More Climate BS...

#1,501
#1,501
McDad said:
That's clever and astute. I don't like it but credit due, my friend.
Click to expand...
I just cannot stress how big this CC agenda is..you know it. And worse yet it will require trillions that we dont have of investment, it will hurt us militarily. I will vote for a full blown socialist if they were against this scheme. At least it would be temporary
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#1,503
#1,503
Orangeburst said:
I just cannot stress how big this CC agenda is..you know it. And worse yet it will require trillions that we dont have of investment, it will hurt us militarily. I will vote for a full blown socialist if they were against this scheme. At least it would be temporary
Click to expand...
yep the climate change hysteria agenda is working great for the socialists and communists
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, tbwhhs, UT_Dutchman and 2 others
#1,504
#1,504
Biden EPA taxpayer settlement Payouts quietly soar to Left-Wing climate activists

EXCLUSIVE — The Environmental Protection Agency in Joe Biden's first two years as president has quietly steered over double the amount in taxpayer-backed payouts to liberal climate activists and other groups than in President Donald Trump's four-year term combined.

Trump EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt issued a 2017 memo vowing to end "sue and settle," which involves groups challenging the government on aligned issues, followed by agencies ending disputes and approving rules they may be unable to push through Congress. The EPA under Biden, which revoked the memo, spent over $6.9 million in 2021 and 2022 on attorneys fees for settlements with largely environmental groups under the Clean Air, Clean Water, and Endangered Species Acts, whereas agency payouts were $3.6 million for Trump and $5.7 million during Barack Obama's second presidential term, records reveal.


Biden EPA taxpayer settlement payouts quietly soar to left-wing climate activists
 
#1,512
#1,512
0.4 % . Our atmosphere is at 0.4% CO2 ...the deception involved with this global grift is unprecedented. The globalists put into practice Hitlers comments " repeat a lie loud enough, for long enough, and people will believe it is truth."

Those of us with our wits about us can look at the actual science and facts to draw a very different conclusion. Starting with the oft repeated lie that " 97% of scientists believe in climate change." Classic half truth style deception. Surely 97% of scientists DO believe Earths climate changes ...it is demonstrably cyclical. From one ice age to the next with hotter periods and higher sea levels in between. The real question is actually " What % of scientists believe in man made global warming?" Better still, " What % of scientists not on the dole for climate science believe that man made global warming is an existential threat? " There is serious conflict of interest when asking scientists if the "boogey man" they are studying/attempting to justify is real considering they are reliant on huge grants from the government to "study" these alleged impacts to the Earth. If there is no manmade global warming then they will not get paid to study/teach/indoctrinate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, Vol since 77, 825VOL and 2 others
#1,514
#1,514
marcusluvsvols said:
0.4 % . Our atmosphere is at 0.4% CO2 ...the deception involved with this global grift is unprecedented. The globalists put into practice Hitlers comments " repeat a lie loud enough, for long enough, and people will believe it is truth."

Those of us with our wits about us can look at the actual science and facts to draw a very different conclusion. Starting with the oft repeated lie that " 97% of scientists believe in climate change." Classic half truth style deception. Surely 97% of scientists DO believe Earths climate changes ...it is demonstrably cyclical. From one ice age to the next with hotter periods and higher sea levels in between. The real question is actually " What % of scientists believe in man made global warming?" Better still, " What % of scientists not on the dole for climate science believe that man made global warming is an existential threat? " There is serious conflict of interest when asking scientists if the "boogey man" they are studying/attempting to justify is real considering they are reliant on huge grants from the government to "study" these alleged impacts to the Earth. If there is no manmade global warming then they will not get paid to study/teach/indoctrinate.
Click to expand...
There are a few start-up companies whose sole business model involves capturing CO2 out of the atmosphere, a process known as Direct Air Capture. Would need thousands of installations moving huge volumes of air through some kind of CO2 trap to even make a dent at the 4th decimal place in atmospheric CO2 levels. Color me skeptical, but no doubt millions of tax dollars will flow from the .gov into ventures like these.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, Vol since 77, Orangeburst and 5 others
#1,517
#1,517
marcusluvsvols said:
0.4 % . Our atmosphere is at 0.4% CO2 ...the deception involved with this global grift is unprecedented. The globalists put into practice Hitlers comments " repeat a lie loud enough, for long enough, and people will believe it is truth."

Those of us with our wits about us can look at the actual science and facts to draw a very different conclusion. Starting with the oft repeated lie that " 97% of scientists believe in climate change." Classic half truth style deception. Surely 97% of scientists DO believe Earths climate changes ...it is demonstrably cyclical. From one ice age to the next with hotter periods and higher sea levels in between. The real question is actually " What % of scientists believe in man made global warming?" Better still, " What % of scientists not on the dole for climate science believe that man made global warming is an existential threat? " There is serious conflict of interest when asking scientists if the "boogey man" they are studying/attempting to justify is real considering they are reliant on huge grants from the government to "study" these alleged impacts to the Earth. If there is no manmade global warming then they will not get paid to study/teach/indoctrinate.
Click to expand...

I believe it's only 0.04%

Which is even crazier
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, marcusluvsvols and McDad
#1,518
#1,518
'Sue and settle' Business is Booming at Biden’s EPA

Real wages are still down in President Joe Biden’s economy, but far-left activist lawyers are rolling in the dough thanks to the president’s embrace of a loophole Democrats and their allies use to implement policy without input from the public.

When Congress expanded the legislative power of the executive branch during the New Deal, it included a check on bureaucratic power called the Administrative Procedures Act. Under this, federal agencies were allowed to issue regulations that had the force of law without congressional action, but as part of the deal, the agencies had to follow a transparent procedure to collect public input when making new regulations.


This process, known as “notice and comment rule-making,” can be costly, time-consuming, and sometimes embarrassing for administrations that are forced to publish the costs of their policies. Federal bureaucrats would prefer to write regulations in private without oversight or accountability from the public. In the 1970s, Congress created loopholes to allow that.

'Sue and settle' business is booming at Biden’s EPA
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top