Leftist whack jobs storm whitehouse


If what you’re saying is true. That they “attacked a building to stop democracy”, wouldn’t they have came armed?

And not, how bad the rhetoric is, is not dependent upon the actions. That seems to be your entire argument “100 people stormed the Capitol so his rhetoric is worse”. Yet you’re unable to point to what the difference in rhetoric was.

My standard is a direct call for violence. Of the ones mentioned, Maxine Waters is very close to incitement. The others are just examples of terrible rhetoric. Odd that you seem unable to condemn any of those
 
You should read aarticles from the actual sources not other sources talking about the articles.

Learn the arguments from those who believe then in earnest. Paraphrased from John Stuart Mill "On the the thought of liberty and discussion"

Thanks for the advice. Doesn’t change the fact that journalist in our country are doing a horrific job.
 
If what you’re saying is true. That they “attacked a building to stop democracy”, wouldn’t they have came armed?

Thankfully, they left their pee shooters at home or at least didn't decide to shoot their way into the Capitol. I think part of this terrorist act was due to opportunity. Capitol police were obviously out numbered not prepared. Which does not make it any less of a crime.

And not, how bad the rhetoric is, is not dependent upon the actions. That seems to be your entire argument “100 people stormed the Capitol so his rhetoric is worse”.

By using quotes, you are implying those are my exact words. Not the case, your quotes are a conflating what I wrote.

Definitely not the entire argument. Go back and read the post with 4 points. I said upfront that the rhetoric itself is not the deciding factor.

Yes, participation is important, Hitler mumbling about Jews with no one to follow would not have led to the Holocaust. If no terrorists had entered the capital then my argument would be weaker or nonexistent. In order to prove insurrection, having actions rather than just words solidifies the argument. Without the actions then you just have speech. Which gets difficult due to freedom of speech.

Yet you’re unable to point to what the difference in rhetoric was.

My standard is a direct call for violence. Of the ones mentioned, Maxine Waters is very close to incitement. The others are just examples of terrible rhetoric. Odd that you seem unable to condemn any of those
Odd that you misquote my post and fail to see my condemnation of Bernie.

I will reiterate my stance on Waters and AOC, I don't follow them. They are not relevant to me. My Senators, Representatives and Presidnet take front stage over Reps that do not hold improtant roles.

Make an argument for Maxine Waters.
 

VN Store



Back
Top