Millions of Illegal Aliens From All Over The World Head For U.S. Border

[Orangeburst]

That is effed up. No license then no insurance. These progressives are ****ing out of their minds.

 

[Orange_Vol1321]

That is effed up. No license then no insurance. These progressives are ****ing out of their minds.

I'm sure the murder part was sarcasm but why should anybody go get a license?

 

[Orange_Vol1321]

 

[Orange_Vol1321]

 

[Orange_Vol1321]

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Greyhound to stop allowing Border Patrol agents to conduct immigration checks on buses without warrant

Greyhound said Friday it would prohibit U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents without a warrant from boarding its buses to conduct immigration checks as bus companies continue to face pressure from civil rights advocates over the practice.

The announcement comes after an Associated Press report said a Jan. 28 Border Patrol memo contradicted Greyhound's stance that it had to allow the agents on its buses under federal law.

https://eb2.3lift.com/pass?tl_click...333271&sid=15078&caid=4906235&unid=0&cb=48131
Greyhound to stop allowing Border Patrol agents to conduct immigration checks on buses without warrant

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Police identify 'extremely dangerous' twice-deported suspect who 'executed three men' in California cemetery next to the grave of a man who had been tortured and murdered in Mexico

Authorities in California are on the hunt for an 'armed and very dangerous' previously deported man who is believed to have executed three men in a cemetery this week.

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco said at a news conference there is a felony warrant out for the arrest of Jose Luis Torres Garcia, 33, with $3 Million bail. Bianco did not say how the men were killed.
https://www.volnation.com/forum/javascript:void(0)

Police identify 'extremely dangerous' suspect wanted for 'executing three men at cemetery' | Daily Mail Online

 

[Orange_Vol1321]

Greyhound to stop allowing Border Patrol agents to conduct immigration checks on buses without warrant

Greyhound said Friday it would prohibit U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents without a warrant from boarding its buses to conduct immigration checks as bus companies continue to face pressure from civil rights advocates over the practice.

The announcement comes after an Associated Press report said a Jan. 28 Border Patrol memo contradicted Greyhound's stance that it had to allow the agents on its buses under federal law.

https://eb2.3lift.com/pass?tl_click...333271&sid=15078&caid=4906235&unid=0&cb=48131
Greyhound to stop allowing Border Patrol agents to conduct immigration checks on buses without warrant

Like a bus drivers going to stop a small swat team from boarding. Lol

 

[0nelilreb]

Like a bus drivers going to stop a small swat team from boarding. Lol

I am in no way saying they should do it , because they shouldn’t , but all it would take is for one K9 handler to have his dog sit down beside the bus and everybody on it will be checked . That whole we won’t allow it stuff is just PR crap .

 

[Rickyvol77]

I am in no way saying they should do it , because they shouldn’t , but all it would take is for one K9 handler to have his dog sit down beside the bus and everybody on it will be checked . That whole we won’t allow it stuff is just PR crap .

I’d like any liberal here to give a good reason why local law enforcement agencies shouldn’t cooperate with ICE

 

[BigOrangeD]

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Supreme Court Lifts Last Bar To Trump Immigration Rule, Over Furious Sotomayor Dissent

Justice Sonia Sotomayor handed down a ferocious dissent Friday after the Supreme Court lifted the final barrier to a Trump administration rule that withholds green cards from immigrants dependent on government services.

At issue in Friday’s case was the so-called public charge rule. Federal immigration law provides that immigrants should not receive permanent legal status if they are likely to become "a public charge." The government has traditionally defined a public charge as a person dependent on a cash assistance program. The Trump administration’s rule expands that definition to include other forms of non-cash assistance like food stamps.

The vote was five to four and tracked familiar ideological lines. The Court did not give an explanation for its decision, as is typical of such orders. In dissent, Sotomayor said the Trump administration has been bringing cases to the Supreme Court prematurely by exploiting procedural rules.

The Supreme Court blocked two nationwide injunctions from New York that barred enforcement of the new policy on Jan. 27. One final injunction, which applied in the state of Illinois, remained in effect after that decision.

The government filed an emergency stay application asking the justices to lift the Illinois injunction on Feb. 13. The Court’s Friday order means the government can enforce the rule in Illinois—which has almost 2 million immigrants—while litigation continues.

Before President Donald Trump took office, the government rarely sought emergency stays from the Supreme Court. The Bush and Obama administrations combined filed just eight stay applications with the justices. Including Friday’s case, the Trump administration has sought emergency stays on 24 occasions.

The justices have granted the government’s request 11 times, allowing Trump to enforce a tailored version of his travel sanctions and use military funds for border wall construction while litigation continues in the lower courts.

Supreme Court Lifts Last Bar To Trump Immigration Rule, Over Furious Sotomayor Dissent - Washington Free Beacon

 

[BigOrangeD]

Supreme Court Lifts Last Bar To Trump Immigration Rule, Over Furious Sotomayor Dissent

Justice Sonia Sotomayor handed down a ferocious dissent Friday after the Supreme Court lifted the final barrier to a Trump administration rule that withholds green cards from immigrants dependent on government services.

At issue in Friday’s case was the so-called public charge rule. Federal immigration law provides that immigrants should not receive permanent legal status if they are likely to become "a public charge." The government has traditionally defined a public charge as a person dependent on a cash assistance program. The Trump administration’s rule expands that definition to include other forms of non-cash assistance like food stamps.

The vote was five to four and tracked familiar ideological lines. The Court did not give an explanation for its decision, as is typical of such orders. In dissent, Sotomayor said the Trump administration has been bringing cases to the Supreme Court prematurely by exploiting procedural rules.

The Supreme Court blocked two nationwide injunctions from New York that barred enforcement of the new policy on Jan. 27. One final injunction, which applied in the state of Illinois, remained in effect after that decision.

The government filed an emergency stay application asking the justices to lift the Illinois injunction on Feb. 13. The Court’s Friday order means the government can enforce the rule in Illinois—which has almost 2 million immigrants—while litigation continues.

Before President Donald Trump took office, the government rarely sought emergency stays from the Supreme Court. The Bush and Obama administrations combined filed just eight stay applications with the justices. Including Friday’s case, the Trump administration has sought emergency stays on 24 occasions.

The justices have granted the government’s request 11 times, allowing Trump to enforce a tailored version of his travel sanctions and use military funds for border wall construction while litigation continues in the lower courts.

Supreme Court Lifts Last Bar To Trump Immigration Rule, Over Furious Sotomayor Dissent - Washington Free Beacon

Winning!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[AM64]

Supreme Court Lifts Last Bar To Trump Immigration Rule, Over Furious Sotomayor Dissent

Justice Sonia Sotomayor handed down a ferocious dissent Friday after the Supreme Court lifted the final barrier to a Trump administration rule that withholds green cards from immigrants dependent on government services.

At issue in Friday’s case was the so-called public charge rule. Federal immigration law provides that immigrants should not receive permanent legal status if they are likely to become "a public charge." The government has traditionally defined a public charge as a person dependent on a cash assistance program. The Trump administration’s rule expands that definition to include other forms of non-cash assistance like food stamps.

The vote was five to four and tracked familiar ideological lines. The Court did not give an explanation for its decision, as is typical of such orders. In dissent, Sotomayor said the Trump administration has been bringing cases to the Supreme Court prematurely by exploiting procedural rules.

The Supreme Court blocked two nationwide injunctions from New York that barred enforcement of the new policy on Jan. 27. One final injunction, which applied in the state of Illinois, remained in effect after that decision.

The government filed an emergency stay application asking the justices to lift the Illinois injunction on Feb. 13. The Court’s Friday order means the government can enforce the rule in Illinois—which has almost 2 million immigrants—while litigation continues.

Before President Donald Trump took office, the government rarely sought emergency stays from the Supreme Court. The Bush and Obama administrations combined filed just eight stay applications with the justices. Including Friday’s case, the Trump administration has sought emergency stays on 24 occasions.

The justices have granted the government’s request 11 times, allowing Trump to enforce a tailored version of his travel sanctions and use military funds for border wall construction while litigation continues in the lower courts.

Supreme Court Lifts Last Bar To Trump Immigration Rule, Over Furious Sotomayor Dissent - Washington Free Beacon

Apparently the richness of her experiences as a wise Latina woman didn't carry the day with enough of the other justices ... poor baby.

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Three Migrants from Yemen Apprehended in Human Smuggling Op off California Coast

San Diego Sector Border Patrol agents apprehended eight migrants including three men from Yemen during a failed human smuggling attempt off the California coast.

During the early morning hours of February 21, the Joint Harbor Operations Center notified Border Patrol agents about a suspicious boat approaching U.S. waters. Border Patrol agents operating surveillance equipment located the boat in the dense fog, according to information obtained from San Diego Sector Border Patrol officials.

Agents arrived in the area and found the small boat beached north of the Coronado State Beach, officials reported. As they approached, the agents observed eight people jumping out of the boat and running to avoid apprehension.

The agents pursued the migrants and apprehended five almost immediately. A search of the immediate area led to the apprehension of the other three, the statement reports.

Agents conducted immigration interviews and identified three of the men as Yemeni nationals. The other five came to the U.S. from Mexico, officials stated.

Border Patrol officials reported the eight men ranged in age from 19 to 36. They were all illegally present in the United States.

Three Migrants from Yemen Apprehended in Human Smuggling Op off California Coast

 

[Orange_Vol1321]

Three Migrants from Yemen Apprehended in Human Smuggling Op off California Coast

San Diego Sector Border Patrol agents apprehended eight migrants including three men from Yemen during a failed human smuggling attempt off the California coast.

During the early morning hours of February 21, the Joint Harbor Operations Center notified Border Patrol agents about a suspicious boat approaching U.S. waters. Border Patrol agents operating surveillance equipment located the boat in the dense fog, according to information obtained from San Diego Sector Border Patrol officials.

Agents arrived in the area and found the small boat beached north of the Coronado State Beach, officials reported. As they approached, the agents observed eight people jumping out of the boat and running to avoid apprehension.

The agents pursued the migrants and apprehended five almost immediately. A search of the immediate area led to the apprehension of the other three, the statement reports.

Agents conducted immigration interviews and identified three of the men as Yemeni nationals. The other five came to the U.S. from Mexico, officials stated.

Border Patrol officials reported the eight men ranged in age from 19 to 36. They were all illegally present in the United States.

Three Migrants from Yemen Apprehended in Human Smuggling Op off California Coast

There's no terrorists crossing the southern border.

 

[joevol33]

There's no terrorists crossing the southern border.

Don't worry, LG, EL, Mick, and Luther will still deny it.

 

[AM64]

There's no terrorists crossing the southern border.

Just some guys rushing to the polls so they can vote for Bernie.

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Illegal immigrant charged with Raping Maryland Girl, 11

A man charged with raping an 11-year-old girl in Maryland was living in the United States illegally, authorities said.

Jonathan Coreas-Salamanca, 20, was arrested along with Ivan Reyes Lopez, 19, earlier this month at the high schools they attended in Montgomery County, Md., WJLA-TV reported. Both men are charged with second-degree rape.

Coreas-Salamanca, a citizen of El Salvador living in the U.S. illegally, faces additional charges of sexual abuse of a minor and a third-degree sexual offense.

“U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) lodged a detainer for Jonathan Coreas-Salamanca, an unlawfully present Salvadoran national, with Montgomery County Detention Center on Feb. 14, following his arrest by Montgomery County Police for sex abuse of a minor and second-degree rape,” ICE spokeswoman Kaitlyn Pote said in a statement to the Daily Caller on Tuesday.

 

[BigOrangeD]

Still Winning!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Rickyvol77]

i have yet to hear from any leftist or liberal on this board that would advocate for ICE not deporting these criminals and any rational explanation as to why liberal cities are refusing to assist them

 

[Orangeburst]

Still Winning!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That is huge.

 

[Orange_Vol1321]

 

[0nelilreb]

Where is Velo & EL ? Usually when Trump tweets they are the ones posting it followed by a MAGA! Lol

 

[Orange_Vol1321]