Manafort Trial Thread Part II

#326
#326
volinbham said:
Wouldn't it be interesting if among the Craig, Skadden, Podesta folks some info emerged about donations to a certain foundation...

A person can dream can't they?
Click to expand...

Dream on, there are just some people that are untouchable. Nothing will come out of these referrals.
 
#328
#328
Stew Cook said:
I dunno, there's a lot of bad name choices that came out of the 1960-70s. Probably worse these days though.
Click to expand...

I actually know a guy who named his kid Dillan. No problem if you’re anyone other that this family who’s last name is Kards
 
#329
#329
TennTom said:
In order to be a felony, one must be charged and convicted of it. But continue to ignore REALITY.
Click to expand...
Wait a minute... You only committed as crime if you got charged and convicted? That's one of the most asinine things I've read on here in a while.
 
#332
#332
I can see him slicing razor thin garlic now.



CoKaXGhWgAEogCa.jpg
 
#334
#334
Well, Ben Shapiro is screwed. Looks like he broke several laws while helping Manafort when he was at Breitbart.
 
#338
#338
TennTom said:
.
Click to expand...

I’ve seen the things you’ve posted on here , we all point and laugh at the things you say . I’ve watched Ben on his college tours and listened to him on the radio , you first need credibility before you question someone else don’t you think ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#339
#339
TennTom said:
.
Click to expand...

Are you serious? You refuse any information from most sources given by others, merely based on the fact that you hate the sources, and defend the new book about Trump's White House merely because of who wrote it, despite the fact that the people he wrote about deny it.

Truly amazing and self incriminating.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#340
#340
0nelilreb said:
I’ve seen the things you’ve posted on here , we all point and laugh at the things you say . I’ve watched Ben on his college tours and listened to him on the radio , you first need credibility before you question someone else don’t you think ?
Click to expand...
You routinely get punched in the mouth here. Are you really this delusional? I'm thinking yes.
 
#341
#341
Lol. Anybody care to bet if Shapiro actually sees legal issues or not from this? Short of defamation what exactly can you prosecute a journalist for in publishing an article? You can’t even prosecute them for publishing classified info. That’s on the person that gave it to them. 😂😂
 
#342
#342
Orange_Crush said:
Are you serious? You refuse any information from most sources given by others, merely based on the fact that you hate the sources, and defend the new book about Trump's White House merely because of who wrote it, despite the fact that the people he wrote about deny it.

Truly amazing and self incriminating.
Click to expand...
He is one of the most esteemed journalists in the world with 13 best selling NON-FICTION books and Pulitzer Prizes to his credit. And he's long used anonymous sources in all of them. The fact that you disregard his resume to believe the corrupt grifters and lying cronies in the Trump circle speaks volumes.
 
#343
#343
TennTom said:
You routinely get punched in the mouth here. Are you really this delusional? I'm thinking yes.
Click to expand...

Me , how about WE ? See that’s the difference between a logical thinking person and a left wing loon . I know that if you post anything in political forums you will get punched now and then , you on the other hand routinely look down right foolish but never think you do .
 
#344
#344
0nelilreb said:
Me , how about WE ? See that’s the difference between a logical thinking person and a left wing loon . I know that if you post anything in political forums you will get punched now and then , you on the other hand routinely look down right foolish but never think you do .
Click to expand...
Sure bud, spike that ball when you're down by 4 touchdowns. LOL That's your MO. You're Tums with no spelling skills.
 
#345
#345
NorthDallas40 said:
Lol. Anybody care to bet if Shapiro actually sees legal issues or not from this? Short of defamation what exactly can you prosecute a journalist for in publishing an article? You can’t even prosecute them for publishing classified info. That’s on the person that gave it to them. 😂😂
Click to expand...

One of the laws broken, to begin with, was FARA. And let's not forget what the implications of pushing pro-Kremlin op eds for cash are. And yes. Shapiro is identified by the Special Counsel filings as "Person D". Looks like he's an
an unindicted co-conspirator in "Conspiracy against the United States"
DnHCDaSU4AINHxM.jpg
 
#346
#346
carlos86 said:
One of the laws broken, to begin with, was FARA. And let's not forget what the implications of pushing pro-Kremlin op eds for cash are. And yes. Shapiro is identified by the Special Counsel filings as "Person D". Looks like he's an
an unindicted co-conspirator in "Conspiracy against the United States"
DnHCDaSU4AINHxM.jpg
Click to expand...
Cmon Carlos bet me. I need beer money. No freaking way a journalist gets prosecuted for writing a story.
 
#347
#347
TennTom said:
He is one of the most esteemed journalists in the world with 13 best selling NON-FICTION books and Pulitzer Prizes to his credit. And he's long used anonymous sources in all of them. The fact that you disregard his resume to believe the corrupt grifters and lying cronies in the Trump circle speaks volumes.
Click to expand...

What speaks volumes is the fact that you either can't read, or can't process information as given. I never said one way or the other. I merely pointed out the fact that you are what you accused of being. It's appropriate that you are showing a lack of cognitive function after the post you made, and I responded to.

(For the record, you doubled down on your own idiocy and your cognitive function was apparently defunct enough to not realize it. You doubled down on accepting one narrative based solelty on who wrote it, and denying its opposite narrative based solely on who said it. lol In case your cognitive function has completely vacated. I'll help by reminding you of the post I responded to.

Links are not quotes, dimwit. I noticed you refuted nothing in the article. Typical of someone without cognitive function. Just whine about the source like a child.
Click to expand...
 
#348
#348
NorthDallas40 said:
Lol. Anybody care to bet if Shapiro actually sees legal issues or not from this? Short of defamation what exactly can you prosecute a journalist for in publishing an article? You can’t even prosecute them for publishing classified info. That’s on the person that gave it to them. 😂😂
Click to expand...
These are the same folks that call President Donald Trump a fascist for saying mean things about the press. Now they want to see a journalist in legal trouble for writing articles. You really can't even make this stuff up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#349
#349
Orange_Crush said:
These are the same folks that call President Donald Trump a fascist for saying mean things about the press. Now they want to see a journalist in legal trouble for writing articles. You really can't even make this stuff up.
Click to expand...

They really should be spending their time getting their talking points straight in defense of Craig, Podesta, and McCabe as a minimum. 😈
 
#350
#350
NorthDallas40 said:
Cmon Carlos bet me. I need beer money. No freaking way a journalist gets prosecuted for writing a story.
Click to expand...

1) Ben Shapiro isn't a journalist he's an opinion writer who goes around colleges getting people to debate him.
2) He accepted dirty foreign money to push pro-Russian propaganda. Now the question is why he was regurgitating straight-up Kremlin propaganda attacking Ukraine for cash????
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top