Not too general at all. The whole schtick was designed to be divisive. The silly name calling, the demonizing of the other side, the expressed aversion to compromise.
Oh wait! You mean there has been name calling! Demonizing of the other side! Unwillingness to compromise! And you believe this only occurs on the right? Peoples' exhibit 1:
luthervol said:
Which side of the divide is most steeped in ignorance is obvious
And if we needed more evidence of divisiveness by the right, Peoples' exhibit 2:
It's the foundation of Trumpism and how our society was conditioned to actually nominate and elect such a horrendously despicable human. The people who were pre-conditioned actually laughed at the repulsiveness.
I have to admit, I do not have a clue as to what the second line means, but appears to be intended as an insult. To someone. Maybe.
I listened to Rush Limbaugh over the years as I used to drive a considerable amount. I have to say it appears you listened to him very little, if at all, and got your talking points from others who did not listen to him either. Rush was unfailingly polite and respectful to everyone. He actively encouraged those with opposing points of view to call and they would be moved to the head of line. You might want to look up some recent videos of his producer "Snerdly" that are available. Based on your characterization of the man, you know absolutely nothing about him.
With regards to FOX, they certainly have their share of ideologues. I admit I cannot stand to listen to Sean Hannity, but do give him props for being a pretty good interviewer, when he is not interrupting his guest. I Like Gutfeld, the Five, Outnumbered and Tucker, although Tucker can also kind of go off the rails sometimes. They are certainly no worse than CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC and the rest. Those are just plain laughable. CNN could not make a truthful report if their lives depended on it.