BUBear
Football On The Brazos
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2010
- Messages
- 7,230
- Likes
- 4,324
It hurts your narrative that Thomas was still confirmed by a Democratic controlled Senate. Bork was rejected, but that wasn't a party line vote.I'm sure that Biden remembers chairing the Senate Judicial Committee during the borking of both Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas. Sometimes, sh!t comes back to bite you in the ass.
I feel sure that the Democrats would replace Clarence Thomas with a far right Justice if they had the chance.This doesn't make any sense. RBG was a leftist extremist. If you replace one leftist extremist with another, you haven't changed anything. If you replace a leftist extremist with a far right extremist... you have fundamentally changed the court.
The gloves are off now, for sure. There was a time when both parties wanted a balanced court. There was a pretty good reason to reject Thomas. He was still confirmed by a Dem controlled Senate.I feel sure that the Democrats would replace Clarence Thomas with a far right Justice if they had the chance.
I think I get what you are saying.Which part? The cosmic injustice because maybe I’m on the wrong side , or the Rs want a constitutionalist and the liberals aren’t happy with that possibility , because they are on the wrong side ? I thought it was easy to follow .
The Dems did to Thomas what Dems have a history of doing to black people. They lynched him, and let him swing for several days.This didn't become such a political process until recently. A Democratic controlled Senate confirmed Clarence Thomas even though he had been accused of sexually harassing Anita Hill. A Republican controlled Senate confirmed RBG by a 96-4 vote. Quit being so damn ignorant.
I think I get what you are saying.
In all honesty, I don't even acknowledge the possibility that I may be on the wrong side.
Some things are self evident...............