Liberal Dems are so stupid sometimes...

#26
#26
#28
#28
dukes_of_maggard said:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/?page=2
Click to expand...

Yes, well posted. However, most all of the points that are considered false or half true are subjective. Like the apology tour. He did do that, he did bow to Arabs, he did make excuses for this country. Now, whether your fact checker wants to believe that or not, like I said, subjective. The lies that I am talking about are things like DWS being asked about something that she said and looking straight at the camera and saying "I never said that" and then the clip of her saying it being played right behind her. Both sides are full of half truths, it the obvious lies that they get caught in that kill me. The campaign claims to never have spoken to the guy that claims Romney basically killed his wife. Several people were interviewed that said they knew nothing about it, then a recording of the conference call is played where they were speaking directly to the guy. It's that kind of crap I am talking about. Micheal Steele did some of the same stuff but the RNC got rid of him. The DNC applauds this woman as the face of the party. I just don't get "them".
 
#31
#31
BigPapaVol said:
somehow, I suspect that you struggle with that website. While it calls itself a truth checker, it's still a political hack is selectively applying stats.
Click to expand...

As I said, subjective. The crap that the DNC is putting out are blatant lies. It really is funny to hear them say "I didn't do it" and then hear audio of just the opposite. Actually not funny, kind of sickening.
 
#32
#32
TNGlen said:
As I said, subjective. The crap that the DNC is putting out are blatant lies. It really is funny to hear them say "I didn't do it" and then hear audio of just the opposite. Actually not funny, kind of sickening.
Click to expand...


You mean like Romney saying he opposes an individual mandate nationally, except for that editorial he wrote in USA Today three years ago telling Obama to adopt it ... nationally ?
 
#37
#37
lawgator1 said:
You mean like Romney saying he opposes an individual mandate nationally, except for that editorial he wrote in USA Today three years ago telling Obama to adopt it ... nationally ?
Click to expand...

Obama changes his mind on gay marriage in an election year. Romney changes his mind on the individual mandate in an election year.

Oh, the horrors!
 
#39
#39
lawgator1 said:
You mean like Romney saying he opposes an individual mandate nationally, except for that editorial he wrote in USA Today three years ago telling Obama to adopt it ... nationally ?
Click to expand...

Pssssh, anything older than 6 months for a politician is a lifetime ago. :)
 
#40
#40
MG1968 said:
Obama changes his mind on gay marriage in an election year. Romney changes his mind on the individual mandate in an election year.

Oh, the horrors!
Click to expand...

Find a stance Romney has not changed on with the exception of minimum wages which he favors.
 
#42
#42
MG1968 said:
again I ask, so what?
Click to expand...

In my opinion it proves nothing that Romney says can be trusted.

Everyone has a change of mind on things over time but with Romney his stances changed constantly since he ran for the senate in '94.

He has a history,a verifiable record, that shows he bases his stances to whatever he thinks will get him the most votes

He cannot be trusted. He has zero backbone.

Neither can Obama be trusted.
It would be nice to have someone running that will stand on what they say. Neither one of these two will.
 
Last edited:
#45
#45
Gramps said:
In my opinion it proves nothing that Romney says can be trusted.

Everyone has a change of mind on things over time but with Romney his stances changed constantly since he ran for the senate in '94.

He has a history,a verifiable record, that shows he bases his stances to whatever he thinks will get him the most votes

He cannot be trusted. He has zero backbone.

Neither can Obama be trusted.
It would be nice to have someone running that will stand on what they say. Neither one of these two will.
Click to expand...

I agree with you. Im voting for Romney because Obama had his chance and basically things cannot get any worse.
 
#49
#49
tim said:
I agree with you. Im voting for Romney because Obama had his chance and basically things cannot get any worse.
Click to expand...

Romney may make good POTUS, if elected.
His rhetoric sounds like he will but his record does not match his rhetoric.
Actions speak louder than words.
Romneys record scares me so does Obamas.

We need a legit third party desperately.
That would take a lot of change to happen.

The day after this election regardless of who wins we all need to partisanship aside and put pressure on Washington to sit down and get something done for the betterment of America.
Like anything close to this will ever happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top