Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has passed away

[luthervol]

A lot of those people have seen politicians from both parties send their jobs to other countries for years. They have seen their wages stagnate due to competition from illegal foreign workers. They have seen their medical costs soar to pay to take care of people who shouldn't be in the country in the first place. They have seen their sons and daughters fight endless wars for what, exactly? Are you that dense that you think they haven't seen what has been going on, and might take a chance and vote for someone who is at least gives them a voice?

I guess I'm surprised that they were so easily convinced by Trump that he was the voice they needed.
Bannon and Stone were spot on.

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Even Rahm Emanuel Thinks Pelosi and Dems Have Gone Too Far on SCOTUS Attack

As I reported earlier, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was asked by ABC’s George Stephanopoulos if she was planning on trying to impeach President Donald Trump or Attorney General Bill Barr if Trump went ahead with confirmation hearing for a SCOTUS nominee.

Pelosi didn’t disabuse Stephanopoulos of the idea. In fact, she said “We have our options. We have arrows in our quiver that I’m not about to discuss.”

Even Rahm Emanuel Thinks Pelosi and Dems Have Gone Too Far on SCOTUS Attack

 

[AM64]

I don't think that at all.
I do think that it taking something like a Trump for one to bother and vote is incredibly sad, on multiple levels.

Yeah, mostly incredibly sad that Trump beat your POS. You could have had a good candidate, but your party let leftists hijack the platform to get a bloc of votes, and then you had to let Clinton steal the nomination to keep them off the ballot. You reap what you sow, and your party sold it's soul to the devil at least twice.

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Portland Antifa Block Cars, Demand People Raise Fists, Smash Businesses, in Memory of RBG

Antifa in Portland had a “direct action” march, seemingly in memory of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

But Antifa didn’t care about that, defiling Portland and RBG’s memory by reportedly using her face in their promotion and then going around the city, smashing up businesses and people’s property.

Portland Antifa Block Cars, Demand People Raise Fists, Smash Businesses, in Memory of RBG

 

[VolsAgainstTheWorld15]

Republicans would have continued to sit it out if another Romney, McCain or Bush was nominated.

I'm not so sure about that. If the options were to note vote or to vote against Hillary by voting for another establishment candidate, most Republicans I think would have (perhaps reluctantly) chosen the latter. I certainly would have.

 

[luthervol]

Yeah, mostly incredibly sad that Trump beat your POS. You could have had a good candidate, but your party let leftists hijack the platform to get a bloc of votes, and then you had to let Clinton steal the nomination to keep them off the ballot. You reap what you sow, and your party sold it's soul to the devil at least twice.

If you do indeed reap what you sow, the repubs are in for a world of hurt.
The Trump effect will haunt the republican party for decades.

 

[VolsAgainstTheWorld15]

Yeah, mostly incredibly sad that Trump beat your POS. You could have had a good candidate, but your party let leftists hijack the platform to get a bloc of votes, and then you had to let Clinton steal the nomination to keep them off the ballot. You reap what you sow, and your party sold it's soul to the devil at least twice.

Voting Democrat isn't an option for me (and shouldn't be for anyone who opposes socialism). The radicals have seized control of the party.

 

[VolsAgainstTheWorld15]

If you do indeed reap what you sow, the repubs are in for a world of hurt.
The Trump effect will haunt the republican party for decades.

The GOP could have escaped Trump in 2016 had they rallied behind Rubio or Cruz like what the Dems did with Biden. Too many candidates stayed in the race too long which opened the door for Trump to win the nomination.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Ocasio-Cortez to Followers on Ginsburg Death: ‘Let This Moment Radicalize You’

During a 41-minute monologue posted to her Instagram on Friday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) decried potential forthcoming action on replacing Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg led by President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY).

Ocasio-Cortez urged her followers to be proactive in their opposition to any appointment made by Trump, who she called authoritarian.

“We have an authoritarian president,” she said. “That’s what we have. He has no regard for the dignity of human life.”

She also urged her followers to be radicalized about the upcoming election.

“Let this moment radicalize you,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “Let this moment really put everything into stark focus because this election has always been about the fight of and for our lives. And if anything, tonight is making that more clear to more people than ever before.”

Ocasio-Cortez to Followers on Ginsburg Death: 'Let This Moment Radicalize You'

 

[1972 Grad]

I guess I'm surprised that they were so easily convinced by Trump that he was the voice they needed.
Bannon and Stone were spot on.

Not all of our voters are as astute as those on your side that inhabit Old Fourth Ward, Kirkwood, Vine City, East Atlanta Village, and all the other sh!tholes in the Greater Atlanta area.

 

[1972 Grad]

I'm not so sure about that. If the options were to note vote or to vote against Hillary by voting for another establishment candidate, most Republicans I think would have (perhaps reluctantly) chosen the latter. I certainly would have.

Some of us had endured one too many Romney/McCain/Kasich/Jeb Bush milquetoast politicians put in front of us.

 

[Wireless1]

Nope... The issue at hand doesn't concern either Federal Law or the Constitution. The issue concerns the blatant, full frontal, butt naked, hypocrisy on the part of Senate Republicans. They refused to take up a vote on Merrick Garland in 2016 because it was an election year, and in their reasoning the winner of the upcoming election should be the President to fill Scalia's seat. Senate Republicans made no allowances at that time for confirming a nominee from within one's own party during an election year... and worst of all, they broke with precedent by not giving Garland a vote. They could have rejected Garland by way of a normal Senate confirmation process with hearings and a vote, but they chose not to. They now look like hypocrites for it and Democrats have every reason to point this out.

You have it so wrong! Killery made a deal with the republicans to delay the vote so she could nominate Bill. When the vote was being delayed was there ever any chance being given to any republican being elected?

 

[Franklin Pierce]

The Stalinization of Ruth Bader Ginsberg

The United States Constitution has endured savage abuse down through the years, and one of its serial abusers has died. One can imagine the Constitution weeping … with relief.

Politicians are mouthing the obligatory encomia to Ginsberg: “A crusader for women’s equality … an amazing life … fierce dissenter …” yada yada yada.

Most assuredly we will be subjected to a barrage of pageantry to legitimize a career spent twisting the supreme law of the land to suit the progressive catechism. The other justices will probably treat us to speeches about how important she was–and by extension they are–to ‘Merica, truth, justice, and righteousness.

It’s doubtful any of our elites will evince the stones to say: “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.”

Since Ginsberg joined the Supreme Court in 1993, a back-of-the-envelope calculation shows that roughly 26 million unborn children have been legally killed by abortions. Those are Stalin-esque numbers. Ginsberg didn’t order these deaths, but she did everything in her substantial power to make sure the carnage never stopped; and we as a country are left contemplating the stain on our hands.

Perhaps that’s why the Stalinization of Ginsburg must go forward–sanitize her myth so that we do not have to remember the crimes in which she and her learned peers made us complicit.


Today, Americans do not live in a constitutional republic; they live in a benevolent juristocracy and theocracy rolled into one. The justices have made themselves not only lawmakers but lifelong high priests, thrusting their crooked fingers into matters of culture, religion, and tradition at every juncture and molding the United States to their beliefs under cover of “interpreting” the Constitution. All this to say Ginsberg was an enthusiastic product of the rancid estate she inhabited.

Her singular contribution was to erode the political impartiality so often assumed by the justices to shield themselves from much-deserved criticism. In this, she may have done the country a favor.

Ginsburg’s celebrity-cum-judicial-activist schtick–replete with fawning dramas, documentaries, filmed workouts with comedians, “frenemy” subplots with Antonin Scalia, and am absurd procession of neck doilies–helped more than a few Americans to the conclusion that the high court amounts to ‘Keeping Up with the Kardashians’ with a cast of juridical idiot savants.

The Stalinization of Ruth Bader Ginsberg

 

[Ashevolle]

Some of us had endured one too many Romney/McCain/Kasich/Jeb Bush milquetoast politicians put in front of us.

Maybe David Duke will indulge you.

 

[Wireless1]

Portland Antifa Block Cars, Demand People Raise Fists, Smash Businesses, in Memory of RBG

Antifa in Portland had a “direct action” march, seemingly in memory of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

But Antifa didn’t care about that, defiling Portland and RBG’s memory by reportedly using her face in their promotion and then going around the city, smashing up businesses and people’s property.

Portland Antifa Block Cars, Demand People Raise Fists, Smash Businesses, in Memory of RBG

English wasn’t my best subject,
Did Antifa only demand that people raise their fists or did they also demand they smash businesses?

 

[evillawyer]

 

[VolsAgainstTheWorld15]

Some of us had endured one too many Romney/McCain/Kasich/Jeb Bush milquetoast politicians put in front of us.

Jeb and Kasich wouldn't have won the nomination in 2016 anyways. Jeb proved to be too stupid and Kasich was basically a moderate Democrat. The nomination was a three man race between Rubio, Trump, or Cruz. Rubio and Cruz both would have been better than Hillary.

 

[BowlBrother85]

The Stalinization of Ruth Bader Ginsberg

The United States Constitution has endured savage abuse down through the years, and one of its serial abusers has died. One can imagine the Constitution weeping … with relief.

Politicians are mouthing the obligatory encomia to Ginsberg: “A crusader for women’s equality … an amazing life … fierce dissenter …” yada yada yada.

Most assuredly we will be subjected to a barrage of pageantry to legitimize a career spent twisting the supreme law of the land to suit the progressive catechism. The other justices will probably treat us to speeches about how important she was–and by extension they are–to ‘Merica, truth, justice, and righteousness.

It’s doubtful any of our elites will evince the stones to say: “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.”

Since Ginsberg joined the Supreme Court in 1993, a back-of-the-envelope calculation shows that roughly 26 million unborn children have been legally killed by abortions. Those are Stalin-esque numbers. Ginsberg didn’t order these deaths, but she did everything in her substantial power to make sure the carnage never stopped; and we as a country are left contemplating the stain on our hands.

Perhaps that’s why the Stalinization of Ginsburg must go forward–sanitize her myth so that we do not have to remember the crimes in which she and her learned peers made us complicit.


Today, Americans do not live in a constitutional republic; they live in a benevolent juristocracy and theocracy rolled into one. The justices have made themselves not only lawmakers but lifelong high priests, thrusting their crooked fingers into matters of culture, religion, and tradition at every juncture and molding the United States to their beliefs under cover of “interpreting” the Constitution. All this to say Ginsberg was an enthusiastic product of the rancid estate she inhabited.

Her singular contribution was to erode the political impartiality so often assumed by the justices to shield themselves from much-deserved criticism. In this, she may have done the country a favor.

Ginsburg’s celebrity-cum-judicial-activist schtick–replete with fawning dramas, documentaries, filmed workouts with comedians, “frenemy” subplots with Antonin Scalia, and am absurd procession of neck doilies–helped more than a few Americans to the conclusion that the high court amounts to ‘Keeping Up with the Kardashians’ with a cast of juridical idiot savants.

The Stalinization of Ruth Bader Ginsberg

... but Democrats are the radical extremists, right? That redstate crap really doesn't serve your side very well. Not sure why you would bring that here and act like you're proud of it.

 

[AM64]

If you do indeed reap what you sow, the repubs are in for a world of hurt.
The Trump effect will haunt the republican party for decades.

I think you are wrong on that count. Your party is already radicalized; you may have defections of moderates, but other than that there's likely no returning to the center, reality, or to common sense. I'm as independent as they come, but there's not a chance in hell that I'll vote D - dems have generally made me a republican at heart. I don't for a second think I'm one of a kind on that either. I don't like Trump and can even agree with a lot of what you think about him as a person. As president, he's done what I wanted done. Obama and his "fundamental change" and the way dems managed when they held everything was the eye opener. That approach lost you the WH, the senate, and the house at varying times. My real problem is who the GOP selects as a presidential nominee next time because I'd bet they haven't fully understood and will go back to another namby-pamby career politician.

 

[bnhunt]

She was a frickin' lawyer. They are all lying pieces of sh!t. You ever know one that you could trust not to f**** somebody?

I am one, so ...

 

[BowlBrother85]

You have it so wrong! Killery made a deal with the republicans to delay the vote so she could nominate Bill. When the vote was being delayed was there ever any chance being given to any republican being elected?

I see... you're a nut. Good to know. I will make a mental note of that and not reply to you again.

 

[1972 Grad]

Maybe David Duke will indulge you.

And.......Here comes the race card......seemingly out of nowhere, but is always kept near to the dealer's heart, just in case they have no viable argument.

 

[luthervol]

Not all of our voters are as astute as those on your side that inhabit Old Fourth Ward, Kirkwood, Vine City, East Atlanta Village, and all the other sh!tholes in the Greater Atlanta area.

I've always maintained that it's best when the non-astute vote is split about 50/50. It usually is.
Trump was able to move it to 65/35. Bannon and Stone were spot on.

 

[BowlBrother85]

I think you are wrong on that count. Your party is already radicalized; you may have defections of moderates, but other than that there's likely no returning to the center, reality, or to common sense. I'm as independent as they come, but there's not a chance in hell that I'll vote D - dems have generally made me a republican at heart. I don't for a second think I'm one of a kind on that either. I don't like Trump and can even agree with a lot of what you think about him as a person. As president, he's done what I wanted done. Obama and his "fundamental change" and the way dems managed when they held everything was the eye opener. That approach lost you the WH, the senate, and the house at varying times. My real problem is who the GOP selects as a presidential nominee next time because I'd bet they haven't fully understood and will go back to another namby-pamby career politician.

There is a radical element to the Republican Party as well. There is no escaping that. From the Qanon loonies to the conspiracy theorists, the InfoWars crowd... both sides have a toxic underbelly.

 

[1972 Grad]

Jeb and Kasich wouldn't have won the nomination in 2016 anyways. Jeb proved to be too stupid and Kasich was basically a moderate Democrat. The nomination was a three man race between Rubio, Trump, or Cruz. Rubio and Cruz both would have been better than Hillary.

I voted for Cruz in the primary, but he would have been savaged by the press/Dems as a Nazi.