'24 MO WR Ryan Wingo (Texas commit)

#2,205
#2,205
Orange_Crush said:
I suspect this state law will be struck down. My understanding is that the SCoTUS basically made NIL a human right--i.e. the right to profit off of your own name, image and likeness, and that the NCAA had no right to strip the athlete of that inherent right with threats to eligibility. Now, the state of Missouri is saying that if a high school athlete doesn't do what they want, they'll strip the athlete of that right with threats to eligibility.

It's going to be an interesting collision between state rights and the SCOTUS, as Missouri just stepped in to do what the SCOTUS says the NCAA can't.
Click to expand...
It can be tied to class attendance but not necessarily “playing” for a particular school. Like with any contract based employment or compensation, there are obligations built in to the contract.
The NCAA has screwed up. They made the rule that NIL can’t be tied to playing for a particular school. The unintended consequences of this stuff puts all NIL in a bad spot.
 
#2,206
#2,206
Franklin_Vol09 said:
It can be tied to class attendance but not necessarily “playing” for a particular school. Like with any contract based employment or compensation, there are obligations built in to the contract.
The NCAA has screwed up. They made the rule that NIL can’t be tied to playing for a particular school. The unintended consequences of this stuff puts all NIL in a bad spot.
Click to expand...

Guess I am a big confused about a work around in the rule. If you are required to enroll and attend class at a specific school you are prohibited from playing at any other. Seems like that if afoul of the letter of the law. Now if you are only required to attend class at the school of your choice then that would be OK I think. I would think you could offer your availability for to the money guys on a portal to portal basis if they want to fly you back to another location for picture shoots etc. as long as it does not interfere with your class attendance where you are enrolled, since that is the driver of their agreement.
 
#2,207
#2,207
GUNTERSVOL said:
Guess I am a big confused about a work around in the rule. If you are required to enroll and attend class at a specific school you are prohibited from playing at any other. Seems like that if afoul of the letter of the law. Now if you are only required to attend class at the school of your choice then that would be OK I think. I would think you could offer your availability for to the money guys on a portal to portal basis if they want to fly you back to another location for picture shoots etc. as long as it does not interfere with your class attendance where you are enrolled, since that is the driver of their agreement.
Click to expand...
Brother, it’s all confusing and even though I’ve been in court way too many times, I don’t have a law degree either. My understanding is that this is a private contract that falls outside of a university or the NCAA but keeps in NCAA requirements.

If you receive a sign on bonus to work for a company but don’t stay the required amount of time, you are required to pay back whatever is stipulated by the contract. The NCAA said it can’t be tied to “playing”’ or “attending” a university. That’s only for NCAA eligibility. So lawyers do what they do and get creative with the language that CAN tie that player to a school.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drvenner, berryvol, volbeast33 and 1 other person
#2,215
#2,215
VOLfrombama said:
The folks at Spyre told me that they have written a location clause into their contracts, so the person has to live there to collect NIL payments.
Click to expand...
A wise man once told me nothing in life is free.

Free samples at Kroger told me he was wrong. Explosive diarrhea the next morning reminded me he was right.

Don’t choose explosive diarrhea (Missouri) Mr Wingo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe Dirt, HeadVol77, DarthVol1 and 5 others
#2,218
#2,218
All they have to do is put in the contract that you have to make an appearance in Knoxville every home game day to receive compensation. It doesn’t tie him to the school but it keeps them from going elsewhere. We need you at this location to promote our businesses on Saturdays throughout the season.
 
#2,223
#2,223
When Drinkwitz is fired after starting 3-7, these 5 star recruits win be back on the market.
 
#2,225
#2,225
Jackcrevol said:
How will Mizzou afford his buyout, what, with all their money going to football marketing?
Click to expand...
I saw a list of the top athletic donations for the top 50 schools and Missouri was UP THERE. Either ahead of UT or close behind I can’t remember but I was shocked.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top