volfanhill
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
- Messages
- 35,026
- Likes
- 61,263
Incorrect. When she isnt in jail she has been ordering her staff not to issue them.
This is what I'm getting at - there is more here than sanctity of law issues. It's disdain for her and her beliefs that must be PUNISHED!!!!
I swear I've seen more outrage about this woman than other more significant bad behavior.
She's wrong. She shouldn't be in that job if she won't uphold the law. Contempt of court is appropriate.
I just don't get the pitchforks and torches of the mob that must see her pay.
wasn't not isn't.
We'll see what happens when she isn't.
Also, I believe VNSF was referring to other clerk offices in the surrounding area that she doesn't control. I believe they were within 30 miles of that particular one.
The only people I see making this about her beliefs is the people who are foisting her arbitrary beliefs as an acceptable reason to disobey the judicial orders.
This is what I'm getting at - there is more here than sanctity of law issues. It's disdain for her and her beliefs that must be PUNISHED!!!!
I swear I've seen more outrage about this woman than other more significant bad behavior.
She's wrong. She shouldn't be in that job if she won't uphold the law. Contempt of court is appropriate.
I just don't get the pitchforks and torches of the mob that must see her pay.
What if every clerk in a two hour raidus does the same thing and refuses to issue them? If they allow her to say no then they give permission for every clerk to ignore the Law of the Land.
How do you know fines wouldn't be sufficient?
Why can't she be barred from work but not jailed? Or on probation, or house arrest? Why no option for bail? Is she a flight risk?
That is your outrage? I think it's over the top.
The problem here is that once released, does she start over with violating the court order? The only reason the license was issued is because she was in jail. If she had been out, she would have once again prevented anyone in the office from issuing it.
Are the Taliban comments over the top? Most definitely.
Should she have went to jail? Most definitely.
Should she be released? Most definitely.
Will she go back? Most definitely.
Some other gay couple will show up in her office to get a marriage license just to see if she will now comply with the court order.
I'm a bit surprised no one has mentioned her in four days.
More notably than her is the fact that a number of presidential hopefuls are rallying behind her and specifically supporting her defiance of the judicial order that she and her employees recognize the SCOTUS ruling over what most would consider a cornerstone of the American society, the Constitution. #runonsentence
So far Jindal, Cruz and Huck are all down with Kim's Westboro'esqe shenanigans. In fact Huck's visit to the Carter County Jail is causing the small town to close schools due to traffic and road closures due to his photo op visit.
When did it become OK for presidential candidates to condone and encourage citizens to ignore the Constitution and disobey judges?
Who's saying she should be allowed to say no? In the end she's the only person who did this, looks like everyone that requested a license has gotten one (why she is being released).
We'll see if she returns to her old ways, until then what VNSF said was correct and while people have been inconvenienced they have gotten their licenses and this woman has done time in jail.
You think no bail was appropriate? What's the logic?
If she returns to her ways she'll be punished again. I would imagine a court could bar her from her job.
Ah, my bad.
So I to assume there are no marriage licenses being issued in that particular part of Kentucky since she's in jail?