DeerPark12
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- Messages
- 7,270
- Likes
- 11,808
I completely understand that. Elite travel ball is much more competitive than high school ball. It's more competitive than some levels of college ball. You often see mind boggling high school stats that don't translate to college at all.So being dominant in high school does not mean you will be great (or even good enough to play) in college.
On the other hand, you WOULD expect a player to be dominant against high school players if they are going to be elite college players.
Would you agree it's fair to say if you don't dominate high school players you aren't likely to dominate college players?
Yes and no. There are a lot of variables when you put elite players in a high school setting. As you probably know from your experience, elite players are working on Softball five or six days a week during their competitive season. A high school player will likely only practice or play three or four times a week.
There are also The variables of how good the high school team is around them, what the officiating is like, what a high school coaches philosophy is, how competent a high school coach is in identifying and correcting minor issues with pitching motion or hitter stance, things like that.
You would expect that a player that will be great in college would be dominant in high school. But I have seen the opposite happen, and there's not a great explanation for it. A pitcher that went to play for a good friend of mine at another D1 school had an ERA of over 5 in her high school season, then it was under 2 beginning a month later in travel ball season.
In her case, her high school coach, those successful overall, did not know how to evaluate her motion and correct her on the fly. Working with her travel ball coach for two weeks straightened out a hitch in her motion that fixed her problems right away.