BreatheUT
I see that pretty girl swag.
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2017
- Messages
- 29,968
- Likes
- 40,689
I didn't agree with about 80% of her stances, but I do respect her accomplishment to the highest court.
Looking thru that list makes me feel old and unaccomplished.Top contenders to fill vacant Supreme Court seat include Coney Barrett, Hardiman
Each of these names is on Trump's list of possible nominees, a list he has said he would rely on when making any selection.
Top contenders to fill vacant Supreme Court seat include Coney Barrett, Hardiman
I'll check later, but I think the Kavanaugh vote was 50-48.Pick it. You know what the hell simple majority means right? You’re weighting a non vote with the same weight as a no vote.
And before you step on your tool go look at the final Kavanaugh vote. Murkowski voted present to offset Daines who was not in attendance. Their votes were not counted because they didn’t vote.
The Supreme Court is supposed to be the guardian of the Constitution and yet, here we are fighting over what political power gets to nominate the next Justice.
The nominee should not be about left or right. It should be based on the merits of their work and how they interpret the guiding laws over our lands and not political affiliations.
Disclaimer: I’m well aware that it doesn’t work that way.
He's wondering where that bitemark on his butt came from.Sister evil is just carrying that water with the implications. It’s a 6 vote delta. If 5 R’s just abstain then it’s still an affirmation.
I’m listening on the wind and I’m pretty sure I can hear Harry Reid cussing In Nevada all the way down in Texas.
Amy Coney Barrett. Then the world would get to see the Dems and media try to demonize and smear a female into oblivion.
In the majority of cases before them political persuasion isn't important. However, it does seem like most of the high profile cases are based on politics. We just don't hear much about the ones that aren't.The Supreme Court is supposed to be the guardian of the Constitution and yet, here we are fighting over what political power gets to nominate the next Justice.
The nominee should not be about left or right. It should be based on the merits of their work and how they interpret the guiding laws over our lands and not political affiliations.
Disclaimer: I’m well aware that it doesn’t work that way.