Marxist Black Lives Matter

[37L1]

Detroit police release video of man firing at cops before officers fatally shoot him

And. . . .

They protested this one too.

Black Lives Matter but Facts Often Don't.

 

[Smokey'sHandler]

Detroit police release video of man firing at cops before officers fatally shoot him

And. . . .

They protested this one too.

Black Lives Matter but Facts Often Don't.

To quote Don Lemon: Black Lives Matter isn't for all black lives. It was started and intended to be for black lives that were subject to police brutality. If you want a group for black on black crime create your own group for Black on Black Crime Lives.

In most of those cases facts don't matter, the black man even if he is openly willing to kill someone is the victim and a martyr.

All the more reason for body cameras to be used especially if you are a cop in a Democratic run city. I haven't heard too much about this one but I would be highly surprised if the officers didn't lose their jobs over this and hopefully they will be on the path towards vindication if so.

 

[Zues1]

Detroit police release video of man firing at cops before officers fatally shoot him

And. . . .

They protested this one too.

Black Lives Matter but Facts Often Don't.

If we just defunded the police all the violence would magically go away.

 

[Smokey'sHandler]

For the Black Lives Matter supporters/empathizers: One of the main Black Lives Matter's goals is to disrupt the nuclear family structure. With one of the main issues plaguing the black communities being single mother homes how is this part of their mission going to progress the black community?

To me wouldn't it be better to pursue more of a nuclear family structure so there are less fragmented black homes?

A lot of their goals seem ultimately aimed at further hurting the black community than helping it.

 

[k-town_king]

"You guys"? I mean, it seems to me, you are grouping a bunch of people together without any idea what they truly think. And honestly, a lot of what you post is meant to incite and provoke malicious response, not actual intellectual conversation.

But no response to the "That's what they do" which was actually what you are falsely accusing me of.

Not surprising

 

[k-town_king]

For the Black Lives Matter supporters/empathizers: One of the main Black Lives Matter's goals is to disrupt the nuclear family structure. With one of the main issues plaguing the black communities being single mother homes how is this part of their mission going to progress the black community?

To me wouldn't it be better to pursue more of a nuclear family structure so there are less fragmented black homes?

A lot of their goals seem ultimately aimed at further hurting the black community than helping it.

Not true..

If you don't agree cool. No need to lie and make crap up

 

[Weezer]

But no response to the "That's what they do" which was actually what you are falsely accusing me of.

Not surprising

Not sure what you're talking about. I was attempting a conversation with you. And I made no accusations, only observations.

 

[Smokey'sHandler]

Not true..

If you don't agree cool. No need to lie and make crap up

Have you read the Black Lives Matter webpage?

They literally say they disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages”.

Is this not what is attempted in fatherless black homes? They are attempted to be raised/influenced by extended families and villages. Do you think this model has led to more success or chaos in the black community?

 

[k-town_king]

Not sure what you're talking about. I was attempting a conversation with you. And I made no accusations, only observations.

My point is why have you not asked the same of other posters making similar statements? Go question those who are actually doing what you are accusing me of.

I was obviously talking about specific regular posters in the PF here on VN. I know clearly what those I am speaking of think as they have stated their ignorant views many times.

 

[k-town_king]

Have you read the Black Lives Matter webpage?

They literally say they disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages”.

Is this not what is attempted in fatherless black homes? They are attempted to be raised/influenced by extended families and villages. Do you think this model has led to more success or chaos in the black community?

"
We make our spaces family-friendly and enable parents to fully participate with their children. We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work “double shifts” so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work.
We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable."

You are trying to twist words to fit you agenda. No where do they advocate for one parent homes.

There is a old saying about taking a village to raise a child. That means people around in the community in addition to the the parents. That is obvious though and anyone twisting it to mean something else has an agenda or is just having reading comprehension problems.

 

[BigOrangeTrain]

Not true..

If you don't agree cool. No need to lie and make crap up

Educate yourself and stop lying. From the article:

“We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.”

https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/

 

[Weezer]

My point is why have you not asked the same of other posters making similar statements? Go question those who are actually doing what you are accusing me of.

I was obviously talking about specific regular posters in the PF here on VN. I know clearly what those I am speaking of think as they have stated their ignorant views many times.

I have called out certain comments in the past. Now I'm talking to you. Only you don't seem to want conversation so much as you want to verbally chastise someone. And again, I accused you of nothing. Your posts speak for themselves.

 

[Weezer]

For the Black Lives Matter supporters/empathizers: One of the main Black Lives Matter's goals is to disrupt the nuclear family structure. With one of the main issues plaguing the black communities being single mother homes how is this part of their mission going to progress the black community?

To me wouldn't it be better to pursue more of a nuclear family structure so there are less fragmented black homes?

A lot of their goals seem ultimately aimed at further hurting the black community than helping it.

To be fair, you cannot make men of any color be fathers if they choose not to. That doesn't stop a community from working together to help single mothers. Family is more than blood. Family consists of those who love and support you. I don't think that statement is about attacking the typical family so much as it's saying you shouldn't be ashamed of having an atypical family.

 

[TheDeeble]

To be fair, you cannot make men of any color be fathers if they choose not to. That doesn't stop a community from working together to help single mothers. Family is more than blood. Family consists of those who love and support you. I don't think that statement is about attacking the typical family so much as it's saying you shouldn't be ashamed of having an atypical family.

I don't think it's saying you shouldn't be ashamed of an atypical family. It's a statement that a nuclear family isn't needed.

We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other.....

Translates to what we're doing now proves a nuclear family isn't needed. You say a nuclear family is needed. Our practice proves you're wrong. We're disrupting your belief.

Whether or not you believe that's accurate, that's really up to an individual. I'm always going to believe a two parent household is most ideal for a child. But that's what their statement means by "we disrupt". Our practice of support is as good or better than a two parent nuclear family.

 

[Bigun]

"
We make our spaces family-friendly and enable parents to fully participate with their children. We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work “double shifts” so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work.
We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable."

You are trying to twist words to fit you agenda. No where do they advocate for one parent homes.

There is a old saying about taking a village to raise a child. That means people around in the community in addition to the the parents. That is obvious though and anyone twisting it to mean something else has an agenda or is just having reading comprehension problems.

Lol at family friendly. They also call white people sub-human. They are a terrorist organization, and should be treated as such.

 

[Bigun]

more racism.....

 

[Bigun]

"
We make our spaces family-friendly and enable parents to fully participate with their children. We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work “double shifts” so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work.
We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable."

You are trying to twist words to fit you agenda. No where do they advocate for one parent homes.

There is a old saying about taking a village to raise a child. That means people around in the community in addition to the the parents. That is obvious though and anyone twisting it to mean something else has an agenda or is just having reading comprehension problems.

 

[0nelilreb]

That’s a first gen prototype for the Predator. Then they decided to amp up the genetics to give it some boss abilities to hunt with .

 

[allvol123]

I'd love to hear it. Have you noticed how fact based, well spoken and even keeled people with conservative values are on television and social media?

Yes. There is really a need for more positive role models for young black males. He is an ace for that category. Unfortunately, Lebron and his ilk are the cool kids on the block.

 

[Zues1]

She's calling other races sub human, oh that's rich. Apperantly some people are like vampires, no mirrors in their home to look into.

 

[DynaLo]

Well this certainly seems appropriate in the current environment.

 

[BreatheUT]

"
We make our spaces family-friendly and enable parents to fully participate with their children. We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work “double shifts” so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work.
We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable."

You are trying to twist words to fit you agenda. No where do they advocate for one parent homes.

There is a old saying about taking a village to raise a child. That means people around in the community in addition to the the parents. That is obvious though and anyone twisting it to mean something else has an agenda or is just having reading comprehension problems.

Am I missing something here or is there no mention of father?

Explain how two can see the same thing and interpret it differently.

 

[xXRockyTopXx]

Who is they? Criminals? 70% of crime is from white people. I can post a million stories of white people committing assaults too. Neither prove anything.


No, I never said that or implied that. The majority of the conservatives that post in the PF on VolNation are.

You guys are pretty much fringe lunatics for the most part . I don't think the conservatives here represent a typical white American.

A typical white American could give 3 ***** what someone's skin color is and would be right there next to anyone if they were the target of racism. I know that's not a popular take right now but it's the truth. Society today isn't the society of 50-60+ years ago and holding us accountable or acting as though we had something to do with it is getting old.

 

[StarRaider]

A typical white American could give 3 ***** what someone's skin color is and would be right there next to anyone if they were the target of racism. I know that's not a popular take right now but it's the truth. Society today isn't the society of 50-60+ years ago and holding us accountable or acting as though we had something to do with it is getting old.

Thank you, pretty much nailed it.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Educate yourself and stop lying. From the article:

“We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.”

https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/

I looked at their web page until I got to Trayvon Martin.