If you think Sark will take them to a perennial powerhouse, you’d sadly mistaken. We can learn from this: don’t fire coaches to placate the fanbase until you have a truly solid hire. Sark isn’t a solid hire and I predict he’ll be fired by year 3 because he’ll have similar runs to Herman’s.Hey UT Chancellor, Board Members, Boosters, Fulmer and likes. Look what our Lil Bro Texas has done. They took UT brand. They almost have our colors. And now they're showing us how bad they want to get back to being perennial powerhouse. Get a pad and take some notes.
So Texas will fire a guy who has gone 32-18, played for a conference title, won four bowls in four years, including a Sugar Bowl but we cannot move on from a guy that has gone 16-19 and has one lucky comeback bowl win? This complacency is why our program is where it is at right now.
It doesn’t seem like good hire to me. I mean I get the frustration with Herman, but if you go and read up on Sark’s tenures at Washington and USC, they weren’t overly impressive either. 34-29 at Washington and then fired after a 9 win season at USC because he’s an openly admitted alcoholic. Screams spur of the moment, dumb decision by Texas AD.
Okay? The question is not if he’s better than Pruitt, a lot of people would be on that list. The post I was responding to said they’d take Herman in a heartbeat. There’s nothing in his resume to suggest that he’d be successful here. Again if he couldn’t get it done at Texas, which is arguably the best job in the country and in a much weaker conference, what makes you think that he’d be good here?
It doesn’t seem like good hire to me. I mean I get the frustration with Herman, but if you go and read up on Sark’s tenures at Washington and USC, they weren’t overly impressive either. 34-29 at Washington and then fired after a 9 win season at USC because he’s an openly admitted alcoholic. Screams spur of the moment, dumb decision by Texas AD.
lol... What I’m saying is don’t hold them up as some sort of example. They’ve been trying to buy success since they ran Mack Brown off 12 years ago and they’ve consistently fallen on their face just like we have.Oh so they should have held on to Charlie Strong. Makes sense.
Herman was 8 points from a perfect 10-0 season this year. Texas lost to TCU by 2, Iowa State by 3, and tied Oklahoma in regulation, and wound up losing in 4 overtimes. They only needed 3 more points, 4 more points, and 1 more point to be perfect. Texas is nuts to fire him.No thanks. If you can’t get it done at Texas, you’re not going to be successful at Tennessee.
It’s coach firing 101. Heck,LSU hired orgeron, y’all remember that? I thought he was about on par with Derek Dooley, I honestly did.So they dump a guy who has a coaching record of 54-22 and 5-0 in bowl games for a guy who couldn't cut it at USC (was a alcoholic) and a coaching record of 46-35 and 2-2 in bowl games. Just because he was a good OC at Alabama, hell Butch Jones would be a good OC with all that talent. Thats a move that sets a program back 10 years. Say hello to mediocrity Texas.
If you think Sark will take them to a perennial powerhouse, you’d sadly mistaken. We can learn from this: don’t fire coaches to placate the fanbase until you have a truly solid hire. Sark isn’t a solid hire and I predict he’ll be fired by year 3 because he’ll have similar runs to Herman’s.
lol... What I’m saying is don’t hold them up as some sort of example. They’ve been trying to buy success since they ran Mack Brown off 12 years ago and they’ve consistently fallen on their face just like we have.
I meant AD as the athletic department as a whole, not necessarily just the AD himself. But I will say, if you go and read the statement, it sounds like the AD made the call. I’m sure he was pressured, but it stills feels like a firing to make the fans happy. But it’ll backfire.Pretty sure the Texas AD doesn’t make that kind of decision.
Agreed. Texas is in this position to begin with because they got impatient and lost faith in Mack Brown to right the ship. He would have. Their basketball program would also be better off today if they had just left Barnes alone (but thankfully for us, they didn't).Because throwing a temper tantrum and rolling the dice on another coaching change has worked so well for them the last 10 years.
I get wanting to see change. But how many times do you have to see crappy administrations and booster meddling do the same thing over and over again?