omghulkhands
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2010
- Messages
- 12,147
- Likes
- 14,530
I mean...C'mon....a 50 year old Jordan beat MKG 1-on-1
Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, 19, of Charlotte Bobcats says he lost to Michael Jordan, 49, in one-on-one game - ESPN
They may not understand how good he really was.
Jordan was a very good NBA player and, obviously, the case can and is made that he's the single greatest basketball player of all time.
However, even in his prime, I don't think he would have been absolutely indomitable in a one-on-one matchup at the local gym against some other wildly-talented players.
I can think of at least 20 people that would have given Jordan a solid run for his money at whatever age you consider to be his prime.
20 incoming freshman? I highly doubt it...
And dont forget, he was also a defensive player of the year in the NBA to go along with the scoring titles. I would bet he was a beast in 1 on 1.
Hahaha, no, not 20 incoming freshman. Probably should have specified that. 20 players since Jordan last played for the Bulls (or, if that list became weak, all-time). I understand that Jordan was great defensively; after all, he's not widely considered the greatest ever for no reason.
Nonetheless, there are people who I wouldn't be surprised to see defeat Jordan in a prime vs. prime matchup.
Jordan was a very good NBA player and, obviously, the case can and is made that he's the single greatest basketball player of all time.
However, even in his prime, I don't think he would have been absolutely indomitable in a one-on-one matchup at the local gym against some other wildly-talented players.
I can think of at least 20 people that would have given Jordan a solid run for his money at whatever age you consider to be his prime.