More on the British sniper...er, homosexuality

[gsvol]

(I paged back six pages but couldn't find that thread.)

Sniper sues Army over error which put him in danger of being kidnapped by al-Qaeda - Telegraph

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

(I paged back six pages but couldn't find that thread.)

http://www.volnation.com/forum/politics/102248-new-record-sniper-distance-accuracy.html

 

[gsvol]

http://www.volnation.com/forum/politics/102248-new-record-sniper-distance-accuracy.html

Thanks.

There was a post of yours a while back to which I wanted to respond but didn't find again.

In it you said; (something like) "I have pretty much given up on opposing same sex marriage, let 'em."

My question is this, given that marriage has been between men and women as far back as we have a written record, "If we do allow same sex marriages, where then do we draw the line again?"

Can three men get married?

Can a man marry his goat??

Adults marry children? If we allow same sex marriages why not legalize polygamy??

You see what I'm saying??

If we do allow same sex marriages then wouldn't that tend to open a Pandora's box of other possibiltes??

 

[Heebs]

I'm pretty sure it's easy for people to draw the line at 2 human beings.

 

[gorockytop101]

Thanks.

There was a post of yours a while back to which I wanted to respond but didn't find again.

In it you said; (something like) "I have pretty much given up on opposing same sex marriage, let 'em."

My question is this, given that marriage has been between men and women as far back as we have a written record, "If we do allow same sex marriages, where then do we draw the line again?"

Can three men get married?

Can a man marry his goat??

Adults marry children? If we allow same sex marriages why not legalize polygamy??

You see what I'm saying??

If we do allow same sex marriages then wouldn't that tend to open a Pandora's box of other possibiltes??

Isn't that kind of like saying giving women the right to vote opened the door for goats and kids to vote?

I understand the idea of a slippery slope, but I don't think this is one of those cases.

 

[Brog]

Don't let the colored folks eat in the same restaurant GS!

 

[gsvol]

I'm pretty sure it's easy for people to draw the line at 2 human beings.

Some say it's pretty easy to draw the line at a man and a woman.

FWIW there have been plenty of married men who have been granted visas to this country and have married again while here.

That certainly involves more than two human beings.
I doubt that there has ever been any who have been prosecuted, if so, that's news to me.

Isn't that kind of like saying giving women the right to vote opened the door for goats and kids to vote?

I understand the idea of a slippery slope, but I don't think this is one of those cases.

No!

Listen to what Pete Singer, 'the father of animal rights' says; "The last two taboos we need to break are sex with animals and sex with children."

This coming from one of the most respected 'ethicists' in the world, a man who holds a chair at Princeton University.

He also says; "For animal rights to succeed, we must dewtroy the Judeo-Christian religious tradition."

Don't let the colored folks eat in the same restaurant GS!

Why do you always have to be such an ass??

Have something against gay waiters??

I know you just specialize in drive bys and won't respond but perhaps sometime you could find the time to explain from your completely brainwashed point of view what the legal status of two people of the same sex (more or less) has to do with the dining habits of dark skinned people.


FWIW I have no problem with homosexual folks and colored folks eating in the same restaurant, whether those colored people belong to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People or not or even if the homosexuals belong to NAMBLA, GLAAD or LBGT or whether they are just hungry, as long as they can pay the tab.

 

[Brog]

Gsvol, I love you.

 

[gsvol]

Gsvol, I love you.

Love you too, is baby girl in kindergarten yet??

 

[lumberjack4]

Wow GS you hijacked your own thread

As to your question though, let consenting adults marry however they will. Be it 1 man and 1 woman, 2 men, 2 women, 2 men and 2 women, or 1 man 2 women and a tranny. Seriously who cares?

 

[gsvol]

Wow GS you hijacked your own thread

As to your question though, let consenting adults marry however they will. Be it 1 man and 1 woman, 2 men, 2 women, 2 men and 2 women, or 1 man 2 women and a tranny. Seriously who cares?

Perhaps those care who would choose the wiser course for the future of our nation??

So you advocate for an 'anything goes' legal system when it comes to laws concerning sexual activity??

 

[lumberjack4]

So you advocate for an 'anything goes' legal system when it comes to laws concerning sexual activity??

Between consenting adults, absolutely.

 

[IPorange]

I'm so confused in this thread.


No sexually or anything. Totally platonic confusion.

 

[tigervol9802]

So the sniper was gay and had a goat on the side? :unsure:

 

[CSpindizzy]

We have race, gender, nationality, sexual orientation, etc. all rolled up into one topic...

 

[IPorange]

bigotry?

 

[distrovol]

Why is the concept of drawing a moral line in the sand so difficult for some folks to understand? Those who take the "live and let live" position fail to realize that if anything goes, it has the effect of eroding the basis of our country and our culture. Shouldn't we be promoting a culture of solid, stable, mother/father families as the ideal environment in which to most likely raise well adjusted children? And, if homosexuallity is natually "right", how in the world could humanity sustain itself? It doen't fit the natural order of things.

 

[gsvol]

Between consenting adults, absolutely.

The PinkSwastika 4th Edition - Final

We can see that the roots of Nazism are fundamentally interrelated with the homosexuality of its philosophers; a fact noted by many prominent writers and thinkers. (Although it may be mere coincidence we are reminded that the Latin root of fascism is fasces, “a bundle of rods.”

A diminutive of fasces is “******,” a common pejorative for homosexuals.) In the lives of such men as Plato, Frederick the Great, and Nietzsche, whose writings and deeds were foundational to modern fascism, the common denominator is homosexual behavior.

Certainly not every fascist has been homosexual, just as not every homosexual has been fascist. But the glaring truth of history is that contemporary German homosexuals bore a disproportionately large share of the responsibility for the rise of Nazism.

So the sniper was gay and had a goat on the side? :unsure:

We have race, gender, nationality, sexual orientation, etc. all rolled up into one topic...

 

[lumberjack4]

The PinkSwastika 4th Edition - Final

Don't throw your back out reaching for that one.

 

[lumberjack4]

Why is the concept of drawing a moral line in the sand so difficult for some folks to understand? Those who take the "live and let live" position fail to realize that if anything goes, it has the effect of eroding the basis of our country and our culture. Shouldn't we be promoting a culture of solid, stable, mother/father families as the ideal environment in which to most likely raise well adjusted children? And, if homosexuallity is natually "right", how in the world could humanity sustain itself? It doen't fit the natural order of things.

The difficult part for most folks is the inability to understand that their solution is the government to draw the line in the sand instead of the family and/or the individual. I find it very amusing that we all hate on the Liberals and Dems because they want the government to mandate social and economic equality, yet the religious right demands that the government mandate morality. So what if gay marriage and polygamy is legalized? Gays will be gays and polygamists will be closet polygamists regardless on the marriage law. There is no good reason to deny them marriage.

 

[gsvol]

Don't throw your back out reaching for that one.

At least I do have a backbone.

Be sure to wear your kneepads

while bowing to political correctness.


"Sodom and Gomorrah...having given themselves over to sexual immorality and gone after strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire."

 

[gsvol]

The difficult part for most folks is the inability to understand that their solution is the government to draw the line in the sand instead of the family and/or the individual. I find it very amusing that we all hate on the Liberals and Dems because they want the government to mandate social and economic equality, yet the religious right demands that the government mandate morality. So what if gay marriage and polygamy is legalized? Gays will be gays and polygamists will be closet polygamists regardless on the marriage law. There is no good reason to deny them marriage.

Praise Gaia!!

The PinkSwastika 4th Edition - Final

We turn next to the relationship between the Nazi regime and the Islamist terror groups which share its militarism and its anti-Semitism. We distinguish the Islamist terrorists from the specifically fascist and “neo-Nazi” successors to the Third Reich which will be addressed in the next chapter.

Interestingly, while Hitler ranted against Judaism and Christianity, he contrasted the “[Judeo-Christian] theological doctrines devoid of any depth” with “those of...Mohamed [which provided spiritual] sustenance of a much different value” (Angebert:246).

Islamist terrorism has become an issue of great interest since the attacks of September 11th, 2001, against the United States. Interestingly, the leaders of the nineteen terrorists, including ringleader Mohamed Atta, have been reported to be homosexuals.

“Gay” journalist Rex Wockner, quoting what he described as “the sensationalistic-yet-often-accurate National Enquirer” reported that “‘Atta’s gay lover for the past two years was his right-hand man, Abdulaziz Alomari, who was with Atta when he crashed the plane into the North Tower’....Atta and other terrorists believed that ‘women are for procreation only and men are for recreation’” (Wockner Wire, gay.com Daily, November 9, 2001).

Uncharacteristically, the left-leaning Newsweek magazine “scooped” the Enquirer with a piece about the Enquirer story before it was released: “gay” strategist Michelangelo Signorile produced an editorial which, while not denying the truth of the Enquirer claims, dismissed them as irrelevant to the evil behavior of the terrorists.

For children a woman,
for pleasure a boy,
for ecstasy, a warm melon at an oasis.

There are such things as good and evil and there are such things as reward and punishment and there is a more to life than merely just a three dimensional world.

You git whatcha git when you do whatcha do and looking back, you got whatcha got 'cause you did whatcha did.

The concept of wisdom vs foolishness is a valid concept.

 

[IPorange]

Why is the concept of drawing a moral line in the sand so difficult for some folks to understand? Those who take the "live and let live" position fail to realize that if anything goes, it has the effect of eroding the basis of our country and our culture. Shouldn't we be promoting a culture of solid, stable, mother/father families as the ideal environment in which to most likely raise well adjusted children? And, if homosexuallity is natually "right", how in the world could humanity sustain itself? It doen't fit the natural order of things.

The "slippery slope" logic has been applied to many things over the decades, and has always been considered a logical fallacy. You can look that up.

Homosexuality exists throughout nature. Obviously it doesn't serve the "gay" subjects themselves well in a biological or evolutionary (gasp!) context since they produce no offspring, but through a reduction in competition of offspring of their own they are in no way a detriment to "non-gay" subjects that would otherwise be competing for resources with those offspring that never came about.

If one's problem with homosexuality is "it isn't natural," they are misinformed. If it isn't "what God intended," then why is it in "Creation?" I am well aware of what the Old Testament says, but that does nothing but bring more contradiction between the world around us and the Bible so I fail to see how that helps one's case against accepting homosexuality.

 

[IPorange]

gsvol, are you equating homosexuality with pedophilia in your last post?

 

[CSpindizzy]

Let's look at that logic - "Homosexuality exists in nature"....so does cancer and other diseases and negative issues. If we're using the logic that just because it exists in nature that therefore it is 'right', we're treading on thin logic if any logic at all. The logic that two male animals mount and therefore homosexuality exists and therefore it is 'natural' is far fetched as well. A male dog will mount a male human's leg. Does that logic mean that bestiality is permissive as well?

And for the kneejerk reactionaries I am not saying homosexuality is the same as cancer....