Limbaugh and the Rams

#76
#76
Do you think the league would allow Olbermann to be a part of buying a team if he could afford to do so?
 
#77
#77
615 Vol said:
Do you think the league would allow Olbermann to be a part of buying a team if he could afford to do so?
Click to expand...


Prolly. But struggling to remember him insulting an entire race over and over and over and over and over and over ....
 
#79
#79
lawgator1 said:
Prolly. But struggling to remember him insulting an entire race over and over and over and over and over and over ....
Click to expand...

you are sounding like a racist yourself implying being against welfare and being for self sufficiancy is anti african american.
 
#81
#81
lawgator1 said:
Prolly. But struggling to remember him insulting an entire race over and over and over and over and over and over ....
Click to expand...

Continually amazed that you persist with half-truths and lies about someone you hate because of his half-truths and lies.

Ah, the wonder of LG
 
#82
#82
Jessie Jackson on New York - "Hymietown." Ray Nagin on NOLA - "Chocolate City." Obama on his grandmother - "Typical white person." Warren Ballentine to Juan Williams on O'Reilly last night - "Get back on the porch Juan." Racists?
 
#83
#83
615 Vol said:
I guess that was my real question. Is this about racial comments are political comments?
Click to expand...

That's a very valid point. Probably both.


droski said:
you are sounding like a racist yourself implying being against welfare and being for self sufficiancy is anti african american.
Click to expand...

It is only if you assume that those programs are inherently tied to a particular race, and that thought process and linkage is BY FAR the most prevalent remaining example of racism in this country, IMO.


BigPapaVol said:
What a crock. Post 'em.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

I did earlier. Its in here somewheres.

volinbham said:
Continually amazed that you persist with half-truths and lies about someone you hate because of his half-truths and lies.

Ah, the wonder of LG
Click to expand...


Now, now, I posted the ones that had been debunked and settled on the ones for which there either was outright proof or in many cases an admission by RL.

volinasheville said:
Jessie Jackson on New York - "Hymietown." Ray Nagin on NOLA - "Chocolate City." Obama on his grandmother - "Typical white person." Warren Ballentine to Juan Williams on O'Reilly last night - "Get back on the porch Juan." Racists?
Click to expand...


JJ's comment was racial (well, ethnic anyway, and he should be and was condemned for it).

Nagin -- now we can into that whole interesting debate of whether a black is racist for making a remarks derisive of black people, generally. Interesting subtopic.

Obama -- I believe in context he was speaking as to typical reaction to racial issue by white persons, right? I think in context it was not derisive of inherent attribute of a race.

Balentine -- not familiar but on the face of it that's bad and he should be rebuked for it.

Not aware of any of them with decades-long record of snide innuendo or outright comments critical of a race for stereotypical stuff. In fact, that may be the worst part of RL's racism -- its really cheap and ordinary. He's not even clever about it.
 
#84
#84
lawgator1 said:
Now, now, I posted the ones that had been debunked and settled on the ones for which there either was outright proof or in many cases an admission by RL.

You are making much more out of his comments then is there - just like RL does. Congrats you are what you criticize.


Nagin -- now we can into that whole interesting debate of whether a black is racist for making a remarks derisive of black people, generally. Interesting subtopic.

Try being a white mayor and saying you want it to be a Vanilla city. See if anyone suggests you are a racist. He was suggesting he wanted the city to be black e.g. whitey stay out.

Obama -- I believe in context he was speaking as to typical reaction to racial issue by white persons, right? I think in context it was not derisive of inherent attribute of a race.

Sure it is (if RLs are) because he's stereotyping reactions to white folk.

Balentine -- not familiar but on the face of it that's bad and he should be rebuked for it.

Not aware of any of them with decades-long record of snide innuendo or outright comments critical of a race for stereotypical stuff. In fact, that may be the worst part of RL's racism -- its really cheap and ordinary. He's not even clever about it.
Click to expand...

You excused several comments by others with reasons why they might not be racist yet you conclude without a doubt that RL is racist. For example, you posted a comment about RLs comments about Spike Lee's Malcolm X. If you look at the context, he's saying why not let the students get the real MALCOLM X experience by looting and bombing ---- things Malcolm X did! He's not saying this is what black people do. It is what MX did and if little Spike wants them to have the full experience then they should emulate MX.
 
Last edited:
#86
#86
volinbham said:
You excused several comments by others with reasons why they might not be racist yet you conclude without a doubt that RL is racist. For example, you posted a comment about RLs comments about Spike Lee's Malcolm X. If you look at the context, he's saying why not let the students get the real MALCOLM X experience by looting and bombing ---- things Malcolm X did! He's not saying this is what black people do. It is what MX did and if little Spike wants them to have the full experience then they should emulate MX.
Click to expand...


Assuming you are correct and that others have made racist statements, and even of one credits them for having a record as consistent as RL on the subject, how would that be supportive of RL's application?
 
#87
#87
lawgator1 said:
It is only if you assume that those programs are inherently tied to a particular race, and that thought process and linkage is BY FAR the most prevalent remaining example of racism in this country, IMO.

.
Click to expand...

it's your party that likes to label people racists if they are againt welfare and affirmitive action.
 
#88
#88
lawgator1 said:
Obama -- I believe in context he was speaking as to typical reaction to racial issue by white persons, right? I think in context it was not derisive of inherent attribute of a race.t.
Click to expand...

implying that comment by obama wasn't the equivalent of saying all white people are racists is absurd.
 
#89
#89
droski said:
it's your party that likes to label people racists if they are againt welfare and affirmitive action.
Click to expand...


Only when the person who is against those programs is against them because they believe some combination of a) minorities are by and large lazy and taking advantage of the rest of us taxpayers; b) minorities utilize these programs disproportiantely to their actual need; c) minorities overutilize these programs because their family structures are lacking and because they do not plan their families well; d) all of the above.

Based on his lengthy and documented history of comments on the subject, I think RL is definitely in the (d) category.
 
#90
#90
lawgator1 said:
Only when the person who is against those programs is against them because they believe some combination of a) minorities are by and large lazy and taking advantage of the rest of us taxpayers; b) minorities utilize these programs disproportiantely to their actual need; c) minorities overutilize these programs because their family structures are lacking and because they do not plan their families well; d) all of the above.

Based on his lengthy and documented history of comments on the subject, I think RL is definitely in the (d) category.
Click to expand...

do you really think that limbaugh woudl be in favor of these programs if they disproportionately favored white people?
 
#91
#91
lawgator1 said:
Assuming you are correct and that others have made racist statements, and even of one credits them for having a record as consistent as RL on the subject, how would that be supportive of RL's application?
Click to expand...

I'm referring to your adamant stance based on some comments you never heard him make that he is in fact a racist.

At the same time, you find excuses for others.

The Rams issue is irrelevant - it's about your disliking someone so much that you believe worse things about that person. The grand irony is that you make your point by using the exact same tactics you claim to loathe about the target in the first place.
 
#92
#92
lawgator1 said:
Only when the person who is against those programs is against them because they believe some combination of a) minorities are by and large lazy and taking advantage of the rest of us taxpayers; b) minorities utilize these programs disproportiantely to their actual need; c) minorities overutilize these programs because their family structures are lacking and because they do not plan their families well; d) all of the above.

Based on his lengthy and documented history of comments on the subject, I think RL is definitely in the (d) category.
Click to expand...

Explain how b and c aren't exactly true?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#95
#95
BigPapaVol said:
Explain how b and c aren't exactly true?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...


Do you think that b and c are true because of some inherent and immutable trait in the minority population? Or because something socio-economic, such as a long history of economic distress (relative, that is, to their white counterparts?) In other words, if b and c are true, is it true because of race, or is race a proxy for it?
 
#96
#96
lawgator1 said:
Do you think that b and c are true because of some inherent and immutable trait in the minority population? Or because something socio-economic, such as a long history of economic distress (relative, that is, to their white counterparts?) In other words, if b and c are true, is it true because of race, or is race a proxy for it?
Click to expand...

I assume you think you know the answer. What I know is that introduction of mandated welfare exacerbated the problem, on a massive scale. It's not limited to race. The stats suggest that your proxy argument might be true, but it's one sorry ass excuse.

Where my folks were from, everyone was broke. There is no relative level of broke. Some found a way, some didn't.

It's not genetic, but it is generational and getting worse.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#98
#98
lawgator1 said:
Do you think that b and c are true because of some inherent and immutable trait in the minority population? Or because something socio-economic, such as a long history of economic distress (relative, that is, to their white counterparts?) In other words, if b and c are true, is it true because of race, or is race a proxy for it?
Click to expand...

and somehow you just know that limbaugh thinks it's because of race right?
 
#99
#99
justingroves said:
Walter Payton played for the Bears.

Barry Sanders played for the Lions.

Jim Brown played for Cleveland.
Click to expand...
He must have meant Gale...oh, he was a Bear too. I don't know who he can mean. Dickerson? Hmmm.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#100
#100
BigPapaVol said:
I assume you think you know the answer. What I know is that introduction of mandated welfare exacerbated the problem, on a massive scale. It's not limited to race. The stats suggest that your proxy argument might be true, but it's one sorry ass excuse.

Where my folks were from, everyone was broke. There is no relative level of broke. Some found a way, some didn't.

It's not genetic, but it is generational and getting worse.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

and liberals and obama telling minorities they can't get out of poverty because of america's deep seeded racism isn't helping anything.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top