Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

[southgatevol]

He wasn't trying to kill the kid.
He was just stupid enough to give the kid enough room to claim he was scared and for a jury to buy it.

How do you know he wasn't? How could Rittenhouse know he wasn't? Does not seem rational or reasonable.

 

[Vol423]

not in the least.
My preference would be none of them die.
Given the multiple levels of stupidity, the second best option would have been for the first two to take each other out.

A week has gone by, and Luther is still in here continuing to post this foolishness about wishing that a kid that did everything legally was dead.

 

[Vol423]

I am not saying it wasn't legal.
It most certainly should have been illegal.
And it most certainly was stupid.

WHAT specifically should have been illegal?

 

[Vol423]

Trying to stop what you think to be an active shooter would be what some might call brave and admirable.
But stupid nonetheless.

I don't think you understand the meaning of the term "active shooter". That term means somebody that is actively shooting.

 

[Rickyvol77]

He wasn't trying to kill the kid.
He was just stupid enough to give the kid enough room to claim he was scared and for a jury to buy it.

What makes you think someone who uses a weapon to try and bash someone’s head in isn’t trying to kill them or cause then serious bodily harm?

 

[Rickyvol77]

He wasn't trying to kill the kid.
He was just stupid enough to give the kid enough room to claim he was scared and for a jury to buy it.

So you don’t believe kyle was scared for his life? You clearly have no understanding of law

 

[Rickyvol77]

Of course not, she would have every right and reason to defend herself and I would hope she killed him.
You're comparing apples to hippopotami.

It’s literally the exact same thing

 

[hndog609]

Do I need to quote you again? Clearly you are supporting this kid dying. Unless you’re implying you wanted them to go on a date?

Well, one was a pedophile and the other was a minor so there's an argument for that being Looth's angle.

His trying to defend this "both be taken out for being "stupid" stance when one side is a full blown multi count pedophile sex offender with list of other crimes vs a guy that was 100% legal in every aspect and trying to get away. This is the equivalency he's trying to draw.

 

[luthervol]

WHAT specifically should have been illegal?

For a 17 year old to openly carry a gun down a city street.

 

[southgatevol]

Well, one was a pedophile and the other was a minor so there's an argument for that being Looth's angle.

His trying to defend this "both be taken out for being "stupid" stance when one side is a full blown multi count pedophile sex offender with list of other crimes vs a guy that was 100% legal in every aspect and trying to get away. This is the equivalency he's trying to draw.

Rational?

 

[luthervol]

Do I need to quote you again? Clearly you are supporting this kid dying. Unless you’re implying you wanted them to go on a date?

I'll try to break it down to a level you can process.
I was for the kid making better decisions that would have avoided the senseless killings. Once he stupidly put himself in the position he found himself and decided to shoot and kill a person because he "felt" threatened, it would have been good by me had they taken each other out. It would have saved the life of the guy with a skateboard if nothing else.

 

[hog88]

For a 17 year old to openly carry a gun down a city street.

Why?

 

[hog88]

I'll try to break it down to a level you can process.
I was for the kid making better decisions that would have avoided the senseless killings. Once he stupidly put himself in the position he found himself and decided to shoot and kill a person because he "felt" threatened, it would have been good by me had they taken each other out. It would have saved the life of the guy with a skateboard if nothing else.

IMO the rioters (who were adults) put themselves in an even stupider position.

 

[luthervol]

I don't think you understand the meaning of the term "active shooter". That term means somebody that is actively shooting.

How much time must elapse between shootings for it to no longer be classified an active shooting?
15 seconds?
1 minute?
3 minutes?
There may be some confusion among the general public. It would be great if you could set us straight.

 

[luthervol]

It’s literally the exact same thing

Literally not even close.

 

[luthervol]

Why?

Because he's a kid.

 

[hog88]

Because he's a kid.

Kids should have the ability to defend themselves?

 

[luthervol]

IMO the rioters (who were adults) put themselves in an even stupider position.

The levels are stupidity fluctuated between the four. Rittenhouse was at least number two.

 

[luthervol]

Kids should have the ability to defend themselves?

No one said otherwise.

 

[southgatevol]

I'll try to break it down to a level you can process.
I was for the kid making better decisions that would have avoided the senseless killings. Once he stupidly put himself in the position he found himself and decided to shoot and kill a person because he "felt" threatened, it would have been good by me had they taken each other out. It would have saved the life of the guy with a skateboard if nothing else.

Whose life is worth more?

 

[luthervol]

Putting out some more Christmas lights.
Taking my extra mag......I'm close to Atlanta after all.

 

[Rickyvol77]

Literally not even close.

Please state the differences from legal and moral standpoints

 

[hog88]

The levels are stupidity fluctuated between the four. Rittenhouse was at least number two.

Not the way I see it. He's still alive.

 

[southgatevol]

The levels are stupidity fluctuated between the four. Rittenhouse was at least number two.

Apparently #4....

 

[Rickyvol77]

How much time must elapse between shootings for it to no longer be classified an active shooting?
15 seconds?
1 minute?
3 minutes?
There may be some confusion among the general public. It would be great if you could set us straight.

There was no active shooting though.