BigOrangeD
Got Bitcoin?
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2010
- Messages
- 26,636
- Likes
- 20,652
I hope nobody is doing that. That would be dumb. More testing will find more cases. Less testing will find fewer cases. These guys are trying to say we are worse off in the US because we show a higher percentage of cases to our population, The only way to make that comparison is for all countries to do the same per capita testing as we do. It's just basic statistics 101 from our freshman year in college.Not a coincidence that the current decline in testing is resulting in a decline in cases. Sort of foolish for some to hold up fewer cases, alone, as an indicator of the things improving.
Under our existing system, the government is not precluded from this type of regulation.I went and found the actual numbers for swedens and its neighbors. As expected it was worse in deaths, better in economy. Not sure how that can be considered talking out of my but when I backed it up with numbers.
And i love that you assume i dont lift a finger.
Odd for him to go against the grain of the DEM party or are they starting to pivot and see that Trump was right?
The economy is already largely broken I think. As long as it visibly breaks and the stock market falls before Trump leaves office they don’t care. Then they’ll just blame him for every bad decision they make over the next four years. More debt. More govt intrusion.Sooner rather than later these Dems leaders are going have that little light bulb go off above their heads that says in quotes... “ holy hell if we do win the oval and maybe take the senate , we will own all three branches with a crashed and broken economy “ . Whoever is in charge come Jan of 2021 is going to have to take a big ole bite of sh!t pie and there’s no way around it . It will either be deeper in debt or deeper in debt with higher taxes . The 2024 elections will be interesting indeed .
I heard Rush Limbaugh today say that he thinks it’s a ploy. They’ll open up the schools, kids will get sick and then they can shut everything down again and say “see? We tried.”Sooner rather than later these Dems leaders are going have that little light bulb go off above their heads that says in quotes... “ holy hell if we do win the oval and maybe take the senate , we will own all three branches with a crashed and broken economy “ . Whoever is in charge come Jan of 2021 is going to have to take a big ole bite of sh!t pie and there’s no way around it . It will either be deeper in debt or deeper in debt with higher taxes . The 2024 elections will be interesting indeed .
The government can give itself the power ergo it is right to use the power. Again with the circular argument.Truncated to eliminate strawmen and other nonsense:
Under our existing system, the government is not precluded from this type of regulation.
Therefore, it is a prudential/political question.
It is therefore subject to a cost/benefits analysis or whatever other form of prudential analysis you prefer.
That’s just reality.
The Swedish figures that supported your argument so well that you immediately equivocated about them are line items in that analysis. The “source of the loss“ is a line item.
What does it say about your faith in your own proposal that when asked to consider items on the other side of the ledger, you fly off the handle and start making arguments about fictitious government limitations that have never been present in the constitution?
What does it say that when confronted with their absence from the constitution you make some pithy comment about the government granting itself rights?
To me, it says you don’t even believe your own proposal would pass muster under a prudential analysis. Maybe that doesn’t mean you don’t want to lift a finger, but that’s the only answer I can come up with for someone who has to resort to fantasyland nonsense to justify a proposal that would kill thousands.
Sooner rather than later these Dems leaders are going have that little light bulb go off above their heads that says in quotes... “ holy hell if we do win the oval and maybe take the senate , we will own all three branches with a crashed and broken economy “ . Whoever is in charge come Jan of 2021 is going to have to take a big ole bite of sh!t pie and there’s no way around it . It will either be deeper in debt or deeper in debt with higher taxes . The 2024 elections will be interesting indeed .
Oh yeah? How so?
I mean, is in inaccurate because Trump is lying that there will be a vaccine prior to the election?
OR
Is it inaccurate because Trump is lying that he will pressure vaccine makers to rush the process?
In either case, of course, Trump is still a liar.