- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 19,804
- Likes
- 6,832
For God's sake, quit attacking strawmen. No one is arguing that underage drinking disqualifies K. However to the issue of whether he would have remembered assaulting Ford and whether his testimony about his prior drinking was truthful are implicated
For God's sake, quit attacking strawmen. No one is arguing that underage drinking disqualifies K. However to the issue of whether he would have remembered assaulting Ford and whether his testimony about his prior drinking was truthful are implicated
For God's sake, quit attacking strawmen. No one is arguing that underage drinking disqualifies K. However to the issue of whether he would have remembered assaulting Ford and whether his testimony about his prior drinking was truthful are implicated
For God's sake, quit attacking strawmen. No one is arguing that underage drinking disqualifies K. However to the issue of whether he would have remembered assaulting Ford and whether his testimony about his prior drinking was truthful are implicated
Would he need to have been $h!+ faced for 2 or 3 straight months since we re not even totally sure when this happened in 1982?For God's sake, quit attacking strawmen. No one is arguing that underage drinking disqualifies K. However to the issue of whether he would have remembered assaulting Ford and whether his testimony about his prior drinking was truthful are implicated
For God's sake, quit attacking strawmen. No one is arguing that underage drinking disqualifies K. However to the issue of whether he would have remembered assaulting Ford and whether his testimony about his prior drinking was truthful are implicated
Is that the standard of evidence, counselor? She can't remember much of anything, except to accuse him. She can't corroborate anything. He denies it, but..you know...he may have done it and not remember it...so... Your honor...For God's sake, quit attacking strawmen. No one is arguing that underage drinking disqualifies K. However to the issue of whether he would have remembered assaulting Ford and whether his testimony about his prior drinking was truthful are implicated
A) your side no longer even working the assault angle you know that’s dead.For God's sake, quit attacking strawmen. No one is arguing that underage drinking disqualifies K. However to the issue of whether he would have remembered assaulting Ford and whether his testimony about his prior drinking was truthful are implicated
cuckoo
“If you had a meeting in Wasserstein, you don’t know if he’s going to be there,” Wiener said. “It would be pretty terrifying for any survivor or any person to walk into a building on campus and see someone who has been alleged of a very serious crime.”
Never really drank to excess. Just had a weak stomach to spicy food. And then fffff reference, yeah, not about a stuttering friend's pronunciation of the fourth of July.