It took you 27,675 posts to finally pull this one out?
I've said basically the same thing since we were discussing "what ifs" before the season even started.
Well, we came within a poor decision of giving the ball back to UGA and a terrible officiating review of going 7-5
I would consider UGA a relative "success" for this staff even though UGA got much worse after that. The Vandy game never should have depended on that one call. It should not have been that close. Jones' strategic decision to "play not to lose" lost that game. I respect his gumption for trying Peterman... but that strategic decision probably cost UT a shot at UF.
But, you still have to remember, we beat a top 10 team in SC and about beat UGA.
Be honest with yourself. How many times out of 100 would UT have beaten USCe this year?
We lost two games to MIz and Aub that we thought would be winnable at the beg of the season.
Not just "lost". Those were non-competitive games. UT was outplayed which I could live with. But they were also outcoached badly... that is harder to deal with when you really want to be hopeful about the near term future of the program... when you would REALLY like to find ANY tangible reason to believe this staff has what it takes to win big games in the SEC.
And that's how people were coming up with 6-7 wins. I think we did ok.
You really think losing to Vandy was "OK"? Really? Sorry. That was VERY poor coaching from the strategy to gameplanning to play calling to adjustments (or lack thereof). They played not to lose and that appeared to kill the enthusiasm of the O. The only positive I saw in that game is the D played their tails off only to come up short in "soft" coverage at the end.
I'm not ready to crown this guy or anything, but you can't tell me that he's hitting on all cylinders
I truly hope not. That's why I left open the possibility that he might do a 180 and actually prove he belongs in the SEC next year. I just cannot find an anchor point in the coaching we witnessed this season to latch on to. Player development? No. Unit development? No. Gameplanning, elite playcalling, great schemes,.... ? No.
I would rather have something that I can at least hang some hope on. If you can point to something tangible... please do. I saw a team that peaked vs UGA and USCe then sharply declined. They played poorly before those games and after.
and he's got commitments from some really strong talent.
That's great but you and I both know that you need both elite talent and elite coaching if you want to win championships. If they can hang on then they'll have SOME talent to work with. But even that can't hang on one class alone.
The first class was OK but nothing to get jacked up about. This class looks to be good. But if he doesn't prove next fall that he can coach players up and win some games that he isn't "supposed" to win... he's not going to keep getting the type of talent he's getting now. To compete for great out of state players on a continuing basis... YOU MUST win. Those kid are attracted to winners.
The roster UT has now was based on two mediocre classes and one pretty good one... with attrition.
We just inherited a slow, untalented team. He's doing what he can but facts are facts. There just isn't any talent on the team.
That's simply not true. It was/is a roster with significant deficiencies. But they were NOT enough to excuse total lay downs vs Ore, Bama, MU, AU, and Vandy.... or a near miss vs USA.
Well coached teams LOOK faster and more talented than they are. Poorly coached teams LOOK slower and less talented than they are. The same guys who looked decent playing in Wilcox's D suddenly looked like they were running in wooden shoes in Sunseri's D. Did they just forget how to run... or was it the coaching?
Like fulmer says, it's not the Xs and Os it's the Jimmies and JOes.
And Fulmer.... often had plenty of Jimmy's and Joe's to compete with the best but was dominated by guys who understood the X's and O's.... and who realized it takes both.