GoBigOrangeUT
Kind of hot in these rhinos
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2010
- Messages
- 12,564
- Likes
- 9,903
You're a fool if your expectation is that we shine a flashlight on some water and get a christmas tree.
The idea is that we could observe some molecular restructuring as a result into a more organized state. Something that could eventually become RNA and lead to life.
If this occurred spontaneously, it would completely shoot down the "second law of thermodynamics" argument that never held water to begin with.
If this occurs, and occurs at timescale that we could do an experiment with, wouldn't we have already seen it? Wouldn't a sealed sterile container with organic material in it spontaneously produce RNA or whatever?
I feel like that sort of thing would have been noticed, what with us sterilizing instruments, containers, products, rooms, etc that are exposed to light.
First of all, I doubt they expect to witness the spontaneous creation of anything as complex as RNA. Secondly, how in the world would you think we would observe something like that happening?
The conditions aren't as simple as you make it seem. Also, how are we going to tell if something like that did occur? Do you test every glass of water you accidentally leave out for a few months for the synthesis of organic molecules before you pour it out? Or are you capable of spotting this with your naked eye? That would be remarkable.
Science is hard.
I think the odds are extremely high that this "formula" does not in itself explain how life came to be created.
Which means it should be a constant phenomenon at this point.
Good luck finding any uninhabited bodies of water that have been uncontaminated for millions of years and being able to verify this when you find microorganisms in it. I mean, how are you going to tell the difference between newly spawned microorganisms and those that are just naturally inhabiting?
I want to hear what it means to you to "observe this phenomenon."
Do you think before you type, or are you just trolling?