Those three teams would have won the national title playing the Princeton offense and John Chaney's zone. They were simply better than anyone else. In the cases of Vegas and Kentucky, much, much better.But it worked against the best teams in '91, '94, and '96, right? Were there not any decent guards those years?
But it worked against the best teams in '91, '94, and '96, right? Were there not any decent guards those years?
Please tell me who in the country had better backcourts than those three teams in the years they won.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Those three teams would have won the national title playing the Princeton offense and John Chaney's zone. They were simply better than anyone else. In the cases of Vegas and Kentucky, much, much better.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Name the great point guards those teams beat. A flu ridden freshman Bobby Hurley? Jeff Capel? Lazarus Sims? Kenny Anderson and Jalen Rose were the best they faced. Georgia Tech scored so easily for 30 minutes against Vegas that Tark called off the press and Arkansas didn't press full time in the regional final against the Wolverines. Kentucky didn't press full time against anyone in '96, so their inclusion is this discussion is senseless.That isn't the question. The statement was that the press couldn't beat a team with great guard play. Thus, the guard play of the presser, not the press-ee, is at issue.
I will wait for you to go on record that the pressing teams did not play against great guards en route to their championship before name dropping.
Further, if Kentucky had attempted to press UMASS in the Final Four as much as they did in that year's opener, they'd have been going home two nights early.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
It wasn't emploted in those years in truly meaningful ways. Every one of those coaches backed away from his hardcore pressing tendencies and kicked everyone's teeth out in the half court. Go look.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
There's a huge difference between a team that can press and uses it as a weapon and one that has to turn people over with its press to win. The teams you've listed are the former. The teams of Bruce Pearl and his patron saint Tom Davis are the latter.I agree. But that is beside the point. The question at bar is whether a pressing team can win a national championship. Several posters appear to have flatly concluded that, no, they cannot. So regardless of whether they needed to press...they did press, and they did win.
If he could have pressed them, why didn't he?I disagree. No way Pitino was losing to Calipari a second time that year. Especially after Cal came out and popped off about how he out-clevered Pitino by making him prepare (from statements made to the media) for box-and-one and triangle-and-two defenses that he had no intention of running.
How I remember such minutiae, I have no idea.
Name the great point guards those teams beat. A flu ridden freshman Bobby Hurley? Jeff Capel? Lazarus Sims? Kenny Anderson and Jalen Rose were the best they faced. Georgia Tech scored so easily for 30 minutes against Vegas that Tark called off the press and Arkansas didn't press full time in the regional final against the Wolverines. Kentucky didn't press full time against anyone in '96, so their inclusion is this discussion is senseless.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Why wouldn't they have pressed a team with awful guards? LSU was crap. How much did they press Padilla and Traveiso in the Final Four? Not much, since they got sliced to bits doing it in the opener. I'm assuming you missed the part about Tech shooting about 60% until Tark called the press off and strangled them in the halfcourt. Arizona's inability to guard Corliss Williamson and the fact that Reaves and Stoudamire couldn't throw it in the ocean that afternoon in Charlotte had a whole lot more to do with Arkansas winning than the press did.Kenny Anderson was a damn good college player. Damon Stoudamire and Khalid Reaves were a very solid backcourt. Hurley was very good. (I didn't know he had the flu, but flu or no flu, Duke got the living shiznit kicked out of them in that game). That isn't a bad start off the top of my head.
The statement about Kentucky in '96 I just don't know if I can go along with. They were certainly pressing LSU in the regular season when they beat them by approximately 96. They were pressing every possession. Did they stop at some point along the way?
Wait a minute. Your knowledge of what those teams did or didn't do comes from Youtube?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Why wouldn't they have pressed a team with awful guards? LSU was crap. How much did they press Padilla and Traveiso in the Final Four? Not much, since they got sliced to bits doing it in the opener. I'm assuming you missed the part about Tech shooting about 60% until Tark called the press off and strangled them in the halfcourt. Arizona's inability to guard Corliss Williamson and the fact that Reaves and Stoudamire couldn't throw it in the ocean that afternoon in Charlotte had a whole lot more to do with Arkansas winning than the press did.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Is that why Denny Crum spent every summer at clinics throughout the country teaching the virtues of the 2-2-1 press?I'm not 19 years old. I saw all those teams play, and I do have a memory. And when my memory thinks of those teams, it sees a press. But by no means is my memory perfect.
Also, it should be noted that your memory is not perfect -- alluding back to your statement that the late 70's and early 80's Crum teams pressed their opponents into the ground. My dad, a diehard UofL fan who went to all those home games and watched the rest on tv, confirmed that UofL pressed just occassionally.
If he could have pressed them, why didn't he?
Posted via VolNation Mobile