tumscalcium
Ano ba!
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2008
- Messages
- 25,487
- Likes
- 21,315
Thank God we ended up with an extremely honest PresidentRomney learns âfacts are stubborn thingsâ - The New York Times - MSNBC.com
Yeah... honesty and integrity.
People like Romney, Graham, McConnell, etc. are what's wrong with the republican party. Why would anyone want to vote for democrat lite? Why not just vote for the real thing? If people want something different, these people and the ones they're pushing as candidates need to be rejected.Romney learns âfacts are stubborn thingsâ - The New York Times - MSNBC.com
Yeah... honesty and integrity.
Romney disagreed with him, claiming that individuals within the government should have the right to stop social media companies or legacy media companies from putting out content that is “wrong”.
Romney stated “To say that no employee of the government from the president on down to that millions of people who work in the government can speak with a social media company or a Legacy Media Company and express their point of view that an article is wrong or that Avenue they’re going down is wrong, that would shut off free speech.”
Mitt Romney using a bogus argument to allow govt to influence Big Tech. He's technically correct about individuals having the right to have an oppinion, but the issue comes when govt employees (specifically elected officials or people in high cabinet positions) make these demands or add comments. Now it isn't the voice of that individual... it now carries the weight of the govt behind it.
Watch: Mitt Romney Argues That It Shouldn't Be Illegal For Government To Use Big Tech For Censorship | ZeroHedge
Romney knows good and damn well that this isn't about some random govt employee airing out a grievance. It is directly aimed at bureaucrats and elected officials dictating to the media what is and is not acceptable.