The SEC tweet about the new location of the tournament confused me at first because Pensacola is very close to Orange Beach, but it's obviously
a new location. Will it be a better location, not as good, or about the same. I can't say. However, I have loked at online photos of what seems to be the main field at the Ashton Brosnaham Soccer Complex and can't say that I'm impressed. In all three photos that I saw, the field is mostly brown! Brown patches with very little grass. Not good. I don't know what time of the year the photos were taken, but there are two basic problems with a Florida location. First, Florida is hot and so the fields aren't exactly lush to begin with--not compared with more northerly locations that are cooler and get more rain. Second, the tournament is too big--too many teams, too many games--and the field is torn up and has lost quite a bit of grass by the time the semis and finals roll around. As I've mentioned, playing 10 matches on a single field that isn't perfect to begin with is too much. I know the locale, with the beach, is nice for the teams, but quality of field is a bit of pet peeve with me--and with a lot of soccer players. But apparently the conference doesn't have a better alternative. I don't see why the conference can't hold the tournament on a rotating basis at the various SEC schools. That would be a bertter idea to me.
a new location. Will it be a better location, not as good, or about the same. I can't say. However, I have loked at online photos of what seems to be the main field at the Ashton Brosnaham Soccer Complex and can't say that I'm impressed. In all three photos that I saw, the field is mostly brown! Brown patches with very little grass. Not good. I don't know what time of the year the photos were taken, but there are two basic problems with a Florida location. First, Florida is hot and so the fields aren't exactly lush to begin with--not compared with more northerly locations that are cooler and get more rain. Second, the tournament is too big--too many teams, too many games--and the field is torn up and has lost quite a bit of grass by the time the semis and finals roll around. As I've mentioned, playing 10 matches on a single field that isn't perfect to begin with is too much. I know the locale, with the beach, is nice for the teams, but quality of field is a bit of pet peeve with me--and with a lot of soccer players. But apparently the conference doesn't have a better alternative. I don't see why the conference can't hold the tournament on a rotating basis at the various SEC schools. That would be a bertter idea to me.