Large Explosion in downtown Nashville

[Volgolfer1618]

Is your argument that the DNC supporters care about facts? Because that's the point you're making.

They disagrees with facts that go against their politics.

 

[clarksvol00]

Does twitter or parler count?

Only if it's Jack Posobobic's account.

 

[Volgolfer1618]

Yes, most organizations devoted to truth are run by rational and educated people. They overwhelmingly vote Democrat.

Lol, yes they unless those truths going against the CNC talking points.

 

[Ashevolle]

I was told by high ranking DNC members that they had proof Trump was a Russian agent.

Which high ranking DNC members told you that?

 

[Septic]

They disagrees with facts that go against their politics.

Or you disagree with the factcheck.org findings because, stay with me here... they cut against the grain of your politics.

Perhaps you could give some examples of their "bias" you can support with evidence?

Herein lies your problem, they refute your wants and feels with actual research and sources. Stomping your feet and screeching "nu uh!" without supporting why they're wrong makes you look like a sore loser that refuses to accept reality.

 

[volgr]

Which high ranking DNC members told you that?

Probably the same ones that said Benghazi started over an internet video?

 

[Ashevolle]

Probably the same ones that said Benghazi started over an internet video?

Wait, you don't the names of the high ranking DNC leaders that personally told you that?

 

[508mikey]

They released they found some tissue yesterday. If it is him I'd love to know what his motive was, what was he into, why do this?

did they find a tin foil hat by any chance ?

 

[clarksvol00]

Pr*&k, you're not going to accept any proof, so no need to bother.

That escalated quickly.

 

[Septic]

That escalated quickly.

Lashing out with ad hom's is the last bastion of a failed argument.

His was doomed the moment he typed the first word.

 

[Volgolfer1618]

Or you disagree with the factcheck.org findings because, stay with me here... they cut against the grain of your politics.

Perhaps you could give some examples of their "bias" you can support with evidence?

Herein lies your problem, they refute your wants and feels with actual research and sources. Stomping your feet and screeching "nu uh!" without supporting why they're wrong makes you look like a sore loser that refuses to accept reality.

No. I've seen people discuss the politics behind these fact check site, the people who run them and the connections within these groups Personally it doesnt effect me either way. Hey, If we looked up "is septic an D-bag?" I bet that would be accurate.

 

[508mikey]

He probably left a note somewhere

I cant imagine what they will find on his computer

 

[Volgolfer1618]

Lashing out with ad hom's is the last bastion of a failed argument.

His was doomed the moment he typed the first word.

No, there is no reason to go back to post any evidence, you're not going to accept it anyways.

 

[Septic]

No pr*@k. I've seen people discuss the politics behind these fact check site, the people who run them and the connections within these groups Personally it doesnt effect me either way. Hey, If we looked up "is septic an D-bag?" I bet that would be accurate.

So to be clear, your evidence that factcheck.org is biased is based on your personal and anecdotal conversations? And you're going to shore up that gem with more ad hominem attacks?

This isn't a winning strategy son.

 

[Orangeburst]

An important clue for our investigation into his motive.

That was the riddle Costanza had to solve.

 

[volgr]

Wait, you don't the names of the high ranking DNC leaders that personally told you that?

Probably the same ones that backed Clinton's Humanitarian Intervention in Libya.

 

[Volgolfer1618]

So to be clear, your evidence that factcheck.org is biased is based on your personal and anecdotal conversations? And you're going to shore up that gem with more ad hominem attacks?

This isn't a winning strategy son.

Nope, not accurate.

Didn't know truth was an ad hominem attack

 

[Septic]

No, there is no reason to go back to post any evidence, you're not going to accept it anyways.

You're out of your depth here, try the Disney Frozen Message Boards - maybe you'll stand a chance.

Frozen II (2019) - Discuss | MovieChat

 

[Ashevolle]

Probably the same ones that backed Clinton's Humanitarian Intervention in Libya.

So no DNC leaders told you anything.

 

[Volgolfer1618]

You're out of your depth here, try the Disney Frozen Message Boards - maybe you'll stand a chance.

Frozen II (2019) - Discuss | MovieChat

Lol, keep on sheeping.

 

[volgr]

Probably the same ones that backed Clinton's Humanitarian Intervention in Libya.

You know whats odd about this, WikiLeaks released emails showing the fraud surrounding our Libyan intervention, yet Clinton walks free and Assange is in some solitary confined sh1thole. If Trump pardons him, the Left will lose their minds.

But no, really, the Left cares about truth, just trust them.

 

[volgr]

So no DNC leaders told you anything.

I think a few of them even assured me they didnt spy on the Trump campaign.

 

[Septic]

You know whats odd about this, WikiLeaks released emails showing the fraud surrounding our Libyan intervention, yet Clinton walks free and Assange is in some solitary confined sh1thole. If Trump pardons him, the Left will lose their minds.

But no, really, the Left cares about truth, just trust them.

You made a declarative statement.

I was told by high ranking DNC members that they had proof Trump was a Russian agent.

You were asked to expound on that statement yet you keep trying to deflect and redirect from your statement by using whataboutisims and non sequiturs?

 

[Jackcrevol]

Note for women, any man that tells you women should be allowed to play college football, is probably a man you wouldn't want to be alone with.

do you suggest we just grab them back to the cave?

 

[508mikey]

That was the riddle Costanza had to solve.