I say if you keep her and she stays then she needs a total intervention and how that is done is she needs to get somebody like Becky Hammon in for a private coaching Clinic and every game in the past two years needs to be analyzed and she needs to learn how to coach..really coach...not this faking it until she makes it..stuff she has been doing...someone needs to really school her since all those years with Pat have gone out the window.
It is hard to teach the old dog new tricks.... 35 years as a coach... what is she going to change now? and what she knew with Pat she still has... that is the problem... the game has advanced so much now.... the ladies are so much more athletic, and all problems are not solved by "defense, rebounding, hustle!"
Defense, rebounding (boxing out) and hustle (competitiveness) would have won us a lot more games.
Currie ran off the men's basketball coach from Kansas State in Frank Martin, who has taken South Carolina to their first ever Sweet Sixteen.
Currie would be the biggest fool in college athletics if he were to fire Holly Warlick, who has the Number One recruiting class in America coming in next season.
You can curse, make threats against UT, cry salty tears, and attack other people on this board, but Holly will be the Lady Vols coach for the next TWO (2) seasons.
Use of the word probably lets one know that you have no idea. Name 5 that you absolutely know that would leave what they're doing and come to UT.
I say if you keep her and she stays then she needs a total intervention and how that is done is she needs to get somebody like Becky Hammon in for a private coaching Clinic and every game in the past two years needs to be analyzed and she needs to learn how to coach..really coach...not this faking it until she makes it..stuff she has been doing...someone needs to really school her since all those years with Pat have gone out the window.
Defense, rebounding (boxing out) and hustle (competitiveness) would have won us a lot more games.
Agreed totally NBB - especially the "hustle" on the frequent nights when the gals didn't seem to want to be there....
But without any form of effective offensive system... any hint of it.... Holly is being lefty way back at the starting line.... (OK, "get the ball in to Mercedes" doesn't count as an offensive scheme!)
I agree! Our offense is bad. I believe our offense will be bettter next year with Westbrook, BUT the coaches have to update our offense. But just think, we have 4 young women who WANT to be here and who HATE to lose. Players who don't want to hustle next season won't play.
Well i hope the coaches are capable.... McD's analyst today said Holly was a GREAT coach, so maybe so!
Next season will likely determine the direction of the program. I would still like to see some personnel updates (maybe bring in an offensive whiz like USC did with the former Vandy coach Balcomb).
It is hard to teach the old dog new tricks.... 35 years as a coach... what is she going to change now? and what she knew with Pat she still has... that is the problem... the game has advanced so much now.... the ladies are so much more athletic, and all problems are not solved by "defense, rebounding, hustle!"
Wow. In the first couple responses already there is a wide range of thoughts. Fire. Keep. So, yeah, it's definitely a dilemma....just the whole VFL makes it harder for me, and maybe Currie as a UT background guy.[/QUOTE
I do not see Currie coming in and immediately firing Holly. If anything her saving grace will be the return of Russell and the upperclassmen returning next year, the recruiting class coming in and the 2018 class of 5 stars listing Tennessee as a possible. Holly also has two verbals from 4 stars. Yes, she has underachieved, especially with the talent she had this year, however, on paper we are on the up swing. Holly gets another year to show what she can do with this team. If she under achieves, I think she gets fired.
The question isn't whether you can bring someone in. The question is whether that person will be given the freedom to implement an offensive and not be micromanaged by the head coach. Listening to Coach J it sounds like we have an insecure coach constantly looking over her shoulder.
I do not see Currie coming in and immediately firing Holly. If anything her saving grace will be the return of Russell and the upperclassmen returning next year, the recruiting class coming in and the 2018 class of 5 stars listing Tennessee as a possible. Holly also has two verbals from 4 stars. Yes, she has underachieved, especially with the talent she had this year, however, on paper we are on the up swing. Holly gets another year to show what she can do with this team. If she under achieves, I think she gets fired.
Unless the team just straight out quits on her next year, it's more likely that they just ride out the last year of her contract... only 2 years left at this point.
Next season will likely determine the direction of the program. I would still like to see some personnel updates (maybe bring in an offensive whiz like USC did with the former Vandy coach Balcomb).
Unless the team just straight out quits on her next year, it's more likely that they just ride out the last year of her contract... only 2 years left at this point.
The question isn't whether you can bring someone in. The question is whether that person will be given the freedom to implement an offensive and not be micromanaged by the head coach. Listening to Coach J it sounds like we have an insecure coach constantly looking over her shoulder.