don't they put a few on screen that show it, hmmmmmm ????
Click to expand...
Stay tuned to the hearings. Maybe later on more details about the Biden Crime Family will spill out that you won't believe then either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#563
#563
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
LOL. Jamie Raskin is a proven liar ranked the highest in the democratic communist party.
Click to expand...

You should be a standup comedian. You'd be terrible at that, too, but it would be better than you consistently making absurd comments on this board.

Did anybody refuse Raskin's comment today? No, they didn't. Is there ANY evidence contrary to what Raskin said today? No, there isn't. Therefore, your comment--per usual--is both wrong and stupid.

From Today's Guardian:

Republicans struggle to provide proof of wrongdoing at Biden impeachment inquiry​

Members of the GOP have been investigating the president’s connections to his son’s business for months to prove corruption

Republicans struggled to put forward any evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden during a hearing on Thursday that’s part of a newly launched impeachment inquiry.

The hearing did not go well for Republicans, who control the US House and allege Biden was connected to his son’s business dealings that could have resulted in bribery and corruption. They have been investigating the matter for months and have yet to produce evidence linking the president to his son’s financial affairs. They failed to do so again on Thursday. Instead, the strategy appeared to be to lay the groundwork to justify a longer fishing expedition.




The three Republican witnesses who testified on Thursday all conceded they did not have firsthand knowledge of any criminal activity by Biden. Two of those witnesses, Jonathan Turley, a conservative law professor, and Bruce Dubinsky, a forensic accountant, acknowledged that the information put forward so far by the committee did not amount to corruption.


“I have previously stated that, while I believe that an impeachment inquiry is warranted, I do not believe that the evidence currently meets the standard of a high crime and misdemeanor needed for an article of impeachment,” Turley said in prepared testimony. Still, Turley argued that there were signs of influence-peddling and that the committee should investigate further.

Republicans were reportedly caught off-guard by Turley’s conclusion and an unnamed Republican aide told CNN the hearing was an “unmitigated disaster” for the effort.

“I am not here today to even suggest that there was corruption, fraud, or any wrongdoing. In my opinion, more information needs to be gathered and assessed before I would make such an assessment,” Dubinsky, the forensic accountant, said in his opening statement.

Thursday’s hearing, led by the House oversight committee, is titled The Basis for an Impeachment Inquiry of President Joseph R Biden Jr. The other Republican witness was Eileen O’Connor, a former assistant attorney general in Department of Justice’s tax division, who wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal criticizing the investigation into Hunter Biden’s finances. O’Connor served on Trump’s 2016 transition team for the treasury department, the Washington Post reported.

The impeachment inquiry appears to be a thinly veiled effort to try to muddy the waters as Donald Trump, who leads the Republican primary field, faces four different criminal cases after being twice impeached.


With little concrete evidence to work with, Republicans instead relied on Hunter Biden’s business transactions and text messages to try to cast aspersions on the president. They offered no connection to Joe Biden.

“The dots are not connected. The name that’s been mentioned the most often in this hearing is Hunter Biden, not President Biden,” Michael Gerhardt, the lone Democratic witness and a law professor at the University of North Carolina, said several hours into the hearing.

“The problem is when you sling mud, you have to have mud,” Representative Jared Moskowitz of Florida said at one point.

The White House essentially ignored the hearing. Instead, its press office blasted out several versions of the same statement throughout the day with a countdown until the government shuts down for lack of funding.

“There are 60 hours and 55 minutes until the government shuts down because of extreme House Republicans’ chaos and inability to govern. The consequences for the American people will be very damaging – from lost jobs, to troops working without pay, to jeopardizing important efforts to fight fentanyl, provide food assistance, and more. Nothing can distract from that,” one such statement read on Thursday morning.

With little substance to debate, and no fact witnesses to testify, the hearing often turned theatrical. At one point, Greg Casar, a representative of Texas, asked members to raise their hands if they thought both Hunter Biden and Donald Trump should be tried, and held accountable for their actions if convicted. All of the Democrats present raised their hands, but no Republicans did.

“I think it is worse than embarrassing that Republicans won’t raise their hands. They refuse to say that equal justice under the law should apply to everyone,” he said.

Democrats also rebuked Republicans for moving forward with an impeachment inquiry absent a full vote from the US House authorizing it. It is not clear whether there is enough GOP support for impeachment in the House for it to survive a full vote.

The New York Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez also accused Republicans of presenting a fabricated text message between Jim and Hunter Biden – the president’s brother and son, respectively – that she pointed out omitted critical context. Representative Byron Donalds of Florida displayed a selectively edited exchange between the two in the format of iMessages, which was not how the committee originally received the communication.
 
#564
#564
It's very clear that the GOP is simply out to smear the president as they worked to smear Clinton with all their Benghazi bull$hit a few years ago.

It's an effort to con the American public....nothing more. And they'll work to drag it out as long as they can by continuing to say that more investigation is needed. There's no more investigating to be done. They've spent 7 months investigating Hunter Biden already. It's all BS--which is essentially all the GOP has these days. Notice how the party never does anything substantive. Conservatives have become a massive embarrassment.
 
#565
#565
turbovol said:
You should be a standup comedian. You'd be terrible at that, too, but it would be better than you consistently making absurd comments on this board.

Did anybody refuse Raskin's comment today? No, they didn't. Is there ANY evidence contrary to what Raskin said today? No, there isn't. Therefore, your comment--per usual--is both wrong and stupid.

From Today's Guardian:

Republicans struggle to provide proof of wrongdoing at Biden impeachment inquiry​

Members of the GOP have been investigating the president’s connections to his son’s business for months to prove corruption

Republicans struggled to put forward any evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden during a hearing on Thursday that’s part of a newly launched impeachment inquiry.

The hearing did not go well for Republicans, who control the US House and allege Biden was connected to his son’s business dealings that could have resulted in bribery and corruption. They have been investigating the matter for months and have yet to produce evidence linking the president to his son’s financial affairs. They failed to do so again on Thursday. Instead, the strategy appeared to be to lay the groundwork to justify a longer fishing expedition.




The three Republican witnesses who testified on Thursday all conceded they did not have firsthand knowledge of any criminal activity by Biden. Two of those witnesses, Jonathan Turley, a conservative law professor, and Bruce Dubinsky, a forensic accountant, acknowledged that the information put forward so far by the committee did not amount to corruption.


“I have previously stated that, while I believe that an impeachment inquiry is warranted, I do not believe that the evidence currently meets the standard of a high crime and misdemeanor needed for an article of impeachment,” Turley said in prepared testimony. Still, Turley argued that there were signs of influence-peddling and that the committee should investigate further.

Republicans were reportedly caught off-guard by Turley’s conclusion and an unnamed Republican aide told CNN the hearing was an “unmitigated disaster” for the effort.

“I am not here today to even suggest that there was corruption, fraud, or any wrongdoing. In my opinion, more information needs to be gathered and assessed before I would make such an assessment,” Dubinsky, the forensic accountant, said in his opening statement.

Thursday’s hearing, led by the House oversight committee, is titled The Basis for an Impeachment Inquiry of President Joseph R Biden Jr. The other Republican witness was Eileen O’Connor, a former assistant attorney general in Department of Justice’s tax division, who wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal criticizing the investigation into Hunter Biden’s finances. O’Connor served on Trump’s 2016 transition team for the treasury department, the Washington Post reported.

The impeachment inquiry appears to be a thinly veiled effort to try to muddy the waters as Donald Trump, who leads the Republican primary field, faces four different criminal cases after being twice impeached.


With little concrete evidence to work with, Republicans instead relied on Hunter Biden’s business transactions and text messages to try to cast aspersions on the president. They offered no connection to Joe Biden.

“The dots are not connected. The name that’s been mentioned the most often in this hearing is Hunter Biden, not President Biden,” Michael Gerhardt, the lone Democratic witness and a law professor at the University of North Carolina, said several hours into the hearing.

“The problem is when you sling mud, you have to have mud,” Representative Jared Moskowitz of Florida said at one point.

The White House essentially ignored the hearing. Instead, its press office blasted out several versions of the same statement throughout the day with a countdown until the government shuts down for lack of funding.

“There are 60 hours and 55 minutes until the government shuts down because of extreme House Republicans’ chaos and inability to govern. The consequences for the American people will be very damaging – from lost jobs, to troops working without pay, to jeopardizing important efforts to fight fentanyl, provide food assistance, and more. Nothing can distract from that,” one such statement read on Thursday morning.

With little substance to debate, and no fact witnesses to testify, the hearing often turned theatrical. At one point, Greg Casar, a representative of Texas, asked members to raise their hands if they thought both Hunter Biden and Donald Trump should be tried, and held accountable for their actions if convicted. All of the Democrats present raised their hands, but no Republicans did.

“I think it is worse than embarrassing that Republicans won’t raise their hands. They refuse to say that equal justice under the law should apply to everyone,” he said.

Democrats also rebuked Republicans for moving forward with an impeachment inquiry absent a full vote from the US House authorizing it. It is not clear whether there is enough GOP support for impeachment in the House for it to survive a full vote.

The New York Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez also accused Republicans of presenting a fabricated text message between Jim and Hunter Biden – the president’s brother and son, respectively – that she pointed out omitted critical context. Representative Byron Donalds of Florida displayed a selectively edited exchange between the two in the format of iMessages, which was not how the committee originally received the communication.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and InVOLuntary
#568
#568
lawgator1 said:
Still not answering, are you?

Where's the proof of anything impeachable by Joe Biden?

View attachment 582983


You have none.

There is none.

GOP leadership have admitted there is none.

Why not grow a pair and admit that the wingnuts in the GOP are in the wrong on this and let's stop wasting time and money on this pointless crusade and, you know, govern?
Click to expand...
I asked you a question earlier. Do you think Joe has committed any wrongdoing?
 
#573
#573
Tough day week for the House GOP.

Cursing at each other and having their own witnesses in the Biden inquiry rain on their parade.
 
#574
#574
jp1 said:
I asked you a question earlier. Do you think Joe has committed any wrongdoing?
Click to expand...

Not really, no. He's been in office so long that it seems to me that if he were on the take there'd be evidence and witnesses to support such a claim. And there just isn't anything to really suggest that Joe Biden has been bribed.

His son try to make a buck by insinuating he had something to offer? A bluff by him? Sure. I'd buy that. But there's just nothing showing that Joe Biden has ever taken a bribe from anyone.
 
#575
#575
lawgator1 said:
Not really, no. He's been in office so long that it seems to me that if he were on the take there'd be evidence and witnesses to support such a claim. And there just isn't anything to really suggest that Joe Biden has been bribed.

His son try to make a buck by insinuating he had something to offer? A bluff by him? Sure. I'd buy that. But there's just nothing showing that Joe Biden has ever taken a bribe from anyone.
Click to expand...
You have no problem if he knowingly allows relatives to make money off his influence? Perhaps even allows these "businesses" to believe what his relatives claim they will get by paying them? Not odd to you that he keeps getting caught lying about his knowledge of his families business dealings?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top