Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

Got to respect the jury's decision and there is nothing to be done about the past.

I do sincerely hope this does not embolden others to do what Rittenhouse did in the future. Just asking for trouble.

I absolutely agree. But I also hope more
Is done in the future to prevent this environment from occurring. If there’s no threat from protestors to private property, then there’s no need to defend it.
 
so one of the complaints in the MSNBC piece is that the jury was all white. I fully recognize that a jury of your peers could include any race but I presume the author would want all or mostly black jurors if the defendant or any of the victims were black. Given all parties were white shouldn't that author see that as the correct make up of the jury (it's a rhetorical question - I know the answer).
 
  • Like
Reactions: jp1 and 0nelilreb
Rittenhouse is already on the phone with Sandmanns lawyer.


This dude will bank.

Book deal written by ghost writer.

Lawsuits against the media that will get settled out of court.

Speaking jobs.

Talk show.

Future in politics if he wants it.

He is now the Greta of the right. Instead of a big old boat though it will be a jacked up 4X4 blowing diesel as he travels from rural area to rural area.
 
I'm a little surprised. As long as it took, I was thinking the jury would hit him with some of the lesser included charges. But I suppose if you're going to come to the right conclusion, it doesn't matter how long it takes to get there.

What would be the lesser charge?
 
What would be the lesser charge?

There was a laundry list. The official charges were the top of the heap, but he could have been found guilty of most if not all of the less serious versions of those charges. Negligent homicide would be an example.
 
Got to respect the jury's decision and there is nothing to be done about the past.

I do sincerely hope this does not embolden others to do what Rittenhouse did in the future. Just asking for trouble.

The bad precedent angle is an odd here. Wouldn’t charging him with murder be the actual bad precedent because you’re now saying you can just randomly attack gun owners at will without repercussion?

I’m genuinely curious about your take on this case in general. Did you see any evidence that eluded to his guilt?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ButchPlz

VN Store



Back
Top