Latech is doing just fine without dd

#52
#52
VolFan4Life87 said:
So do we have Shula to thank for Alabama's current dominance? I mean Saban took them to the SEC Championship in year 2, the NC in year 3 and has never had a losing season in all his years of college football.

Dooley is 14-17 in year 3 (4-15 in SEC play). I guess it's all about foundation...
Click to expand...

:hi: :rock: :thumbsup:

Going by the Dooley guys here, we should go grab Shula!
 
#53
#53
LocoVol said:
:hi: :rock: :thumbsup:

Going by the Dooley guys here, we should go grab Shula!
Click to expand...

Not exactly, my point is you don't make a change unless you have a home run hire lined up. If not you keep Dooley. He did make La Tech better and he has made the Vols better. Not good enough certainly but better.
 
#54
#54
My point is even if they are his old players, look what was gotten out of them after he left!!! He's a start up man. not a next level man. No way latech plays a&m that close if dd were there. no way UT does either because dd. He did his best coaching in 2010 for us. The lsu game and the bowl game were excusable. the players responded awesomely and grew. Since then we regressed. this team is on the verge of falling apart just like last year. They don't understand why they're getting their butts kicked every week.
 
#55
#55
volberry said:
My point is even if they are his old players, look what was gotten out of them after he left!!! He's a start up man. not a next level man. No way latech plays a&m that close if dd were there. no way UT does either because dd. He did his best coaching in 2010 for us. The lsu game and the bowl game were excusable. the players responded awesomely and grew. Since then we regressed. this team is on the verge of falling apart just like last year. They don't understand why they're getting their butts kicked every week.
Click to expand...

You may very well be right about that. He took a job no one wanted and the talent is better than when he got here. I also think we should be performing better with that talent. He may not be the guy to get us over the hump but we don't need to change just to change cause it could be worse.
 
#56
#56
DarthVaul said:
You may very well be right about that. He took a job no one wanted and the talent is better than when he got here. I also think we should be performing better with that talent. He may not be the guy to get us over the hump but we don't need to change just to change cause it could be worse.
Click to expand...

There's always some young coach out there. We need to get a clue.
 
#57
#57
OK so it’s pretty obvious by now that orangetanker11 hasn’t done the research and just spouts nonsense. He calls someone out when he has no clue what he is talking about.

So here it is.

Of the 112 players on La Techs roster, 29 of them were recruited by Derek Dooley. 20 of those 29 are in the 2 deep seeing significant playing time.

In case you need more help, that’s nearly have the 2 deep players. So to say they aren’t Dooley’s players or that the foundation he laid there hasn’t helped that program is asinine.
 
#58
#58
DarthVaul said:
OK so it’s pretty obvious by now that orangetanker11 hasn’t done the research and just spouts nonsense. He calls someone out when he has no clue what he is talking about.

So here it is.

Of the 112 players on La Techs roster, 29 of them were recruited by Derek Dooley. 20 of those 29 are in the 2 deep seeing significant playing time.

In case you need more help, that’s nearly have the 2 deep players. So to say they aren’t Dooley’s players or that the foundation he laid there hasn’t helped that program is asinine.
Click to expand...

He didn't lay any foundation. 20 of his recruits are in the two deep, and those players have been coached to win by Dykes. He was a loser in the WAC, just like he is a loser here. If you are too stupid to defend the loser, then I can't help you.

By the way, I don't spend too much time on this board. I would rather be on the other site that shall not be named.
 
#59
#59
orangetanker11 said:
He didn't lay any foundation. 20 of his recruits are in the two deep, and those players have been coached to win by Dykes. He was a loser in the WAC, just like he is a loser here. If you are too stupid to defend the loser, then I can't help you.

By the way, I don't spend too much time on this board. I would rather be on the other site that shall not be named.
Click to expand...

I'm not defending him just pointing out facts that you were too lazy to look up. I'm not going to call you names because you don't agree or don't know how to do the research.

Ive said several times I would be fine with a change as long as its a home run done deal before they let Dooley go. We don't need another fiasco like last time or it WILL get worse.

Also, you should say if I'm stupid enough to defend the loser. Saying I am too stupid to defend the loser implies I'm not defending him when I should be. :)
 
Last edited:
#60
#60
DarthVaul said:
I'm not defending him just pointing out facts that you were too lazy to look up. I'm not going to call you names because you don't agree or don't know how to do the research.

Ive said several times I would be fine with a change as long as its a home run done deal before they let Dooley go. We don't need another fiasco like last time or it WILL get worse.
Click to expand...
I did do the research. I'm rarely on this site, so if you were too impatient to await a response, that's on you. I'm just sick of the Dooley apologists that constantly grasp at straws to try and prove he isn't a loser.
 
#61
#61
orangetanker11 said:
I did do the research. I'm rarely on this site, so if you were too impatient to await a response, that's on you. I'm just sick of the Dooley apologists that constantly grasp at straws to try and prove he isn't a loser.
Click to expand...

Ok, just remember we all want the same thing we just don't all agree how to get there. Dooley may very well not be the right man for the job but if the change is made and its not the right guy we are screwed. Surely you can agree with that.
 
#62
#62
DarthVaul said:
Ok, just remember we all want the same thing we just don't all agree how to get there. Dooley may very well not be the right man for the job but if the change is made and its not the right guy we are screwed. Surely you can agree with that.
Click to expand...

I agree. However I think we are screwed if he stays. With the money we will be spending, I find it hard to believe we would end up with someone as bad as Dooley.
 
#63
#63
orangetanker11 said:
I agree. However I think we are screwed if he stays. With the money we will be spending, I find it hard to believe we would end up with someone as bad as Dooley.
Click to expand...

The money we will be spending? They big boys weren't willing to cut those checks last time and I'm not at all sure they will be willing to this year. If they are great, if not I think we're better off to stick with Dooley.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top