Mendenhall Osama Quotes

#51
#51
Mendenhall's clarification is just as off base as his original comments. The world watched in horror as thousands of innocent men, women, and children were murdered on 9/11. The world celebrated when the ******* who orchestrated it got what he deserved. Mendenhall can go play camel jockey for all I care.
 
#53
#53
nbakerld said:
You can say terrorist. You can say whatever you want. That's what I call them.

So how are you going to wipe them off the face of the earth? How are you going to find them all? You are going to wipe all terrorist-sympathizers off the face of the earth? I can't imagine a better way to encourage them to perform suicide bombings.

A 9/11 type event was very rare before the war on terror. Just because we haven't had an event like it in the last 10 years doesn't mean the war on terror is a deterrent.
Click to expand...
You are aware that an attack on the World Trade Centers occurred previously with explosives in the underground parking garages, right?
 
#54
#54
nbakerld said:
I don't care if you agree with me. Thanks for the 3 un-constructive, dismissive comments you brought to this thread. You really made people think today.
Click to expand...

He's responsible for his short quips, but you are responsible for provoking him with your idiocy.
 
#56
#56
nbakerld said:
Wow. You get emotional past the point of reason. How have I made any excuse for them? This is about practicality, not some sort of blame game. I do not want to be attacked again. That is all.
Click to expand...

We know you don't wanna be attacked again. Maybe those mean U.S. Soldiers will quit attacking your people.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#58
#58
hmanvolfan said:
You are aware that an attack on the World Trade Centers occurred previously with explosives in the underground parking garages, right?
Click to expand...

Yes, once. And it was like 10 or so years before 9/11 wasn't it? They are very rare. So just because we haven't had one in the last 9.5 years doesn't really mean anything.
 
#59
#59
nbakerld said:
If supporting the reinstatement of Israel, and the Iran Contra, and training the Taliban, etc. are the reason for unjust retaliations against US civilians would you change our actions?
Click to expand...

We supported the "Iran Contra"? I guess it was better than supporting the "Iraq Sandinistas"...

You obviously have no clue what you are talking about. The entertainment value is off the charts, though.
 
#62
#62
therealUT said:
We supported the "Iran Contra"? I guess it was better than supporting the "Iraq Sandinistas"...

You obviously have no clue what you are talking about. The entertainment value is off the charts, though.
Click to expand...

Sorry, can't really support the "Iran Contra". What I meant was we supported the coup in Iran which led to a major power change that a lot of Iranians didn't like. We made enemies in the process, and the hostage situation associated with the Iran Contra was retaliation.

"Iraq Sandinistas"? I don't think you know what you are talking about. And neutrality is always an option. Just a thought.

Post-coup

Following the coup, the United States helped build up the Shah's regime. In the first three weeks, the American government gave Iran $68 million in emergency aid, and an additional $1.2 billion over the next decade.[19]

During his reign, the Shah received significant American support, frequently making state visits to the White House and earning praise from numerous American presidents. The Shah's close ties to Washington and his Westernization policies soon angered some Iranians, especially the hardline Islamic conservatives.

In America, the coup was originally considered a triumph of covert action but is now considered by many to have left "a haunting and terrible legacy."[20] In 2000, U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, called it a "setback for democratic government" in Iran.[21] Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei condemned the admission as "deceitful", complaining that it "did not even include an apology"
Click to expand...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_–_United_States_relations
 
Last edited:
#67
#67
nbakerld said:
I don't know what I'm talking about because your joke doesn't make sense?
Click to expand...

It makes plenty of sense to me; it probably makes plenty of sense to others who are reading this thread. It went over your head. Sucks for you, man.
 
#71
#71
nbakerld said:
fyp
Click to expand...

If you don't get it, you are not qualified to call it lame. If someone who gets the joke wants to call it lame, that person would merit such a privilege.

Lame jokes look like this:

Why do elephants have trunks? Because they would look silly holding suitcases.

People get it; however, to most persons above the age of seven, that joke is not exactly hilarious. Therefore, it is lame.

Ich bin eine Berliner. People that don't speak German and, therefore, do not understand why that statement was funny, would not laugh; however, the failure to incite laughter from persons ignorant of German language does not necessarily imply "lameness".
 
#72
#72
therealUT said:
If you don't get it, you are not qualified to call it lame. If someone who gets the joke wants to call it lame, that person would merit such a privilege.

Lame jokes look like this:

Why do elephants have trunks? Because they would look silly holding suitcases.

People get it; however, to most persons above the age of seven, that joke is not exactly hilarious. Therefore, it is lame.

Ich bin eine Berliner. People that don't speak German and, therefore, do not understand why that statement was funny, would not laugh; however, the failure to incite laughter from persons ignorant of German language does not necessarily imply "lameness".
Click to expand...

This took you a lot longer than explaining your joke would take.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top