House|RockyTop
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2024
- Messages
- 684
- Likes
- 1,640
I didn’t mean to say that and haven’t heard that. I’ve heard they are very happy and believe they got a great coach. I might never know if that was their number one or not. I’ve known since the beginning some of the definite “no” candidates, but still don’t know the hire.
The thing about that is and I am not saying you stated it this way intentionally but some of the supposedly definitely “no” candidates were not under consideration. If any sources are using coaches as a definite “no” that weren’t involved in the process how can they clearly say one or the other way if this was DW top choice.
But speaking from the standpoint of education/athletic administration at a public institution, there is no feasible way the AD was turned down by multiple candidates in a 72 hour window for this job. It just doesn’t not work that way. For example, they could’ve interviewed 4 to 5 candidates in 24-48 hours. Once those interviews concluded, you reach out to your top 1-2 or 1-3 candidates. You make an offer to likely one of them and again give them time to decide if they will accept or not. There is no way DW interviewed a candidate and then only a few hours later they came informed DW they were rejecting the offer. This person would sit down with their agent and decide if the terms meet their expectations. Professional do their due diligences before making final decisions. But let’s say he was turned down, so now we are to believe DW hurried to the 2nd and 3rd option which also said “no?” All in 72 hours? That doesn’t add up.
I believe somewhere in the middle there were 2-3 candidates they really liked. It’s possible they got #1 or #2. I think we already know that #3 has been leaked. We’ll find out at some point.
Last edited: