Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

#3,028
#3,028
Franklin Pierce said:
Armed activist 'Maserati Mike' joins protests at Kenosha courthouse as Kyle Rittenhouse jury deliberations enter second day: Gun-toting fan is turned away by cops as tensions rise over looming verdict

The protests outside Kenosha courthouse continued on Wednesday with the arrival of an armed man calling himself 'Maserati Mike', as jury deliberations entered a second day in the case of Kyle Rittenhouse.

'Mike' arrived in the black sportscar where he takes his nickname, carrying a megaphone and wearing thin-rimmed glasses and a bow-tie.

'Black Lives Matter is a terrorist organization,' he chanted, before being told by cops to put his gun away.

50616075-10213361-image-a-13_1637168384078.jpg

'Maserati Mike' gets out of his black Maserati at Kenosha courthouse on Wednesday. He was the first protester there and chanted through his megaphone 'Black Lives Matter is a terrorist organization'

50616103-10213361-image-a-1_1637168361309.jpg

'Mike' was wearing a shirt, bow-tie and slacks, as well as a bullet proof vest. He was carrying an assault rifle and megaphone

50622103-10213361-image-a-51_1637186360447.jpg

A Kyle Rittenhouse supporter wearing a '45' hat in reference to 45th President Donald Trump outside the courthouse on Wednesday

Armed protester named 'Maserati Mike' joins protests outside Kenosha courthouse | Daily Mail Online
Click to expand...
Who knew activism was so lucrative? I mean besides Jesse, and Al... and Patrice... and.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boca Vol
#3,029
#3,029
utvols88 said:
Shot taking at people sending someone out in hopes to smear a nomination to spit in the face of every rape victim past present and future? Spare us your "iTz JuSt YeR pArTiSaN" on that.

If the lady that Blake was involved with has the same motivations, she can go to hell too. But one had true partisanship influence and the other had zero outside influence. They are not the same. That doesn't indict Blake but it's a ridiculous comparison

Edit: I may misremember but I recall you being pretty fair about the whole Kavanaugh issue. I just think it's a bad comparison.
Click to expand...
I doubt she was trying to ruin Blake’s political career or lifetime tenure aspirations, but I can think of various other ulterior motives that would cause someone to fabricate or exaggerate an accusation like that, particularly when they have a relationship history or share a child, but that’s a pretty lengthy discussion.

I don’t know if my views on Kavanaugh were considered reasonable at the time. I wanted the Ford accusation investigated with the understanding that that would basically just be interviews; thought some of the comments about her here were gross; thought there were reasonable explanations for her never coming forward before (but that it made the accusation impossible to prove); and thought that her initial contact with Feinstein, where she asked to remain anonymous, gave more indication of credibility than how she was being portrayed (and is still portrayed). I thought the lady from Yale seemed plausible, although she was the one that couldn’t say for sure it was even him, but it jumped the shark after that.

I didn’t like him because of some of his DC Circuit opinions, particularly on criminal law. I’ve since decided I was wrong and think he’s actually been one of the more understandable, consistent, and coherent justices. He strikes a nice balance between Roberts’s willingness to bend over backwards to avoid momentous decisions and Thomas’s eagerness to burn everything down to achieve some originalist utopia.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tntar heel and RikidyBones
#3,030
#3,030
Franklin Pierce said:
Armed activist 'Maserati Mike' joins protests at Kenosha courthouse as Kyle Rittenhouse jury deliberations enter second day: Gun-toting fan is turned away by cops as tensions rise over looming verdict

The protests outside Kenosha courthouse continued on Wednesday with the arrival of an armed man calling himself 'Maserati Mike', as jury deliberations entered a second day in the case of Kyle Rittenhouse.

'Mike' arrived in the black sportscar where he takes his nickname, carrying a megaphone and wearing thin-rimmed glasses and a bow-tie.

'Black Lives Matter is a terrorist organization,' he chanted, before being told by cops to put his gun away.

50616075-10213361-image-a-13_1637168384078.jpg

'Maserati Mike' gets out of his black Maserati at Kenosha courthouse on Wednesday. He was the first protester there and chanted through his megaphone 'Black Lives Matter is a terrorist organization'

50616103-10213361-image-a-1_1637168361309.jpg

'Mike' was wearing a shirt, bow-tie and slacks, as well as a bullet proof vest. He was carrying an assault rifle and megaphone

50622103-10213361-image-a-51_1637186360447.jpg

A Kyle Rittenhouse supporter wearing a '45' hat in reference to 45th President Donald Trump outside the courthouse on Wednesday

Armed protester named 'Maserati Mike' joins protests outside Kenosha courthouse | Daily Mail Online
Click to expand...
WTF is this dude wearing
 
#3,036
#3,036
Sandman 423 said:
Would you say that the rioters over the summer played right into the hands of Dems that ginned up racist bs?
Click to expand...

I think two things, one there was and remains racial inequities within the system that need to be addressed. Two, I think liberal forces used events create chaos, anger, distrust and animosity where peaceful protests could have had a productive ending. More unneeded division within the country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tntar heel and Sandman 423
#3,038
#3,038
utvols88 said:
It's not close to the same at all lol. Didn't Blake have a restraining order for the ordeal? Not pinning him as a rapist but they aren't on the same level at all. That's asinine, RT.

Kavanaughs accuser lacked any corroboration from her own named references, had zero recall to anything and didn't even confirm it was for sure Kavaunagh. That entire episode was an embarrassment to this country. That was a clear partisan attempt and it was gross. He got sent through and not a damn democrat cared about the Dr. after that.
Click to expand...
He’s a defense attorney. He would make excuses for any violent criminal if it paid enough
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#3,039
#3,039
ClearwaterVol said:
I think two things, one there was and remains racial inequities within the system that need to be addressed. Two, I think liberal forces used events create chaos, anger, distrust and animosity where peaceful protests could have had a productive ending. More unneeded division within the country.
Click to expand...
I’m not sure how we get back to peaceful protest when some of the first cries heard after any incident is “No Justice, No Peace!”

Maybe I’m missing something there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dovervolz, SpaceCoastVol and NEO
#3,040
#3,040
ClearwaterVol said:
I'd say they played right into the hands of Trump who ginned them up with his bs stop the steal crap.
Click to expand...
Wasn’t crap. If you really think with as incompetent as Biden is, that he really won, I gotta ask you how you crammed so much stupid in one head.

Where there’s smoke, there’s fire and all those states didn’t have “questionable” results enough to warrant an investigation for no reason. Time to get a grip on reality. He wasn’t elected. He was put in place. And THATS why Jan 6th happened. Because America wasn’t built that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dovervolz, SpaceCoastVol and davethevol
#3,041
#3,041
ClearwaterVol said:
I think two things, one there was and remains racial inequities within the system that need to be addressed. Two, I think liberal forces used events create chaos, anger, distrust and animosity where peaceful protests could have had a productive ending. More unneeded division within the country.
Click to expand...
Fair enough.
 
#3,042
#3,042
davethevol said:
One group beats up innocent bystanders and burns down buildings, the other not so much.
Click to expand...


First, your side has run over people and we see in this case shooting some people, and on other occasions recklessly confronting them. Or invading the capitol and threatening to hang the vice president. So don't pretend like violence or threats of violence is one-sided. That's just an idiotic claim by you.

Second, I have said in this thread many times and in other threads that I agree 100 % that protestors who engage in violence ought to be prosecuted, whether they light a couch on fire or throw a rock at a cop. Absolutely 100 % agree.

Why is it SO HARD for the right to condemn people within its ranks that run over peaceful protestors, raid the capitol, or go looking for trouble like this young man did? Why do you insist on circling the wagons around these people that make your cause look so awful? I truly don't get the reticence to disavow them.
 
#3,043
#3,043
1vol8 said:
Wasn’t crap. If you really think with as incompetent as Biden is, that he really won, I gotta ask you how you crammed so much stupid in one head.

Where there’s smoke, there’s fire and all those states didn’t have “questionable” results enough to warrant an investigation for no reason. Time to get a grip on reality. He wasn’t elected. He was put in place. And THATS why Jan 6th happened. Because America wasn’t built that way.
Click to expand...
If you don't think there were enough idiots out there to put President Biden in office, then you should talk to more people. You will be amazed with how few "smart" people have a clue about anything other than what they do everyday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77 and VolsAgainstTheWorld15
#3,045
#3,045
lawgator1 said:
First, your side has run over people and we see in this case shooting some people, and on other occasions recklessly confronting them. Or invading the capitol and threatening to hang the vice president. So don't pretend like violence or threats of violence is one-sided. That's just an idiotic claim by you.

Second, I have said in this thread many times and in other threads that I agree 100 % that protestors who engage in violence ought to be prosecuted, whether they light a couch on fire or throw a rock at a cop. Absolutely 100 % agree.

Why is it SO HARD for the right to condemn people within its ranks that run over peaceful protestors, raid the capitol, or go looking for trouble like this young man did? Why do you insist on circling the wagons around these people that make your cause look so awful? I truly don't get the reticence to disavow them.
Click to expand...

The left does this weird thing where you continue to use an example even after it’s been shown by the evidence to be wrong. Are you really pretending Rittenhouse was unjustified? Or do you just intend to continually use this example regardless of the facts?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77, UT_Dutchman, MemphisVol77 and 2 others
#3,048
#3,048
The judge has ordered MSNBC to be locked out of the courtroom until further notice.

Somehow they were caught following the juror bus after hours to take pictures of those inside that bus to make the public aware of their faces. That's acting reckless.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#3,049
#3,049
lawgator1 said:
First, your side has run over people and we see in this case shooting some people, and on other occasions recklessly confronting them. Or invading the capitol and threatening to hang the vice president. So don't pretend like violence or threats of violence is one-sided. That's just an idiotic claim by you.

Second, I have said in this thread many times and in other threads that I agree 100 % that protestors who engage in violence ought to be prosecuted, whether they light a couch on fire or throw a rock at a cop. Absolutely 100 % agree.

Why is it SO HARD for the right to condemn people within its ranks that run over peaceful protestors, raid the capitol, or go looking for trouble like this young man did? Why do you insist on circling the wagons around these people that make your cause look so awful? I truly don't get the reticence to disavow them.
Click to expand...
How does one tell peaceful protesters who just want to shout at them and bang on the hoods of their cars from protestors who shout at them and then drag them out their cars and assault them?


The answer to that question is you can't, so a being it impossible you bet on the side of self preservation or roll the dice and hope your decision doesn't put you or your kids in jeopardy. It's a horrible decision to have to make. Who is ultimately to blame for putting one in that position?

Simple strategy is stay out of the road. If you don't you invite the decision the drivers are forced to make.
 
#3,050
#3,050
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top