....Go on....
It took me 20 seconds to type that. Remember when you went back and edited your post? It was right after this one. By the way, all I forgot was an "s". I'm saying they can't spell and don't use apostrophes or commas. The best you could do was calling me out on forum abbreviations. Congratulations, you'd fit right in at Memphis and Miami.
It's funny you think the Big East is getting better. Is that why the crumbling Big 12 didn't want Boise State or Houston? Or how about the ACC passing on UCF?
You're right... the Big East totally got better. Especially with the addition of Memphis. :wacko:
???
A conference that was a BCS qualifier, loses:
West Virginia
Syracuse
Pitt
and adds:
Boise State
Houston
UCF
and is stripped of it's BCS AQ bid? Does not compute, although the league may get watered down a bit, these three teams are an updrade over the 3 leaving.
Whether the BE deserved an AQ spot prior to the realignment is another can of worms, but using the teams going vs. teams coming in as an argument for losing AQ doesn't hold water.
Is the Big East going to start playing a football championship game? Memphis makes 12, right?
In terms of the current quality of the teams coming and going, I agree with you. But, I think a big reason the Big East held on to its BCS bid as long as it did was that losing it would have cut out a lot of big TV markets in the Northeast. WVU's not a big market, but they are a "brand." Who's the biggest brand left that otherwise disinterested football fans will watch? I guess it's Boise. The Big East is probably more likely to be judged by the BCS solely on the merits of its football programs now.