Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

Well, it does take a minute to get those busses loaded and let everyone know where all the bricks and fire starting items are stashed.

Yep - all these people will be traveling to get involved in a volatile situation; some of them armed...to protest the acquittal of someone they see as traveling to get involved in a volatile situation while armed.
 
FEk5EVpWQAAY8x5
 


So now the mayor and the sheriffs are in a lurch.

They know that if they sit back and do nothing then people wanting to stop it will feel empowered by this ruling and head in to protect the city. You will probably have a rinse and repeat scenario here and now we are in a never ending cycle.


The local police must step in now and do their jobs or else this is going to be the Wild West and we are going to have mass shootings in the streets.
 
CNN on the steps of the courthouse stirring the pot as usual. They need to up their ratings so expect them to stoke the fires and pray for more riots. F’ing idiots
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol
I'm a little surprised. As long as it took, I was thinking the jury would hit him with some of the lesser included charges. But I suppose if you're going to come to the right conclusion, it doesn't matter how long it takes to get there.

Jurors were planning their escape route like the SEC refs after the Ole Miss vs Tennessee game.
 
There was a laundry list. The official charges were the top of the heap, but he could have been found guilty of most if not all of the less serious versions of those charges. Negligent homicide would be an example.

Except there’s that little self defense thing. If anything the thugs committed negligent suicide.
 
So now the mayor and the sheriffs are in a lurch.

They know that if they sit back and do nothing then people wanting to stop it will feel empowered by this ruling and head in to protect the city. You will probably have a rinse and repeat scenario here and now we are in a never ending cycle.


The local police must step in now and do their jobs or else this is going to be the Wild West and we are going to have mass shootings in the streets.

I guess we’ll see if law enforcement will be allowed to do their jobs this time around, or if they’ll be told to stand down again.
 
So now the mayor and the sheriffs are in a lurch.

They know that if they sit back and do nothing then people wanting to stop it will feel empowered by this ruling and head in to protect the city. You will probably have a rinse and repeat scenario here and now we are in a never ending cycle.


The local police must step in now and do their jobs or else this is going to be the Wild West and we are going to have mass shootings in the streets.
That's just it though. This is more a referendum on the Democrat defund movement than anything else. You WANT the police to be the ones that handle it. I hope they do this time around. If it happens again then 🤷
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO
so one of the complaints in the MSNBC piece is that the jury was all white. I fully recognize that a jury of your peers could include any race but I presume the author would want all or mostly black jurors if the defendant or any of the victims were black. Given all parties were white shouldn't that author see that as the correct make up of the jury (it's a rhetorical question - I know the answer).

Which isn’t even true. One of 12 was not white.
 
Except there’s that little self defense thing. If anything the thugs committed negligent suicide.

I'm not arguing for any of the lesser included charges. The jury reached the correct verdicts. I had simply been thinking that the long deliberations would lead to a conviction on one or more of the lessers.
 
so one of the complaints in the MSNBC piece is that the jury was all white. I fully recognize that a jury of your peers could include any race but I presume the author would want all or mostly black jurors if the defendant or any of the victims were black. Given all parties were white shouldn't that author see that as the correct make up of the jury (it's a rhetorical question - I know the answer).

That’s as much the prosecution’s fault as any else’s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
so one of the complaints in the MSNBC piece is that the jury was all white. I fully recognize that a jury of your peers could include any race but I presume the author would want all or mostly black jurors if the defendant or any of the victims were black. Given all parties were white shouldn't that author see that as the correct make up of the jury (it's a rhetorical question - I know the answer).
Well, black people make up 13% of the population. There are 12 jurors so 13% of 12 is basically a person and a half so as long as 1-2 black people are pat of the jury then you’re right in line with the percentage of total population. MSNBC doesn’t want to see that though as it has to be 50-50 or else it’s clearly racism. Idiots.
 

VN Store



Back
Top