Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

In previously unreported remarks, Dr Fauci supported the contentious gain-of-function experiments that some now fear might have led to an escape from a Wuhan laboratory causing the Covid-19 pandemic, calling them “important work”. An investigation by The Weekend Australian has also confirmed Dr Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, did not alert senior White House officials before lifting the ban on gain-of-function research in 2017.

Writing in the American Society for Microbiology in October 2012, Dr Fauci acknowledged the controversial scientific research could spark a pandemic.

“In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?” he wrote. “Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision? “Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. “It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.”
Yet a virus lab 12 time zones away... LITERALLY on the other side of the planet... in the middle of nowhere, had an 'accidental' release of a virus in the largest cities in America. That sparked a 'pandemic'. And a miracle vaccine was discovered in warp speed.

Accidental release my aching ass.
 
Yet a virus lab 12 time zones away... LITERALLY on the other side of the planet... in the middle of nowhere, had an 'accidental' release of a virus in the largest cities in America. That sparked a 'pandemic'. And a miracle vaccine was discovered in warp speed.

Accidental release my aching ass.
Seems a little hinky huh?
 
Seems a little hinky huh?
It has from the very beginning. Look at poor high density cities like Mexico City or Mumbai... where millions live literally right on top of one another.... and NY had a huge outbreak right at the beginning.

Yeah.

'natural' oh wait.. now it's 'accidental'.
 


I tell u what Jon..on the macro level many things he said were true regardless of your amazing ideology blinders. Hey we all have them, but you dumbasses missed big on this and many other issues. All cred destroyed.
Atp I am sure their coverage is politically directed, so at least good for them on this one. Not really.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: headhunter15
There’s not an, “ even if “ some things just can be true . The only difference is what we are told to believe . The is shaping up to be the greatest liberal propaganda hoax of our generation. The machine was hitting on all cylinders.

Immigration, Inflation, China, Energy..what else? In all that talk about Trump lying, they have been the biggest liars of them all.
 
I agree the trend showed it was probable we would have another one. Fauci also knew about the dangers of gain of function research.

Hot take. If Biden or Harris wins in 2024, no new “health crisis” happens. If Trump or a Republican wins, another “health crisis” happens.
 
In previously unreported remarks, Dr Fauci supported the contentious gain-of-function experiments that some now fear might have led to an escape from a Wuhan laboratory causing the Covid-19 pandemic, calling them “important work”. An investigation by The Weekend Australian has also confirmed Dr Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, did not alert senior White House officials before lifting the ban on gain-of-function research in 2017.

Writing in the American Society for Microbiology in October 2012, Dr Fauci acknowledged the controversial scientific research could spark a pandemic.

In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?” he wrote. “Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision? “Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. “It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.”

and hence the Fauci problem - he told us the vaccinated should wear masks around other vaccinated people because there was a "small chance" that one could be infected and pass it to others.

his "small chance", "remote chance", "unlikely" are not grounded in some degree of likelihood but rather used to defend whatever practice he so chooses.
 
I agree the trend showed it was probable we would have another one. Fauci also knew about the dangers of gain of function research.
There’s allot out there right now making those connections. With everything leading up to this, I don’t believe this was an undercooked bat soup problem. Jmo
 

VN Store



Back
Top