I really don't think it was that big of a deal. It MIGHT have been worth a foul call, MAYBE, but it wasn't worth getting ejected. I agree on the replay it looked like it might have been intentional, but happening in real time, ehhh. I could easily see where Goins was trying to protect himself, or just found himself in a bad position. Like I said, I would have been ok with a foul call, but I think ejecting him was over the top. If he wanted to hurt him, he could have easily just socked him one, or went a little lower. It was around his navel area.
What really disgusted me is that when it happened (and the refs HAD to see it, it was so obvious, he was out near half court all alone) they called nothing. They let play continue, and didn't stop play until something happened on the other end of the court. That is fine, however the fact that they went back to look at the tape earlier than what they stopped play for (I think officially it was a foul on Patterson). I mean WTF? And then they supposedly did double T's? But I think they got reversed? what? I don't even know if Patterson's original foul counted. I dunno, the whole incident was pretty bad IMO.
I really didn't think that it was that much worse than the kind of physical stuff you go through cutting through the baseline. The difference was Cousins (whether it hurt or not, which he was up almost immediately and on defense) had a pretty strong reaction to it. And they had been babying him and letting him get away with slaugther all game long. Oh and when they called a T on Chism for standing there, his facial expression didn't even change. LOL. That was ridiculous as well.
Like I said I would have been ok with a foul. But I think ejecting him was over the top. True it didn't make a different in the outcome, but that still doesn't make it right imo.