Franklin Pierce
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 4, 2014
- Messages
- 27,384
- Likes
- 31,468
whistleblowers are not legit now?
The impeachments of Trump, where the dems knew they would never get a conviction didn't backfire on them at all. Republicans have tried to be the adults in the room. They've tried to make friends....doesn't work. At all. They can't keep being cowards.
It takes 218 House votes to pass Articles of Impeachment.
222 Republicans
218 Marxists
Republican House members who have spoken out AGAINST impeachment:
Don Bacon (Nebraska)
Ken Buck (Colorado)
Mike Lawler (New York)
Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania)
Nancy Mace (South Carolina) Said she supports the Inquiry, but will not vote to impeach.
The impeachments of Trump, where the dems knew they would never get a conviction didn't backfire on them at all. Republicans have tried to be the adults in the room. They've tried to make friends....doesn't work. At all. They can't keep being cowards.
Witch hunt
Proof that the House will not vote for impeachment--and the number of GOP House members who will vote 'no' will increase after the committee wastes more time---beyond the 9 months already wasted--proving nothing.
The Marxists were all united in their Trump impeachments. There are not enough Republican votes in the House, where they have a 10 vote margin, to bring articles of impeachment against Crooked Joe.
I means they tried to be nice and make people like them. Didn't work. Meanwhile, when the dems have the power they just try to steam roll through everything they want, do impeachments that they know won't go anywhere, ect. They give no *****.They've "tried to make friends." What is this supposed to mean?
It takes 218 House votes to pass Articles of Impeachment.
222 Republicans
212 Marxists
Republican House members who have spoken out AGAINST impeachment:
Don Bacon (Nebraska)
Ken Buck (Colorado)
Mike Lawler (New York)
Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania)
Nancy Mace (South Carolina) Said she supports the Inquiry, but will not vote to impeach.
Seems there is proof he knowingly overstated his assets by 3 billion year after year.
Seems there is proof he attempted to get the GA Sec. of State to steal votes for him. (At least that is how the S of S recieved the message - which is what really matters.)
JUST ANOTHER SAD DAY IN AMERICAN HISTORY! JOE BIDEN DID NOTHING WRONG AND THE CROOKED, RUDE HOUSE REPUBLICANS ARE SHOWING THEIR BIAS WITH THIS WITCH HUNT! THERE WAS NO STOLEN ELECTION! THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION BETWEEN BIDEN AND HIS SON!! WHAT A SHAMEFUL DISPLAY THAT TRAILER TRASH MTG AND METH HEAD KEVIN MCCARTHY HAVE COOKED UP! TOTAL WITCH HUNT HOAX!
EDIT: FORGOT TO INCLUDE FIVE-HEAD MATT GAETZ. CANT FORGET ABOUT THAT PEDO INNALL THIS WITCH-HUNTERY HOAXISM.
So in your mind, AG Ken Paxton trial in Texas is BS. Finally, I agree with you.They're legit when they have proof of something. If they have no proof, which is the case, then they're probably not legit.
This is just a political stunt by the GOP, just like Benghazi, and everybody knows it.
"The campaign comes as McCarthy tries to hang on to his position as leader of Congress’s lower chamber, despite a mere four-seat Republican majority and rising discontent among its most extreme conservative lawmakers, who are upset over a deal McCarthy reached with Biden to raise the debt ceiling while cutting some government spending, and have demanded recompense in the form of an impeachment inquiry."
The White House spokesman Ian Sams called McCarthy’s announcement “extreme politics at its worst. House Republicans have been investigating the President for 9 months, and they’ve turned up no evidence of wrongdoing[.] His own GOP members have said so[.] He vowed to hold a vote to open impeachment, now he flip flopped because he doesn’t have support,” Sams wrote on Twitter.
In a sign of the paucity of the results of their efforts, reports indicate McCarthy does not yet have enough votes in support of impeaching Biden. Earlier this month, the speaker told Breitbart News, “If we move forward with an impeachment inquiry, it would occur through a vote on the floor of the People’s House and not through a declaration by one person,” but backtracked on Tuesday, making no mention of holding a vote to start the investigation.
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION BETWEEN BIDEN AND HIS SON!!
“Dad takes half my salary”-Hunter Biden
“Hunter was getting paid based on his father’s influence”-multiple Burisma employees and partners of Biden.
“I told them if they wanted the money they had to fire him”-Joe Biden regarding the government official who was investigating his son’s employer
Seems text messages claiming Joe gets half his salary would be evidence. Along with testimony that Hunter was receiving his salary due to the perception of political influence from his father. Along with Joe openly admitting he forced Ukraine to fire the man investigating his son’s company.
How can you see none of that as “evidence”?