Kavanaugh Confirmation

[Stew Cook]

did they not agree to this on Friday?

Not sure, actually. More curious about the possible disinformation from POTUS.

 

[NorthDallas40]

So, the FBI has free reign over the investigation or not? Trump said so, I've heard other reports that the scope is limited to four people.

If the latter is the case, Is it any wonder that Dems are going to call this a sham?

I read an article yesterday stating there was an initial list based on the credible two claims and follow up witnesses would be interviewed as warranted. And I think Trump tweeted/stated something similar.

Shockingly not hearing that in the MSM though.

 

[Orange_Crush]

The baby came out just fine.
Again, don't blame you for not answering.

Oh, i answered it. Your pain is from breach birth.

 

[Stew Cook]

They have a free reign to investigate the claims by Ford and Ramirez, they don't have free reign to go all Muelly.

If that's true, It's not as bad as the limited scope of just 4 people.

 

[0nelilreb]

So, the FBI has free reign over the investigation or not? Trump said so, I've heard other reports that the scope is limited to four people.

If the latter is the case, Is it any wonder that Dems are going to call this a sham?

Are you ok with the word credible as a limit on an investigation or should they send out agents to Toledo because clingers niece said she thought she saw K dancing coyote ugly style on the biker bar she attends ?

 

[SLICKYINC]

 

[RikidyBones]

Not sure, actually. More curious about the possible disinformation from POTUS.

The willingness to automatically blame trump disqualifies you. Stop it.

 

[Stew Cook]

Are you ok with the word credible as a limit on an investigation or should they send out agents to Toledo because clingers niece said she thought she saw K dancing coyote ugly style on the biker bar she attends ?

I'm fine with the word as long as it applies to tangential corroborating statements.

 

[RikidyBones]

I've been a contact for an FBI background check. hes right. they could miss a Dr. Ford type incident for obvious reasons. But they would not miss the gang rape stuff. zero chance of that.

 

[Stew Cook]

The willingness to automatically blame trump disqualifies you. Stop it.

"Possible", did you miss that word, or are you that defensive?

 

[RikidyBones]

"Possible", did you miss that word, or are you that defensive?

You jumped on that "possibility" over the Senates miscommunication or the Democrats being disingenuous which is far more likely to be the case given the last week.

It's possible Obama is behind all of this... is that a reasonable statement? I'd wager you think it's not.

Dont confuse me for a Trump guy.

 

[Stew Cook]

You jumped on that "possibility" over the Senates miscommunication or the Democrats being disingenuous which is far more likely to be the case given the last week.

It's possible Obama is behind all of this... is that a reasonable statement? I'd wager you think it's not.

You know, it's one way or the other. I'm not impatient. Clarification would be fairly simple

 

[hog88]

If that's true, It's not as bad as the limited scope of just 4 people.

I don't think the FBI needs to be wasting time talking to ex-girlfriends who heard something from someone else who was told by another person. They are probably limiting their investigation to people who were actually there and maybe close associates.

 

[BearCat204]

I dont know if yall know this... but the FBI isnt getting paid starting today. The funding approval hasnt been signed. Just fyi for some hilarity.

Thought it was signed on Friday

 

[Stew Cook]

I don't think the FBI needs to be wasting time talking to ex-girlfriends who heard something from someone else who was told by another person. They are probably limiting their investigation to people who were actually there and maybe close associates.

I agree.

 

[0nelilreb]

I'm fine with the word as long as it applies to tangential corroborating statements.

You mean like the corroborating statements from fords “ witnesses “ ? Yes she said that to me , no I don’t know K , and don’t remember a party that he was supposed to have attended . But I believe her .

 

[BeecherVol]

So, the FBI has free reign over the investigation or not? Trump said so, I've heard other reports that the scope is limited to four people.

If the latter is the case, Is it any wonder that Dems are going to call this a sham?

That didnt fall out of the sky. Go back and watch Flakes comments after the backroom arm bending and deal making (with the Ds) after he was apparantly a yes vote.


If you take the premise that the left doesnt want him on the SC regardless? No one is going to be surprised when they call it a sham. Its expected. If he needs to be a rapist or a drinker to accomplish that, so be it.

 

[Boston Vol]

 

[Stew Cook]

You mean like the corroborating statements from fords “ witnesses “ ? Yes she said that to me , no I don’t know K , and don’t remember a party that he was supposed to have attended . But I believe her .

I know you know that's not what I mean. I imagined a situation like, "yeah, Brett did the same to another girl" so they would talk to the other girl.

 

[0nelilreb]

I know you know that's not what I mean. I imagined a situation like, "yeah, Brett did the same to another girl" so they would talk to the other girl.

I do , I was just being snarky this whole thing just feels wrong .

 

[Orange_Crush]

Edited

 

[volfanjustin]

Good luck with that

 

[UT_VOLS13]

I've been a contact for an FBI background check. hes right. they could miss a Dr. Ford type incident for obvious reasons. But they would not miss the gang rape stuff. zero chance of that.

The FBI came and asked me questions when my neighbor applied for a promotion ( some type of Government employee). They don't mess around on background checks. Also, no way my neighbor put me down as a reference.

 

[0nelilreb]

Good luck with that

That’s a dead man walking no matter what party he’s in . He’s got no backbone to one side and can’t be trusted by the other side .

 

[Hunerwadel]

I’ll bet they do a closed door debrief with Flake, Collins, and Murkowski and ask “ok we’ve got 2/3/4 days left what else you want to see” first. Sadly they hold the cards.

True, they hold the cards. If the FBI is allowed to do a full and thorough investigation they will vote to confirm. I believe if they see Trump trying to reign in the investigation or control it you may lose them.

I don't think K's possible excessive drinking habits are an issue but how he conducts himself when he is drunk is.