myrobbins7
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2007
- Messages
- 23,047
- Likes
- 279
So please tell me how Charleston beating one SEC team that isn't even the overall leader in the conference is in any way comparable to MSU beating the conference leader and two other teams from the conference that will be in the NCAAs.
I'm not sure you understand sentences.
That is the whole point: aberrations and context are relevant, simple Ws are not.
Kansas would wipe the floor with MSU today; texas and ok. state are turnstile teams.
They seem to actually be playing worse D since the gonzaga-time-frame, albeit a bit better O.
I'd really like to say they've improved, but watching each game has not shown that to be the case. We're essentially--where it matters--the same junk squad we were in december. I mean you lose by 16 to the zags one month, and by 18 to NW another month, i dunno, that says about exactly what I've been seeing right there.
Here's to hoping Crean can turn things around next year, cause this year was consistently pitiful.
1) It must take some balls for someone of your mental acuity to call someone else out for an inability to comprehend. For that sir, I commend you.
2) If simple Ws are not, then what's the point in even attempting to measure quality wins?
3) How would you put it? That is merely conjecture. I could just as easily say "MSU would still beat Kansas." Neither one of us can prove it until they play.