Lunardi just said

#76
#76
docholiday said:
Name all those future pros.
Florida has one player in the top 60 mock drafts and
he is Young at #59 and #60 in two major mocks.
Click to expand...

They have already answered. But Hill and Walker. They would both start for us and be some of our best players.
 
#78
#78
k-town_king said:
They have already answered. But Hill and Walker. They would both start for us and be some of our best players.
Click to expand...

So, you do not follow hoops closely? Hill will not play in the NBA and Walker is questionable. You better watch more NBA also and think on your own.
 
#80
#80
SJAVol32 said:
I bolded what I was talking about Stokes >>>>>>>>>> Patricia
Click to expand...

Stokes a lot better than Young? They are close in terms of talent. I would take Stokes.

Stoke needs to come back and continue to develop the 15 foot jumper. Stokes or Mcrae will not be playing in the NBA
next year.
 
#82
#82
docholiday said:
He is projected as a first or second rounder in 2015.
Being drafted does not mean your playing in the league.
He will have to develop next year and may not.
Click to expand...

He's the projected 10th pick in 2015 draft by the best mock draft site out there.

How many projected top 10 picks do we have? top 15? Top 20? 1st round?
 
#84
#84
JMSqb11 said:
And for a third year staff with a system in its third year with the most talent this staff has had in its three seasons vs a team this staff has owned coming into this year, a "moral victory" playing the number one team close isn't a plus for us. I don't see how this excuse is being used so often all of the sudden.
Click to expand...

No one used the term 'moral victory' except you. Expressions of admiration for a game (mostly) well played are merely that...and certainly not an 'excuse' for anything.

You shouldn't invent things in order to gin up your peculiar POV.
 
#85
#85
bleedingTNorange said:
He's the projected 10th pick in 2015 draft by the best mock draft site out there.

How many projected top 10 picks do we have? top 15? Top 20? 1st round?
Click to expand...


Another top draft board has him at 42. He has not played a full season. He is not a guarantee NBA prospect. He is their best NBA potential prospect.
Donovan

The poster said that Florida was loaded full of NBA players. Not the case.
 
#87
#87
docholiday said:
Another top draft board has him at 42. He has not played a full season. He is not a guarantee NBA prospect. He is their best NBA potential prospect.
Donovan

The poster said that Florida was loaded full of NBA players. Not the case.
Click to expand...

I said they have future pros on the bench. They do. Hill and Walker will both be drafted by the NBA. If SW wasn't there and Hill started he would be much higher in the mocks. They had him top ten next year before the season. My point is still valid. They have future pros that would start and star for us on the bench.
 
#88
#88
docholiday said:
Another top draft board has him at 42. He has not played a full season. He is not a guarantee NBA prospect. He is their best NBA potential prospect.
Donovan

The poster said that Florida was loaded full of NBA players. Not the case.
Click to expand...

They've got more guys on mock boards then we do, that's for damn sure
 
#89
#89
therealitytheory said:
No one used the term 'moral victory' except you. Expressions of admiration for a game (mostly) well played are merely that...and certainly not an 'excuse' for anything.

You shouldn't invent things in order to gin up your peculiar POV.
Click to expand...

Once again like I said, go back to the game thread and every one was touting our game as a moral victory. Even Freak said that he wasn't in the mood for moral victories and people fought him on it
 
#90
#90
JMSqb11 said:
Why? We lost because of ourselves. Not because of Florida. It's crazy that if we make the tourney, we haven't been in the top 25 in three seasons and this year is weakest of the three seasons' résumés. One thing that baffles me is how a 12 loss SEC team can be safely in when given the state of the conference. If we got passed over the last two years with better résumés, I wouldn't be shocked if we see we are safe and we wind up not getting in.
Click to expand...

SHUT UP!!! Kentucky, with all their talent, are fighting right now to try to beat the team YOU, and several others, seem to think we should've beaten by 30. Did anybody in the SEC beat UF by 30? Did anyone else in the SEC BEAT UF?
 
#91
#91
HBCButch said:
SHUT UP!!! Kentucky, with all their talent, are fighting right now to try to beat the team YOU, and several others, seem to think we should've beaten by 30. Did anybody in the SEC beat UF by 30? Did anyone else in the SEC BEAT UF?
Click to expand...

Can't compare us to UK as we actually have players that are in a system longer than a year. Plus, Cal>Cuonzo. Our players have played against Florida's for three years. Why all of the sudden have we gone from beating them to getting shut down by them? That's my argument.
 
#92
#92
JMSqb11 said:
It just amazes me why we are considered locks to be in the tourney this year. This is our worst résumé in Martin's three years and this of all years we are considered in. really fathoms me
Click to expand...

You're trying too hard.

You'll get more responses to your thread if you pace yourself.

Otherwise, 'really fathoms me' shows a lot of potential. heh
 
#94
#94
bleedingTNorange said:
I could be wrong on this assumption, but it's been my understanding...they no longer look at how you're playing lately to determine who's in and out. However it has seemed that the eye test has been used with seeding. For example, I could see a team like Iowa who's really stumbled late, bumped down to a play in game.

Just a thought
Click to expand...

Prophet? :thumbsup:
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top