TennTradition
Defended.
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2006
- Messages
- 16,919
- Likes
- 822
Well, I guess the good news is you think you know more that Dr. Fauci, the WHO, the CDC and a bunch of other scientists studying COVID-19. Kudos to your ego.
The bad news is you're simply wrong.
Here are the facts with supporting links:
How the coronavirus compares with the flu
World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said at a news briefing March 3 that the global case fatality rate for the coronavirus is believed to be about 3.4 percent, higher than the 2.3 percent reported in a China CDC study released in February. But a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine last week found a death rate of 1.4 percent among a group of 1,099 patients, suggesting the rate could be lower than those reported by the WHO and Chinese officials.
“By comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1 percent of those infected,” Tedros said of the global flu caseload during the news briefing.
Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has said that the mortality rate for seasonal flu is 0.1 percent."
The computation of case fatality rate for novel coronavirus (COVID-19) based on Bayes theorem
Principle findings
"The CFR (3.7%) greater than the prior-CFR of 2.2% was evident in LSBHRS impact on the CFR. A dashboard was created to present the CFRs."
Assessment of Deaths From COVID-19 and From Seasonal Influenza
"...Eventually, results from serologic studies will help to determine a more accurate denominator for the case fatality rate of SARS-CoV-2.
At present, the Diamond Princess cruise ship outbreak is one of the few situations for which complete data are available. For this outbreak, the case fatality rate as of late April 2020 was 1.8% (13 deaths out of 712 cases); age adjusted to reflect the general population, the figure would have been closer to 0.5%.1,9 A case fatality rate of 0.5% would still be 5 times the commonly cited case fatality rate of adult seasonal influenza."
# # #
So, as concluded, the *global* case fatality rates of CV19 were previously estimated at 2.2%, then raised to 3.4% and 3.7% based on varying studies.
Here in the US, our case fatality rates have been higher to date (5.4%).
In comparison, the case fatality rate of adult seasonal influenza is about 0.1%
I hope this settles this debate. If not, I have nothing else to add. You're welcome to ignore reality.
First, where in any of that did I contradict CDC/WHO/Fauci?
Let's go back a bit.
You are citing a case fatality rate of 5.4%, and then saying "if you are infected, you have a 5.4% mortality rate." That is a basic conflation of CASE fatality rate and INFECTION fatality rate. They are fundamentally different unless you are measuring (cases are measured infection) EVERY infection. the upper limit of the iFR is the CFR.
Furthermore, the 0.1% for flu is a SYMPTOMATIC fatality rate (the portion of infections that become symptomatic). This is what the CDC material makes clear if you read it. If someone casually refers to it as something other than the sFR, they are technically incorrect. You can take the same official CDC numbers and calculate the flu CASE fatality rate and see that it was 4% last year. That's a meaningless number, but that is what it was.
And in most discussions, that technicality isn't all that important. But, in this discussion - it is critically important. Because we are comparing numbers between diseases....and in one case taking the sFR and the other taking the CFR (which is higher than both the iFR and the sFR). Eventually we'll be able to model out CV19 and get a better estimate on its true iFR. Antibody testing is a good route to that. And from the early work, it seems like the number will end up being around 0.3%.
Please continue this dialogue because you are making some mistakes in your interpretation. I'm sure of it. I don't know if they are purposeful or not. But, I'd love to iron them out.