Smokin’ hot. Criteria #1, of course.I am curious. Why is her name being brought up? Because she looks good?
noSmokin’ hot. Criteria #1, of course.
Might use her looks to get fans to the arena.
(And, she is something like 244-41 as a coach, and everyone speaks about her high character and her relationship skills and all that. Doubt she’s the choice, but c’mon, might as well consider everyone and then choose the right one.)
She shouldn’t even be considered as a serious candidate.Smokin’ hot. Criteria #1, of course.
Might use her looks to get fans to the arena.
(And, she is something like 244-41 as a coach, and everyone speaks about her high character and her relationship skills and all that. Doubt she’s the choice, but c’mon, might as well consider everyone and then choose the right one.)
a big huge no. She would have absolutely zero success here.Smokin’ hot. Criteria #1, of course.
Might use her looks to get fans to the arena.
(And, she is something like 244-41 as a coach, and everyone speaks about her high character and her relationship skills and all that. Doubt she’s the choice, but c’mon, might as well consider everyone and then choose the right one.)
Walz isn’t coming.Becky Hammon
Jeff Walz
Should be the first two calls. Becky will likely say no, but shes only making 1 million a year in the WNBA.
Walz should be interested, i think he was interested the first two times the job opened. Maybe i read that somewhere idk. Both would be really good hires.
It’s about the players she can bring with her, I don’t care about her record when she didn’t have elite talent.View attachment 631445
I’m not sure she is as a solid hire. Most of all her time was in the pac-12. And she wasn’t all that great before.