Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

[KB5252]

Cornered? Rittenhouse was never cornered by anyone he shot.

The video proves otherwise.

 

[AirVol]

Missionary Ridge has them. I had a buddy that lived up there and his dog dug up a cannonball one night while we were out drinking beers on the patio. Lots of cool civil war era stone walls up there too.

That’s cool. Yeah he knows about Missionary Ridge but he doubts anyone would let him dig in their yard. I’ve told him to tell the owner he would let them have some of the finds, that works a lot for me.

 

[AirVol]

Shiloh park ?

Is that near Chattanooga? I know where the Battle of Shiloh is but is there a park named that near Chattanooga?

 

[MontyPython]

and your point? Or are you trying to tell us you were an angelic teenager that never made any poor decisions in a heated moment thus you have no frame of reference to doing dumb crap?

Never punched a girl. Never known ANY guy who has punched a girl. Fair to say, I believe, that Rittenhouse has mental issues.

 

[utvolpj]

Here is a perfect example where the poster did absolutely no research but decided to convict anyways

Over a year has passed. Still true

 

[MontyPython]

Well maybe you'll get a conviction. Highly doubt it but there's always hope.

Unlikely. Pretty much everything I read opines that the self-defense claim will win.

I mean, hey, OJ got off completely as well - for nearly cutting his girlfriend's head clean off.

 

[volinbham]

Never punched a girl. Never known ANY guy who has punched a girl. Fair to say, I believe, that Rittenhouse has mental issues.

none of that is material to the trial - just as George Floyd's prior assaults on a pregnant woman was not material to the trial of the cops that caused his death.

 

[hog88]

Unlikely. Pretty much everything I read opines that the self-defense claim will win.

You can always go protest if it doesn't go your way. I'm sure you'll have plenty of company.

 

[MontyPython]

Right, he only threatened to kill people, chased a guy with a gun, cornered him, then attempted to grab the gun. He was then shot. That isn't cold blooded murder.

The "cornered him" phrase again... where y'all coming up with this? Rittenhouse was never cornered. If you believe otherwise, link it.

 

[Gandalf]

He was reliving it moment by moment exactly the way his brain had video recorded it happening. Immediately after that series of events the shock hits and the brain records differently. It’s why the memory images of running towards police were a bit less emotional to recall but also why those event memories don’t have a lot of peripheral details.

I’m kinda glad there are a couple of first responders on the jury that understand what Kyle went through on the stand.

Yeah, he wasn’t crying, he was reliving the panic attack he had that night

 

[hog88]

The "cornered him" phrase again... where y'all coming up with this? Rittenhouse was never cornered. If you believe otherwise, link it.

Wasn't the kid on the ground? That is pretty much cornered.

 

[volinbham]

none of that is material to the trial - just as George Floyd's prior assaults on a pregnant woman was not material to the trial of the cops that caused his death.

EDIT: It's not confirmed thats Rittenhouse per the article.

 

[KB5252]

The "cornered him" phrase again... where y'all coming up with this? Rittenhouse was never cornered. If you believe otherwise, link it.

Watch the video, no links needed.

 

[RockyTop85]

As in?

So, there are probably better ideas, but mine are intended to make it more of a critical thinking exercise and less of a rubber stamp process:

1. Having an impartial magistrate or judge oversee grand jury proceedings and be the one to offer advice about the elements and defenses would be one idea.

2. Introducing some sort of adversarial element to the process, like what some have proposed for the FISA process.

3. Setting time limits and issuing no-bills when officers fail to be present without an excuse for consecutive scheduled presentations.

I could go on about the reasons why these are the ones that come to mind for me, but it’d be a long post.

 

[ButchPlz]

Right, he only threatened to kill people, chased a guy with a gun, cornered him, then attempted to grab the gun. He was then shot. That isn't cold blooded murder.

This stuff is literally clear on video.

I cannot imagine being as brainwashed and hateful as these people are.

 

[0nelilreb]

Is that near Chattanooga? I know where the Battle of Shiloh is but is there a park named that near Chattanooga?

No I was teasing .. don’t do it lol

 

[Rickyvol77]

PTSD eh? I wonder if the GIRL Rittenhouse punched in the face suffers the same.

Video shows Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse punching a girl: report

So what. Irrelevant to the case

 

[0nelilreb]

The "cornered him" phrase again... where y'all coming up with this? Rittenhouse was never cornered. If you believe otherwise, link it.

The is a second by second account on video of what happened caught in photos by onlookers , the photos I posted are from the video .

 

[volinbham]

So, there are probably better ideas, but mine are intended to make it more of a critical thinking exercise and less of a rubber stamp process:

1. Having an impartial attorney or judge oversee grand jury proceedings and be the one to offer advice about the elements and defenses would be one idea.

2. Introducing some sort of adversarial element to the process, like what some have proposed for the FISA process.

3. Setting time limits and issuing no-bills when officers fail to be present without an excuse for consecutive scheduled presentations.

I could go on about the reasons why these are the ones that come to mind for me, but it’d be a long post.

Any data on what % of cases that are brought to grand juries result in indictments? Seems to be designed to have a very high rate.

I know the FISA cases were astronomically successful though the counter claim was that they only bring cases that are rock solid.

 

[ButchPlz]

EDIT: It's not confirmed thats Rittenhouse per the article.

Wasn't that video released right after all this as part of the media smearjob? I thought it had been confirmed it wasn't him, or even at a school he goes to.

 

[NurseGoodVol]

The funny thing is that isn't the first guy referenced in that article the one brandishing weapons, threatening to cut people's hearts out, calling them the n-bomb, and had a record of child rape?

Also didn't the prosecution directly ask/pressure one of the witnesses into altering his statement? I wonder if it's the same guy.

The way I understand it from testimony already offered
The first guy was setting a dumpster on fire and Rittenhouse extinguished it. That’s when the first verbal threat was noted from rosenbaum to rittenhouse.
The Asst DA, according to testimony from defense witness photographer, attempted several times to convince him to alter his testimony. His recall didn’t match the prosecutions story.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Is this from the trial or old info?

It’s an airtight source you cannot question.

“Per CNN”

 

[ButchPlz]

The way I understand it from testimony already offered
The first guy was setting a dumpster on fire and Rittenhouse extinguished it. That’s when the first verbal threat was noted from rosenbaum to rittenhouse.
The Asst DA, according to testimony from defense witness photographer, attempted several times to convince him to alter his testimony. His recall didn’t match the prosecutions story.

That seems above board.

 

[ButchPlz]

It’s an airtight source you cannot question.

“Per CNN”

 

[NorthDallas40]

I love how MP is dragging out the same stupid ass info that has been picked over and discounted for months but now that he’s touting it somehow it has more weight. Gold Jerry Gold!