Kavanaugh Confirmation

You guys are too much , Blast him when he’s being presidential ( showing sympathy ) Blast him when he’s not ( calling her out on the facts ) . But it’s expected .

Trump simply can't win with any D, regardless of the good he's doing.

Speaking of D's, they are disgusting right now. They are more than willing to ruin Kavanaugh's and his family's life over unverified, unsubstantiated, and unproven allegations, while turning a blind eye to the proven abuse of women within their own party. Furthermore, they only view his family as collateral damage, WHICH ARE ALL WOMEN. See, D's don't really care about women unless they tow the party line and bow down to their party.

D's are more than willing to drag K's family and the country into the grave over partisan politics.

All R's on this board and everywhere need to get up and vote this November.
 
Once again Chris Coons did not sign this new BS demand letter. Can’t stand his politics but I’m starting to have a small amount of respect for him at least. He keeps at least eight really damn horrible friends though.
 
No, I'm talking about a straight line hair bridge over that juts out over the forehead... The Trump?

President Trump has an excuse for any perceived hair problems; the man is 72 years old.

Christine Ford on the other hand is only 51 years old. There is no excuse available to her other than she just doesn't care.
 
Last edited:
Once again Chris Coons did not sign this new BS demand letter. Can’t stand his politics but I’m starting to have a small amount of respect for him at least. He keeps at least eight really damn horrible friends though.

Not like he's going to cross the party line on this vote.
 


Durbin's problem here is that Collins, Murkowski, Flake, Manchin have access to the files. He may get some anti-K folks to become more rapid but it won't sway the votes that matter (unless of course such info is there but then again it's been viewable since the beginning of the process)
 
I understand that. And he’s already voted no once. That’s fine that’s his perogative. At least he’s not attaching his name to this tripe coming from the other 8 committee moonbats.

It's the principle.

No good reason to vote against Kav. There was no good reason to vote against Gorsuch.
 
It's the principle.

No good reason to vote against Kav. There was no good reason to vote against Gorsuch.
And I hear you on that too. And I expect him to vote no again next time around here on K. I’ll take it as a small win he won’t put his name on that tripe. Very very small admittedly.
 
The SJC has more investigative power than the FBI. Since this isn't a criminal investigation, the FBI can't subpoena anyone or anything.

Here's my question, what is the FBI going to find out about K that they didn't already know from

1. Being vetted 6 times previously

2. SJC's investigation, testimonies, and documents

?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol
After I have seen how the Trump haters on this forum come completely unglued, and after I see how the protesters act, I fully believe that there are people just like them in the media, and in the Senate and House of the Democrat party..
How many times has the right attack leftist protestors or attacked politicians, sorry, there is no comparison
 
Pretty telling that the only thing libbies can talk about is Trump's comb-over on a thread about the mistreatment of Kavanaugh
Well, conservatives were attacking the physical appearance of Ford ... and I found that ironic considering how much you idolize a 72 year old fat man who uses an orange spray tan and goes to such extremes to make it appear as though he has a full head of blonde hair.
 
Well, conservatives were attacking the physical appearance of Ford ... and I found that ironic considering how much you idolize a 72 year old fat man who uses an orange spray tan and goes to such extremes to make it appear as though he has a full head of blonde hair.


So, you believe Ford?
 
No, he said sitting Presidents should be immune to criminal prosecution since every idiot with an agenda would be filing charges and the President would never get anything done because they'd be tied up in court.

If I recall, he goes on to say it's the Senate's job to kick them out THEN they can criminally prosecute for whatever the reason was.

Sorry if your selective reading and CNN talking points didn't allow you to actually grasp what he was saying.

It makes sense
 

VN Store



Back
Top