85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 31,876
- Likes
- 62,419
So you think it was a strategy to actually invite a woke attack from the Left? Not an attempt to look “tough”?I don’t agree that they should be fired at all. The concept has proven effective in right wing politics, she’s the one ****ing it up.
She was governor in 2020, unless the state got mauled by COVID, she shouldn’t need to establish that she can make hard choices. She’s got a record she can run on. But the stupid, superficial people who are making the Republican Party go right now aren’t really interested in records. Post- Dobbs and Bruen, I think a lot of politicians are struggling to find effective ways to appeal to large swaths of that group.
One way that’s proven effective is to lean into cultural wedges to portray themselves as the victim of woke cancel culture to catch a bump from the reflexive opposition to all things left.
Making herself the proxy by which the woke left effectively calls all people who have had to put down working dogs “puppy murderer” may be too niche, but it’s a proven concept.
But she’s too much of a politician at heart and instead of looking the outrage in the face and being belligerent about it, she got scared of the hits she was taking and went on the defensive and started playing damage control by justifying her actions, which is the worst possible thing she could have done. Instead of being a champion for rural culture, she has tacitly admitted that she thinks it’s something to be ashamed of.
She’s flailing. Whatever the strategy was.