Kavanaugh Confirmation

#12,627
#12,627
SpaceCoastVol said:
Here's a picture of her driving home.

180207_gma_kerley4_16x9_992.jpg
Click to expand...
"Far out man"
 
#12,630
#12,630
BowlBrother85 said:
Just keep in mind that the day after the hearing, Trump called Ford "a very credible witness" who provided "very compelling" testimony.
Click to expand...
If he would have said anything different, he would he been ripped for it. She sounded sincere in the testimony.............................until people started actually checking the crap that was coming from her mouth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77, marcusluvsvols, 0nelilreb and 5 others
#12,632
#12,632
BowlBrother85 said:
Just keep in mind that the day after the hearing, Trump called Ford "a very credible witness" who provided "very compelling" testimony.
Click to expand...
when did it happen? I don't know
where did it happen? I don't know
why did you change the date 4 times? I don't know
who paid for your lie detector? I don't know

He was just trying to be nice
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol, 0nelilreb, FLVOL69 and 1 other person
#12,633
#12,633
RockyTop85 said:
That’s cart before the horse. As the other guy pointed out: How do you remove a president without an investigation?

That’s assuming impeachment is more than an empty threat, even with an investigation. (Spoiler: It’s an empty threat.)

That portion of the article and his views on executive power have been roundly criticized, and for good reason. I’m not alone on an island, here.

The idea that a legislative body that can’t consistently agree to fund the budget is going to be our only hope in the event of a legitimate problem is laughable.
Click to expand...
Congress doesn't launch one of these official investigations that Kavanaugh talks about, so its a moot point on what his opinion on official investigations is. They "review". calling impeachment an empty threat goes a long way to dismissing the whole system, again not something Kavanaugh even could weigh in on.

if the legislative can't be trusted who do we turn to. we already have justices, RBG, coming out and saying Trump should be removed regardless of any evidence put in front of her. so we can't trust the Judiciary already. Trump is obviously incompetent so we can't trust him. what else are we supposed to do?

There are measures in place. The Supreme Court doesn't even get involved in impeachment except the chief justice as the supervisor (I forget the official term). so your problem shouldn't be with Kavanaugh. the system as a whole should be your issue, you are just using Kavanaugh as a scapegoat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#12,636
#12,636
RockyTop85 said:
I get what you’re saying, but It’s not the criminal determination that he’s saying shouldn’t happen. It’s the time-consuming nature of an investigation and if we’ve learned anything congress can drag out an investigation.

Again, this all assumes that impeachment is more than an empty threat which I would confidently argue it is not.
Click to expand...
Trump isn't going to be investigating himself.

imagine outside the scope of Trump. pick your favorite president, and picture them in this partisan nightmare. the "resistance" could bury ANY president under mountains of cases to keep him from doing anything. something we are already seeing.

they aren't and shouldn't be immune to it, it just gets deferred until Congress gets its act together. again bark up their tree not Kavanaugh, he has nothing to do with impeachment. and even if his view somehow wins out he still isn't touching Congress. it all starts and ends there.
 
#12,639
#12,639
RockyTop85 said:
“Even the lesser burdens of a criminal investigation— including preparing for questioning by criminal investigators— are time-consuming and distracting. Like civil suits, criminal investigations take the President’s focus away from his or her responsibilities to the people. And a President who is concerned about an ongoing criminal investigation is almost inevitably going to do a worse job as President.” -Brett Kavanaugh, 2009

He’s saying the president should not be subject to investigation while in office.

You’ve both got it backwards: without investigation, he would never be removed.
Click to expand...

He’s saying POTUS shouldn’t be subject to criminal investigations by local Leo and such.
 
#12,642
#12,642
BearCat204 said:
If he would have said anything different, he would he been ripped for it. She sounded sincere in the testimony.............................until people started actually checking the crap that was coming from her mouth.
Click to expand...
Pretty much. She was handled delicately during the hearing and shortly after for that reason. Right, wrong, or sideways.

Once the info starts leaking out that puts dents in her credibility that idea starts going away.
 
#12,646
#12,646
BowlBrother85 said:
Just keep in mind that the day after the hearing, Trump called Ford "a very credible witness" who provided "very compelling" testimony.
Click to expand...

You guys are too much , Blast him when he’s being presidential ( showing sympathy ) Blast him when he’s not ( calling her out on the facts ) . But it’s expected .
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol and T-TownVol
#12,650
#12,650
evillawyer said:
Uh, what?

‘I don’t think their mother breast-fed them’: GOP senator attacks Democrats who oppose Kavanaugh
Click to expand...

Tsk tsk. Context and entire quote is everything. Misleading title is misleading. While probably not the best setup line, he was working towards the raw meat.

Good to see youre back in the water pail job though!

“These are people — I’m not gonna name names — but I’m not sure they have a soul,” Kennedy said. “I don’t think their mother breast-fed them.”

Carlson broke his serious expression and laughed.

“I think they went right to raw meat,” Kennedy concluded.
Click to expand...
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top