No.Could it be that LA Tech is doing just fine because Sonny Dykes (good coach I think) walked into a much better situation (at least partially created by Dooley) in a significantly weaker conference?
However, maybe this is a testimony to letting Dooley lay the foundation for the program and then letting someone else build on that foundation (i.e. Sonny Dykes).
Could it be that LA Tech is doing just fine because Sonny Dykes (good coach I think) walked into a much better situation (at least partially created by Dooley) in a significantly weaker conference?
However, maybe this is a testimony to letting Dooley lay the foundation for the program and then letting someone else build on that foundation (i.e. Sonny Dykes).
He has none. Many folks just feel good hatin' on Dooley and believe that getting rid of him is an action in and of itself that will fix everything.
Fortunately those who are actually responsible for that decision are a little wiser.
Dooley has nothing to do with the fact that the current LA Tech team is doing well this year. Except, of course, because he isn't there.
Could it be that LA Tech is doing just fine because Sonny Dykes (good coach I think) walked into a much better situation (at least partially created by Dooley) in a significantly weaker conference?
However, maybe this is a testimony to letting Dooley lay the foundation for the program and then letting someone else build on that foundation (i.e. Sonny Dykes).
Edit: I am not advocating that Sonny Dykes be UT's next coach AT ALL...I am saying let someone follow Dooley (if it comes to that) who will build on the foundation he laid.
Retarded. Very few contributing players on this LA Tech squad were from the Dooley regime. Dykes hit the JUCO ranks hard when he took over. Dooley has nothing to do with their success.OK, you have no information. Just checking.
"This is my anti-polar bear spray, Cleetus"
"But this is the south...there aren't any polar bears for a hundred miles."
"see how well it works?"
:dance2: