Missing Malaysia Airlines Jet

#326
#326
FLVOL69 said:
Maybe so, but the circumstantial evidence is suspicious to say the least. I had the same gut instinct he did in regards to terrorism.
Click to expand...

I work in the industry. When a plane goes down after reaching cruise it is always suspicious.
 
#327
#327
lawgator1 said:
Top flight source you got there.
Click to expand...

Just as good as CBS


Thus, what the FBI report is really saying is that a demographic which makes up only 1% of the American population accounts for one-fourth of all deadly terror attacks in the U.S. and 94% of related casualties!* (The 94% statistic is somewhat ironic because it is the same figure than Loonwatch is touting to dispel concerns).* The Jewish population in the U.S. is more than twice that of Muslims, but there were only three so-called Jewish attacks during the entire 25 years (all by the "Jewish Defense League") with a total of three killed.*

Since 2005, there have been at least six additional deadly attacks that would probably qualify as terrorism in the U.S. even to the FBI.* One was the 2012 shooting by a skinhead that resulted in six deaths at a Sikh temple and the other five were by Muslims, which left 19 dead.* This means that since 1980, Muslims in the U.S. have been 35 times more likely to commit terror than all other demographics combined.*
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#329
#329
n_huffhines said:
WTF? This was my first response to you in this entire thread and my second comment about the question at hand.
Click to expand...

Wtf???

You are right. You quoted and apparently found fault in my post.

And while it may or may not be your 1st,2nd or 100th post is irrelevant.

While mavs post was a assumption, he was statically valid. Right or wrong. The numbers were in his favor.

Math is math.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#332
#332
Obsessed said:
Wtf???

You are right. You quoted and apparently found fault in my post.

And while it may or may not be your 1st,2nd or 100th post is irrelevant.

While mavs post was a assumption, he was statically valid. Right or wrong. The numbers were in his favor.

Math is math.
Click to expand...

Don't be so sensitive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#333
#333
If the pilot simply decided to splash the plane in the sea, would that be considered terrorism? Or suicide?
 
#336
#336
volmaverick said:
TRUT FBI numbers are flawed and I showed that fact!
Click to expand...

No, you showed that FBI numbers include, as terrorist acts, the destruction of property. I'm not sure why one would rule property destruction out as acts of terrorism. Surely, if I burn your house down in order to inspire fear in you and in your community, then I am committing a terrorist act. Same with a business. So, your statement about the percentage of terrorist attacks over the past 25 years is wrong.

Further, your source is questionable, at best. They decide to root their findings in some 2013 Brookings Institute Study. Yet, when one clicks on the hyperlink, one is taken to another whack-job internet site "Jihad Watch". The only mention of Brookings on that site brings you to this article:

Al Qaeda's Surprising New Target: Turkey | Brookings Institution

That article does not back up the "facts" listed on "ReligionofPeace" (also funny that 94% is underlined as if it is supposed to be a hyperlink, when it is not).

Oh, and finally, your own whack job site does concede that of the deadly terror attacks in the US over the period in question, only 24% were carried out by Muslims.

So, really, you have shown nothing other than what everyone already knew: 9/11 was the deadliest terror attack in US history.

Your site states that Muslims terrorists are responsible for 2,981 deaths in America. The other 196 belong to non-Muslim terrorists.

2,977 were killed on September 11. So, aside from that one devastating day (which is an outlier), Islamic terrorists are responsible for 4 deaths in America over the past 25 years. Sure, maybe the FBI left out an assassination or two...so, let's bump that total up to 10 deaths.

168 were killed in Oklahoma City. That leaves 28 persons killed by non-Muslim terrorists, aside from that outlier. Thus, even with our generous allotment to the Muslims (bumping 4 up to 10), deaths resulting from non-Muslim terrorists still outstrip deaths from Muslim terrorists almost 3 to 1.

Give 'em Ft. Hood, you say? Oh, okay. Now you get, at most, 23. Still less than 50%

You said you had stated something correct or something. I forget what it was that could have been.

Find a corner. Take a seat. Think about what you've done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#340
#340
therealUT said:
No, you showed that FBI numbers include, as terrorist acts, the destruction of property. I'm not sure why one would rule property destruction out as acts of terrorism. Surely, if I burn your house down in order to inspire fear in you and in your community, then I am committing a terrorist act. Same with a business. So, your statement about the percentage of terrorist attacks over the past 25 years is wrong.

Further, your source is questionable, at best. They decide to root their findings in some 2013 Brookings Institute Study. Yet, when one clicks on the hyperlink, one is taken to another whack-job internet site "Jihad Watch". The only mention of Brookings on that site brings you to this article:

Al Qaeda's Surprising New Target: Turkey | Brookings Institution

That article does not back up the "facts" listed on "ReligionofPeace" (also funny that 94% is underlined as if it is supposed to be a hyperlink, when it is not).

Oh, and finally, your own whack job site does concede that of the deadly terror attacks in the US over the period in question, only 24% were carried out by Muslims.

So, really, you have shown nothing other than what everyone already knew: 9/11 was the deadliest terror attack in US history.

Your site states that Muslims terrorists are responsible for 2,981 deaths in America. The other 196 belong to non-Muslim terrorists.

2,977 were killed on September 11. So, aside from that one devastating day (which is an outlier), Islamic terrorists are responsible for 4 deaths in America over the past 25 years. Sure, maybe the FBI left out an assassination or two...so, let's bump that total up to 10 deaths.

168 were killed in Oklahoma City. That leaves 28 persons killed by non-Muslim terrorists, aside from that outlier. Thus, even with our generous allotment to the Muslims (bumping 4 up to 10), deaths resulting from non-Muslim terrorists still outstrip deaths from Muslim terrorists almost 3 to 1.

Give 'em Ft. Hood, you say? Oh, okay. Now you get, at most, 23. Still less than 50%

You said you had stated something correct or something. I forget what it was that could have been.

Find a corner. Take a seat. Think about what you've done.
Click to expand...

Ad world wide attacks into the mix not just on American soil. Muslim terrorist are a world wide threat not just a USA threat! This missing plane we ate talking about is not a USA attack!
 
#343
#343
therealUT said:
No, you showed that FBI numbers include, as terrorist acts, the destruction of property. I'm not sure why one would rule property destruction out as acts of terrorism. Surely, if I burn your house down in order to inspire fear in you and in your community, then I am committing a terrorist act. Same with a business. So, your statement about the percentage of terrorist attacks over the past 25 years is wrong.

Further, your source is questionable, at best. They decide to root their findings in some 2013 Brookings Institute Study. Yet, when one clicks on the hyperlink, one is taken to another whack-job internet site "Jihad Watch". The only mention of Brookings on that site brings you to this article:

Al Qaeda's Surprising New Target: Turkey | Brookings Institution

That article does not back up the "facts" listed on "ReligionofPeace" (also funny that 94% is underlined as if it is supposed to be a hyperlink, when it is not).

Oh, and finally, your own whack job site does concede that of the deadly terror attacks in the US over the period in question, only 24% were carried out by Muslims.

So, really, you have shown nothing other than what everyone already knew: 9/11 was the deadliest terror attack in US history.

Your site states that Muslims terrorists are responsible for 2,981 deaths in America. The other 196 belong to non-Muslim terrorists.

2,977 were killed on September 11. So, aside from that one devastating day (which is an outlier), Islamic terrorists are responsible for 4 deaths in America over the past 25 years. Sure, maybe the FBI left out an assassination or two...so, let's bump that total up to 10 deaths.

168 were killed in Oklahoma City. That leaves 28 persons killed by non-Muslim terrorists, aside from that outlier. Thus, even with our generous allotment to the Muslims (bumping 4 up to 10), deaths resulting from non-Muslim terrorists still outstrip deaths from Muslim terrorists almost 3 to 1.

Give 'em Ft. Hood, you say? Oh, okay. Now you get, at most, 23. Still less than 50%

You said you had stated something correct or something. I forget what it was that could have been.

Find a corner. Take a seat. Think about what you've done.
Click to expand...
Queue a post involving 9/11 and several exclamation points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#344
#344
volmaverick said:
Ad world wide attacks into the mix not just on American soil. Muslim terrorist are a world wide threat not just a USA threat! This missing plane we ate talking about is not a USA attack!
Click to expand...

The drug terrorism in Mexico weighs pretty heavily. The drug terrorism in South America weighs pretty heavily. The political terrorism in South America still weighs pretty heavily. There are Hindu terrorists and Buddhist terrorists. There are IDF forces and there are US drone attacks. Individuals are terrorized all the time throughout the world by forces that kill and inflict terror. Not all of these forces, nor even most of them, are Muslims.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#347
#347
#349
#349
therealUT said:
The drug terrorism in Mexico weighs pretty heavily. The drug terrorism in South America weighs pretty heavily. The political terrorism in South America still weighs pretty heavily. There are Hindu terrorists and Buddhist terrorists. There are IDF forces and there are US drone attacks. Individuals are terrorized all the time throughout the world by forces that kill and inflict terror. Not all of these forces, nor even most of them, are Muslims.
Click to expand...

And unfortunately this is why "terrorism" is impossible to nail down as to who is responsible. The old "one man's terrorist is my freedom fighter" thought process.
 
#350
#350
McDad said:
All the stereotyping going on up I here and nobody has asked if it was asians driving the plane?

That should be the first question after an accident.
Click to expand...

Underrated post :)

I mean look at Asiana 214 just last year. Statistics are on your side
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top